{"title":"Homeland in Romanian children’s literature written in the Diaspora","authors":"Cristina Sărăcuț","doi":"10.35824/sjrs.v7i2.25874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Romanian children’s literature has always been situated at the crossways of cultural ideologies. The Romanian texts for children lack innocence due to the implicit level of cultural, social, and historical knowledge they mirror at different epochs. In this paper I investigate how literary texts for children written in Romanian communities living abroad present the idea of homeland. I examine literary works written by three contemporary Romanian writers living in Romanian communities in Serbia: Ana Niculina Ursuleanu, Radu Flora and Slavco Almăjan. My selection includes books published in between 1970 and 2010: Cu Soarele-n Creștet [With the sun on the head], (2006); Soare, Bună Dimineața! [Sun, good morning!], (1998); Cărările Nilului [The paths of the Nile], (2008); Piticii au Uitat să Crească [The dwarfs forgot to grow up], (1987); Pianul cu Păienjeni [The piano with spiders], (1991); Când Vine Primăvara [When spring comes], (1970). In my analysis, I focus upon the role of settings in building the image of an eternal Romanian homeland that transcends the national borders. Thus, I discuss three main types of settings that shape the fiction imagined by the proposed authors, related to the following environments: landscape, family, and school. My analysis considers the theory of landscape proposed by Mitchell (2002, p. 5) in Landscape and Power. According to it, landscape implies the interaction between the human, the natural, the self and the other. For each novel, I analyse the role of settings within the literary texts. I explore Radu Flora’s novel in connection with two elements of setting, landscape and school, respectively. In Ana Niculina Ursulescu’s books I look at the bond between family and landscape, while in Slavco Almăjan’s literary work I highlight the importance of landscape in building the image of childhood. These functions are classified according to a sophisticated range, from the purpose of clarifying the conflict or its function as a symbol (in When Spring Comes by Radu Flora), to the task of mood intensifier attributed to setting (in Balul Strugurilor [The party of grapes] by Slavco Almăjan).\nMy conclusions validate the idea that literary texts constantly build and convey an image of the Romanian identity and a sense of belonging to the Romanian homeland as marked by borders. I focus on nostalgia and irony as the main feelings the authors transmit about the image of homeland. On the one hand, the image of homeland in the literary works written by these three writers implies nostalgia, a feeling conveyed through an adult’s perspective of childhood. On the other hand, sometimes, as it happens in the case of the novel When Spring Comes, the narrator adopts a humorous perspective on history and human interactions among characters. As a final remark, I show that the selection of these three settings (landscape, family and school) creates the image of homeland in connection with a nationalist ideology. More precisely, children’s books reinforce the idea of unity between the two Romanian speaking communities (in Romania and Vojvodina) that share common cultural values. The representation of homeland reiterates a history-oriented ideology and legitimates the assimilation of nation to childhood.","PeriodicalId":36723,"journal":{"name":"Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35824/sjrs.v7i2.25874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Romanian children’s literature has always been situated at the crossways of cultural ideologies. The Romanian texts for children lack innocence due to the implicit level of cultural, social, and historical knowledge they mirror at different epochs. In this paper I investigate how literary texts for children written in Romanian communities living abroad present the idea of homeland. I examine literary works written by three contemporary Romanian writers living in Romanian communities in Serbia: Ana Niculina Ursuleanu, Radu Flora and Slavco Almăjan. My selection includes books published in between 1970 and 2010: Cu Soarele-n Creștet [With the sun on the head], (2006); Soare, Bună Dimineața! [Sun, good morning!], (1998); Cărările Nilului [The paths of the Nile], (2008); Piticii au Uitat să Crească [The dwarfs forgot to grow up], (1987); Pianul cu Păienjeni [The piano with spiders], (1991); Când Vine Primăvara [When spring comes], (1970). In my analysis, I focus upon the role of settings in building the image of an eternal Romanian homeland that transcends the national borders. Thus, I discuss three main types of settings that shape the fiction imagined by the proposed authors, related to the following environments: landscape, family, and school. My analysis considers the theory of landscape proposed by Mitchell (2002, p. 5) in Landscape and Power. According to it, landscape implies the interaction between the human, the natural, the self and the other. For each novel, I analyse the role of settings within the literary texts. I explore Radu Flora’s novel in connection with two elements of setting, landscape and school, respectively. In Ana Niculina Ursulescu’s books I look at the bond between family and landscape, while in Slavco Almăjan’s literary work I highlight the importance of landscape in building the image of childhood. These functions are classified according to a sophisticated range, from the purpose of clarifying the conflict or its function as a symbol (in When Spring Comes by Radu Flora), to the task of mood intensifier attributed to setting (in Balul Strugurilor [The party of grapes] by Slavco Almăjan).
