Historiographic imaginary and hypotheses of heredity in the configuration of Romanian cultural identity

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Ioana Alexandra Lionte-Ivan
{"title":"Historiographic imaginary and hypotheses of heredity in the configuration of Romanian cultural identity","authors":"Ioana Alexandra Lionte-Ivan","doi":"10.35824/sjrs.v7i1.25951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses the ways in which Romanian culture struggles to forge, at the level of historical and cultural discourse, an identity, a “personality”, and a specificity. It observes, within the process of forging its identity through a series of avatars, the discursive strategies through which specificity is revealed as an essential form of national uniqueness as well as the compensatory trends of identity fabrication. The paper also attempts to highlight the forms of historical and literary mystification through which, over time, Romanian culture responded to complexes related to its age, identity, belatedness, heredity, legitimacy, etc. Thus, the analysis reveals that, in essence, all the efforts, complexes and myths through which an identity was negotiated at the level of the histories of literature and Romanian historiographical texts betray, in fact, the same spectrum of the Identity-Otherness dialectic. Romanian culture, like other emerging cultures, was forced, first to survive and, later, in order to have a potential for prosperity, to define itself as a distinct entity by relating to the surrounding cultural reality, its growth and evolution taking place either under the sign of antagonism (i.e. a refusal of allogeneic import), or under that of synchronism (as permeabilization with regard to foreign influence), but, necessarily, as a reference to the Other. Moreover, the paper highlights, at the discursive level, the two main poles that have obsessively polarized the questions of descent and heredity within Romanian culture: its Roman and Dacian ancestries. The nuanced intentions underpinning the cultural need for international recognition by means of belonging as well as differentiation are discussed in the process.","PeriodicalId":36723,"journal":{"name":"Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35824/sjrs.v7i1.25951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyses the ways in which Romanian culture struggles to forge, at the level of historical and cultural discourse, an identity, a “personality”, and a specificity. It observes, within the process of forging its identity through a series of avatars, the discursive strategies through which specificity is revealed as an essential form of national uniqueness as well as the compensatory trends of identity fabrication. The paper also attempts to highlight the forms of historical and literary mystification through which, over time, Romanian culture responded to complexes related to its age, identity, belatedness, heredity, legitimacy, etc. Thus, the analysis reveals that, in essence, all the efforts, complexes and myths through which an identity was negotiated at the level of the histories of literature and Romanian historiographical texts betray, in fact, the same spectrum of the Identity-Otherness dialectic. Romanian culture, like other emerging cultures, was forced, first to survive and, later, in order to have a potential for prosperity, to define itself as a distinct entity by relating to the surrounding cultural reality, its growth and evolution taking place either under the sign of antagonism (i.e. a refusal of allogeneic import), or under that of synchronism (as permeabilization with regard to foreign influence), but, necessarily, as a reference to the Other. Moreover, the paper highlights, at the discursive level, the two main poles that have obsessively polarized the questions of descent and heredity within Romanian culture: its Roman and Dacian ancestries. The nuanced intentions underpinning the cultural need for international recognition by means of belonging as well as differentiation are discussed in the process.
罗马尼亚文化特性构成中的历史想象和遗传假设
本文分析了罗马尼亚文化在历史和文化话语层面上努力塑造身份、"个性 "和特异性的方式。在通过一系列化身塑造身份的过程中,本文观察了将特殊性作为民族独特性的基本形式加以揭示的话语策略,以及身份塑造的补偿趋势。本文还试图强调历史和文学神秘化的形式,随着时间的推移,罗马尼亚文化通过这些形式对与其年龄、身份、迟来性、遗传性、合法性等相关的复杂问题做出了回应。因此,分析表明,从本质上讲,在文学史和罗马尼亚史学文本的层面上,身份认同的所有努力、情结和神话实际上都背叛了身份认同--同一性辩证关系的同一谱系。罗马尼亚文化与其他新兴文化一样,最初是为了生存,后来是为了繁荣,不得不通过与周围的文化现实相联系,将自己定义为一个独特的实体,其发展和演变要么是在对立的标志下(即拒绝异质输入),要么是在同步的标志下(作为对外来影响的渗透),但必然是以他者为参照。此外,本文在论述层面上强调了罗马尼亚文化中血统和遗传问题的两大极端:罗马祖先和达契亚祖先。在此过程中,还讨论了通过归属感和差异化来获得国际承认的文化需求所蕴含的微妙意图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies
Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信