Mathias Stein, Daniel Puppe, D. Kaczorek, Christian Buhtz, Jörg Schaller
{"title":"Silicon extraction from x-ray amorphous soil constituents: a method comparison of alkaline extracting agents","authors":"Mathias Stein, Daniel Puppe, D. Kaczorek, Christian Buhtz, Jörg Schaller","doi":"10.3389/fenvs.2024.1389022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing interest in amorphous silica (ASi) within the fields of soil science and ecology underscores the necessity for a reliable protocol to estimate ASi contents in soil. Alkaline wet chemical extraction methods are commonly employed for silicon (Si) extraction from operationally defined (x-ray) amorphous Si phases or short-range ordered mineral phases in soils and marine sediments. In our study we conducted a comparative analysis of four alkaline extraction methods (1% sodium carbonate, 0.5 M sodium carbonate, 0.2 M sodium hydroxide, and 0.1 M Tiron), assessing their extraction selectivity as well as effectiveness using soils artificially enriched with varying, defined amounts of ASi. While extraction effectiveness was evaluated by determining the recovery rate of initially added ASi, extraction selectivity was determined by measuring aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe) concentrations as indicators of the dissolution of non-target mineral phases. Microwave plasma atom emission spectrometry was used to analyze Al, Fe, and Si concentrations in the extracts. Our results indicate that extraction with 0.2 M sodium hydroxide yields the best outcomes in terms of both extraction effectiveness and selectivity. This more recent extraction technique is conducted at the most alkaline pH (13.3) of all four methods tested, but at ambient temperature (21°C) decreasing the dissolution of non-target mineral phases. Though, no wet-chemical extraction used on heterogeneous samples like soil is precisely selective, and thus able to quantify the target analyte only. Hence, data obtained by such procedures still need to be interpreted with caution considering all their limitations.","PeriodicalId":509564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Environmental Science","volume":"44 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1389022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The growing interest in amorphous silica (ASi) within the fields of soil science and ecology underscores the necessity for a reliable protocol to estimate ASi contents in soil. Alkaline wet chemical extraction methods are commonly employed for silicon (Si) extraction from operationally defined (x-ray) amorphous Si phases or short-range ordered mineral phases in soils and marine sediments. In our study we conducted a comparative analysis of four alkaline extraction methods (1% sodium carbonate, 0.5 M sodium carbonate, 0.2 M sodium hydroxide, and 0.1 M Tiron), assessing their extraction selectivity as well as effectiveness using soils artificially enriched with varying, defined amounts of ASi. While extraction effectiveness was evaluated by determining the recovery rate of initially added ASi, extraction selectivity was determined by measuring aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe) concentrations as indicators of the dissolution of non-target mineral phases. Microwave plasma atom emission spectrometry was used to analyze Al, Fe, and Si concentrations in the extracts. Our results indicate that extraction with 0.2 M sodium hydroxide yields the best outcomes in terms of both extraction effectiveness and selectivity. This more recent extraction technique is conducted at the most alkaline pH (13.3) of all four methods tested, but at ambient temperature (21°C) decreasing the dissolution of non-target mineral phases. Though, no wet-chemical extraction used on heterogeneous samples like soil is precisely selective, and thus able to quantify the target analyte only. Hence, data obtained by such procedures still need to be interpreted with caution considering all their limitations.
土壤科学和生态学领域对无定形二氧化硅(ASi)的兴趣与日俱增,这突出表明有必要制定一个可靠的方案来估算土壤中的 ASi 含量。碱性湿化学萃取法通常用于从土壤和海洋沉积物中操作定义(X 射线)的无定形硅相或短程有序矿物相中提取硅(Si)。在我们的研究中,我们对四种碱性萃取方法(1% 碳酸钠、0.5 M 碳酸钠、0.2 M 氢氧化钠和 0.1 M 铁)进行了比较分析,使用人工添加了不同数量的 ASi 的土壤评估了它们的萃取选择性和有效性。萃取效果是通过测定初始添加的 ASi 的回收率来评估的,而萃取选择性则是通过测量铝(Al)和铁(Fe)的浓度来确定的,铝(Al)和铁(Fe)浓度是非目标矿物相溶解的指标。微波等离子体原子发射光谱法用于分析提取物中铝、铁和硅的浓度。我们的研究结果表明,使用 0.2 M 氢氧化钠进行萃取,在萃取效果和选择性方面都能获得最佳结果。这种最新的萃取技术是在所有四种测试方法中碱性最强的 pH 值(13.3)下进行的,但其环境温度(21°C)降低了非目标矿物相的溶解度。不过,在土壤等异质样品上使用的湿化学萃取法没有精确的选择性,因此只能对目标分析物进行定量。因此,考虑到这些程序的局限性,在解释这些程序获得的数据时仍需谨慎。