Analysis of University Students' Current Level and Importance in ChatGPT Using Borich Needs and The Locus for Focus Model

Hyeyoung Jo, Sewon Oh
{"title":"Analysis of University Students' Current Level and Importance in ChatGPT Using Borich Needs and The Locus for Focus Model","authors":"Hyeyoung Jo, Sewon Oh","doi":"10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.9.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives The purpose of this study is to analyze the perception level of university students regarding ChatGPT using the Borich Needs and The Locus for Focus model. \nMethods For this purpose, a total of 199 undergraduate students from University A in the metropolitan area were selected as participants, and the research was conducted using SPSS 25.0 and Excel software programs. Statistical significance was analyzed using t-tests to examine the differences between the current level and im-portance in IPA analysis.Borich'sNeeds and The Locus for Focus Model were examined in a 2x2 matrix, divided into four quadrants. \nResults The key findings of this study are as follows: First, in the IPA analysis, the reinforcement and maintenance area(HH) revealed 2 items related to understanding ChatGPT, 5items related to ChatGPT principles and applica-tions, and 1 item related to data and machine learning. The concentration management area(HL) included 1 item related to ChatGPT principles and applications, and 3 items related to data and machine learning. The low priority area(LL) consisted of 1 item related to understanding ChatGPT, 2 items related to ChatGPT principles and applica-tions, and 4 items related to social impact. The excessive area(LH) was characterized bybiaseddata in the social impact category. Second, it was found that the differences between importance and current level were higher in terms of importance for all items, except for those related to data bias. This difference was statistically significant. The priority order according to Borich's needs includes 'structuredand unstructured data', 'sensorsand perception', 'computer vision', 'concepts of AI agents' and 'conceptsand application learning of machines'. Third, The Locus for Focus model analysis revealed that the HH area consisted of 9 items, including 'speech recognition and language understanding', 'problem solving and exploration', 'representation and deduction of information', 'concepts and ap-plication learning of machines', 'concepts and application of artificial neural networks', 'data attributes', 'structured and unstructured data', 'classification models', and 'machine learning model implementation'. Fourth, a total of 6 items, including 'speech recognition and language understanding', 'representation and deduction of information', 'concepts and application learning of machines', 'concepts and application of artificial neural networks', 'structured and unstructured data', and 'classification models' were consistently rated as high priority and demanded the high-est attention. \nConclusions The findings of this study indicate the need to explore ways to apply ChatGPT in education. Furthermore, it proposes a long-term education plan to enhance awareness of the social impact of ChatGPT and provide practical strategies for learning and applying it.","PeriodicalId":509731,"journal":{"name":"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.9.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study is to analyze the perception level of university students regarding ChatGPT using the Borich Needs and The Locus for Focus model. Methods For this purpose, a total of 199 undergraduate students from University A in the metropolitan area were selected as participants, and the research was conducted using SPSS 25.0 and Excel software programs. Statistical significance was analyzed using t-tests to examine the differences between the current level and im-portance in IPA analysis.Borich'sNeeds and The Locus for Focus Model were examined in a 2x2 matrix, divided into four quadrants. Results The key findings of this study are as follows: First, in the IPA analysis, the reinforcement and maintenance area(HH) revealed 2 items related to understanding ChatGPT, 5items related to ChatGPT principles and applica-tions, and 1 item related to data and machine learning. The concentration management area(HL) included 1 item related to ChatGPT principles and applications, and 3 items related to data and machine learning. The low priority area(LL) consisted of 1 item related to understanding ChatGPT, 2 items related to ChatGPT principles and applica-tions, and 4 items related to social impact. The excessive area(LH) was characterized bybiaseddata in the social impact category. Second, it was found that the differences between importance and current level were higher in terms of importance for all items, except for those related to data bias. This difference was statistically significant. The priority order according to Borich's needs includes 'structuredand unstructured data', 'sensorsand perception', 'computer vision', 'concepts of AI agents' and 'conceptsand application learning of machines'. Third, The Locus for Focus model analysis revealed that the HH area consisted of 9 items, including 'speech recognition and language understanding', 'problem solving and exploration', 'representation and deduction of information', 'concepts and ap-plication learning of machines', 'concepts and application of artificial neural networks', 'data attributes', 'structured and unstructured data', 'classification models', and 'machine learning model implementation'. Fourth, a total of 6 items, including 'speech recognition and language understanding', 'representation and deduction of information', 'concepts and application learning of machines', 'concepts and application of artificial neural networks', 'structured and unstructured data', and 'classification models' were consistently rated as high priority and demanded the high-est attention. Conclusions The findings of this study indicate the need to explore ways to apply ChatGPT in education. Furthermore, it proposes a long-term education plan to enhance awareness of the social impact of ChatGPT and provide practical strategies for learning and applying it.
利用鲍里奇需求和关注点模型分析大学生目前的聊天 GPT 水平和重要性
目的 本研究的目的是利用博里奇需求和焦点模式分析大学生对 ChatGPT 的认知水平。方法 选取首都地区 A 大学的 199 名本科生作为研究对象,使用 SPSS 25.0 和 Excel 软件进行研究。在 IPA 分析中,使用 t 检验法对当前水平和重要性之间的差异进行统计意义分析。Borich'sNeeds 和 The Locus for Focus Model 在 2x2 矩阵中分为四个象限进行研究。结果 本研究的主要发现如下:首先,在 IPA 分析中,强化和维护领域(HH)显示了 2 个与了解 ChatGPT 相关的条目,5 个与 ChatGPT 原理和应用相关的条目,1 个与数据和机器学习相关的条目。集中管理领域(HL)包括 1 个与 ChatGPT 原理和应用相关的项目,以及 3 个与数据和机器学习相关的项目。低优先级区域(LL)包括 1 个与了解 ChatGPT 相关的项目,2 个与 ChatGPT 原理和应用相关的项目,以及 4 个与社会影响相关的项目。过度领域(LH)的特点是社会影响类别的数据有偏差。其次,研究发现,除了与数据偏差相关的项目外,所有项目的重要性与当前水平之间的差异都较高。这一差异在统计学上具有重要意义。根据 Borich 的需求,优先顺序包括 "结构化和非结构化数据"、"传感器和感知"、"计算机视觉"、"人工智能代理概念 "和 "机器概念和应用学习"。第三,焦点分析模型(Locus for Focus)显示,HH 领域共有 9 个项目,包括 "语音识别和语言理解"、"问题解决和探索"、"信息的表示和演绎"、"机器的概念和应用学习"、"人工神经网络的概念和应用"、"数据属性"、"结构化和非结构化数据"、"分类模型 "和 "机器学习模型的实现"。第四,"语音识别和语言理解"、"信息的表示和演绎"、"机器学习的概念和应用"、"人工神经网络的概念和应用"、"结构化和非结构化数据 "和 "分类模型 "共 6 个项目一直被评为高优先级,需要最高度的关注。结论 本研究的结果表明,有必要探索在教育中应用 ChatGPT 的方法。此外,研究还提出了一项长期教育计划,以提高人们对 ChatGPT 社会影响的认识,并提供学习和应用 ChatGPT 的实用策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信