My conclusions validate the idea that literary texts constantly build and convey an image of the Romanian identity and a sense of belonging to the Romanian homeland as marked by borders. I focus on nostalgia and irony as the main feelings the authors transmit about the image of homeland. On the one hand, the image of homeland in the literary works written by these three writers implies nostalgia, a feeling conveyed through an adult’s perspective of childhood. On the other hand, sometimes, as it happens in the case of the novel When Spring Comes, the narrator adopts a humorous perspective on history and human interactions among characters. As a final remark, I show that the selection of these three settings (landscape, family and school) creates the image of homeland in connection with a nationalist ideology. More precisely, children’s books reinforce the idea of unity between the two Romanian speaking communities (in Romania and Vojvodina) that share common cultural values. The representation of homeland reiterates a history-oriented ideology and legitimates the assimilation of nation to childhood.
罗马尼亚儿童文学一直处于文化意识形态的交叉地带。罗马尼亚儿童文学作品缺乏纯真,这是因为它们反映了不同时代的文化、社会和历史知识的隐含水平。在本文中,我将探讨罗马尼亚海外儿童文学作品是如何表现 "祖国 "这一概念的。我研究了三位生活在塞尔维亚罗马尼亚社区的当代罗马尼亚作家的文学作品:安娜-尼古丽娜-乌苏莱亚努、拉杜-弗洛拉和斯拉夫科-阿尔马扬。我选择的作品包括 1970 年至 2010 年出版的书籍:Cu Soarele-n Creștet [头顶太阳],(2006 年);Soare, Bună Dimineața![太阳,早上好!],(1998 年);Cărările Nilului [The paths of the Nile],(2008 年);Piticii au Uitat să Crească [The dwarfs forgot to grow up],(1987 年);Pianul cu Păienjeni [The piano with spiders],(1991 年);Când Vine Primăvara [When spring comes],(1970 年)。在分析中,我重点关注了场景在塑造超越国界的永恒罗马尼亚家园形象中的作用。因此,我讨论了塑造拟议作者所想象的小说的三类主要环境,它们与以下环境有关:风景、家庭和学校。我的分析考虑了米切尔(2002 年,第 5 页)在《景观与权力》一书中提出的景观理论。根据该理论,景观意味着人类、自然、自我和他人之间的互动。对于每部小说,我都分析了环境在文学文本中的作用。我分别从景观和学校这两个环境要素来探讨拉杜-弗洛拉的小说。在 Ana Niculina Ursulescu 的作品中,我探讨了家庭与风景之间的联系,而在 Slavco Almăjan 的文学作品中,我强调了风景在塑造童年形象方面的重要性。我的结论证实了这一观点,即文学作品不断塑造和传达罗马尼亚人的身份形象,以及对以边界为标志的罗马尼亚家园的归属感。我将重点放在怀旧和讽刺上,这是作家们传递的关于祖国形象的主要情感。一方面,在这三位作家的文学作品中,故乡的形象意味着怀旧,这是一种通过成年人的视角来表达童年的情感。另一方面,有时,如小说《当春天来临时》,叙述者会以幽默的视角来看待历史和人物之间的互动。最后,我想说明的是,这三个场景(风景、家庭和学校)的选择塑造了与民族主义意识形态相关的家园形象。更确切地说,儿童读物强化了两个讲罗马尼亚语的社区(罗马尼亚和伏伊伏丁那)之间的团结理念,这两个社区拥有共同的文化价值观。故乡的表述重申了以历史为导向的意识形态,并使民族与童年的同化合法化。