A study on depression, anxiety, and negative emotions in college students in response to the Person-in the-Rain Test

SeiKyung Kim
{"title":"A study on depression, anxiety, and negative emotions in college students in response to the Person-in the-Rain Test","authors":"SeiKyung Kim","doi":"10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.9.655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives This study aims to identify the responses shown in the picture test and negative psychological aspects such as depression, anxiety, and negative emotions by using both the subjective responses shown in the People-in-the-Rain Picture Test(PITR), a projective test, and a multiple-choice self-report test. \nMethods The target was college students attending K University in Region P. 146 copies were distributed and 125 copies were collected. Of these, the data from 108 people, excluding 17 who responded insincerely, was analyzed. The collected data were subjected to frequency analysis, reliability analysis, descriptive statistics, and correlation analysis using the SPSS statics 26.0 program. An independent sample t-test was conducted to confirm gender differences in variables, and a simple regression analysis was conducted to determine the effect of the PITR re-sponse on depression, anxiety, and negative emotions. An independent samples t-test was conducted to confirm the differences in responses to the PITR according to the upper and lower levels of the average emotional score. \nResults First, as a result of checking the correlation between variables, the ‘stress’ response did not have a stat-istically significant relationship with depression, anxiety, and negative emotions in the PITR response, and the ‘coping resources’ response did not have a statistically significant relationship with depression, it was found to be negatively correlated with anxiety and negative emotions, and the ‘coping ability’ response was also found to be negatively correlated with depression, anxiety, and negative emotions. Second, differences in variables according to gender were confirmed in the ‘coping resources’ response and the ‘coping ability’ response among the PITR responses. Third, PITR response was found to affect depression, anxiety, and negative emotions. Fourth, as a re-sult of checking whether there was a difference in the response to the PITR depending on the average score of depression, anxiety, and negative emotions, it was found that there was no difference in the response to the PITR according to depression, the differences in responses to the PITR according to anxiety and negative emotions were verified to have statistically significant differences in both ‘coping ability’ responses. \nConclusions Through the results of this study, it was confirmed that negative psychological aspects such as de-pression, anxiety, and negative emotions can vary depending on how one copes with the stress rather than the stress itself, and that the response to the PITR differs depending on gender in terms of coping with stress. It was confirmed that there was a difference. In addition, we were able to understand that depression, anxiety, and neg-ative emotions are different psychological characteristics, and it was confirmed that coping abilities vary accordingly. The significance of this study is that it provided evidence for early detection, appropriate treatment, and prevention education for college students with mental health difficulties.","PeriodicalId":509731,"journal":{"name":"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.9.655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives This study aims to identify the responses shown in the picture test and negative psychological aspects such as depression, anxiety, and negative emotions by using both the subjective responses shown in the People-in-the-Rain Picture Test(PITR), a projective test, and a multiple-choice self-report test. Methods The target was college students attending K University in Region P. 146 copies were distributed and 125 copies were collected. Of these, the data from 108 people, excluding 17 who responded insincerely, was analyzed. The collected data were subjected to frequency analysis, reliability analysis, descriptive statistics, and correlation analysis using the SPSS statics 26.0 program. An independent sample t-test was conducted to confirm gender differences in variables, and a simple regression analysis was conducted to determine the effect of the PITR re-sponse on depression, anxiety, and negative emotions. An independent samples t-test was conducted to confirm the differences in responses to the PITR according to the upper and lower levels of the average emotional score. Results First, as a result of checking the correlation between variables, the ‘stress’ response did not have a stat-istically significant relationship with depression, anxiety, and negative emotions in the PITR response, and the ‘coping resources’ response did not have a statistically significant relationship with depression, it was found to be negatively correlated with anxiety and negative emotions, and the ‘coping ability’ response was also found to be negatively correlated with depression, anxiety, and negative emotions. Second, differences in variables according to gender were confirmed in the ‘coping resources’ response and the ‘coping ability’ response among the PITR responses. Third, PITR response was found to affect depression, anxiety, and negative emotions. Fourth, as a re-sult of checking whether there was a difference in the response to the PITR depending on the average score of depression, anxiety, and negative emotions, it was found that there was no difference in the response to the PITR according to depression, the differences in responses to the PITR according to anxiety and negative emotions were verified to have statistically significant differences in both ‘coping ability’ responses. Conclusions Through the results of this study, it was confirmed that negative psychological aspects such as de-pression, anxiety, and negative emotions can vary depending on how one copes with the stress rather than the stress itself, and that the response to the PITR differs depending on gender in terms of coping with stress. It was confirmed that there was a difference. In addition, we were able to understand that depression, anxiety, and neg-ative emotions are different psychological characteristics, and it was confirmed that coping abilities vary accordingly. The significance of this study is that it provided evidence for early detection, appropriate treatment, and prevention education for college students with mental health difficulties.
针对 "雨中人物测试 "的大学生抑郁、焦虑和负面情绪研究
目的 本研究旨在通过使用投射测验 "雨中人物图片测验"(PITR)和选择题自我报告测验中显示的主观反应,确定图片测验中显示的反应与抑郁、焦虑和消极情绪等消极心理方面的关系。方法 以 P 区 K 大学的大学生为研究对象,共发放 146 份问卷,回收 125 份。对其中 108 人的数据进行了分析,剔除了 17 名回答不诚恳者。使用 SPSS statics 26.0 程序对收集到的数据进行了频率分析、可靠性分析、描述性统计和相关性分析。为确认变量的性别差异,进行了独立样本 t 检验;为确定 PITR 重答对抑郁、焦虑和负面情绪的影响,进行了简单回归分析。进行了独立样本 t 检验,以确认根据平均情绪得分的上下水平对 PITR 所作反应的差异。结果 首先,通过检验变量之间的相关性,发现在 PITR 反应中,"压力 "反应与抑郁、焦虑和负面情绪之间没有统计学意义上的显著关系,"应对资源 "反应与抑郁之间没有统计学意义上的显著关系,但与焦虑和负面情绪之间呈负相关,"应对能力 "反应与抑郁、焦虑和负面情绪之间也呈负相关。其次,在 PITR 反应中,"应对资源 "反应和 "应对能力 "反应证实了不同性别变量之间的差异。第三,发现 PITR 反应会影响抑郁、焦虑和负面情绪。第四,在检查抑郁、焦虑和消极情绪的平均得分对 PITR 的反应是否存在差异时,发现抑郁对 PITR 的反应没有差异,而焦虑和消极情绪对 PITR 的反应的差异被证实在 "应对能力 "这两个反应中具有显著的统计学差异。结论 通过本研究的结果,证实了减压、焦虑和消极情绪等消极心理方面会因应对压力的方式而异,而非压力本身。结果证实存在差异。此外,我们还了解到抑郁、焦虑和消极情绪是不同的心理特征,并证实应对能力也相应不同。本研究的意义在于为大学生心理健康问题的早期发现、适当治疗和预防教育提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信