Safety and Efficacy of Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation in Patients Aged over 75 Years

Rui Jing, Kun Zhang, Tao Chen, Huan Luo, Yuming Li
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation in Patients Aged over 75 Years","authors":"Rui Jing, Kun Zhang, Tao Chen, Huan Luo, Yuming Li","doi":"10.59958/hsf.7483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The use of second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation therapy is common. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of CB2 ablation for PVI in AF patients aged 75 years and older to those under 75 years old. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted, including AF patients who underwent CB2 for PVI between January 2018 and December 2020 at our center. The patients were divided into two groups based on age: those aged 75 years and older (elderly group) and those under 75 years (control group). Procedural characteristics, complications, and one-year follow-up outcomes were compared between the two groups using Student's t-test or the chi-square test for univariate analysis. Results: A total of 156 AF patients treated with CB2 for PVI were included in the study, with 78 patients aged 75 years and older (elderly group, mean age = 78 years) and 78 patients aged under 75 years (control group, mean age = 66 years). The PVI procedure duration was 86.2 ± 25.8 minutes for the elderly group and 83.2 ± 20.8 minutes for the control group (p = 0.413). The elderly group showed a higher trend of complications (8/78, 10.3%) compared to the control group (2/78, 2.6%) (p = 0.049), although no serious complications were observed. One-year follow-up revealed that approximately 80% of patients in both groups did not experience AF recurrence (p = 0.656). Conclusion: CB2 ablation for PVI appears to be safe and effective in AF patients aged 75 years and older, with outcomes comparable to those in younger patients. However, special attention should be given to venous puncture in elderly patients.","PeriodicalId":503802,"journal":{"name":"The Heart Surgery Forum","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Heart Surgery Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59958/hsf.7483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The use of second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation therapy is common. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of CB2 ablation for PVI in AF patients aged 75 years and older to those under 75 years old. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted, including AF patients who underwent CB2 for PVI between January 2018 and December 2020 at our center. The patients were divided into two groups based on age: those aged 75 years and older (elderly group) and those under 75 years (control group). Procedural characteristics, complications, and one-year follow-up outcomes were compared between the two groups using Student's t-test or the chi-square test for univariate analysis. Results: A total of 156 AF patients treated with CB2 for PVI were included in the study, with 78 patients aged 75 years and older (elderly group, mean age = 78 years) and 78 patients aged under 75 years (control group, mean age = 66 years). The PVI procedure duration was 86.2 ± 25.8 minutes for the elderly group and 83.2 ± 20.8 minutes for the control group (p = 0.413). The elderly group showed a higher trend of complications (8/78, 10.3%) compared to the control group (2/78, 2.6%) (p = 0.049), although no serious complications were observed. One-year follow-up revealed that approximately 80% of patients in both groups did not experience AF recurrence (p = 0.656). Conclusion: CB2 ablation for PVI appears to be safe and effective in AF patients aged 75 years and older, with outcomes comparable to those in younger patients. However, special attention should be given to venous puncture in elderly patients.
第二代冷冻气球消融术对 75 岁以上患者的安全性和有效性
目的:在心房颤动(房颤)消融治疗中使用第二代冷冻球囊(CB2)进行肺静脉隔离(PVI)的情况很普遍。本研究旨在比较 75 岁及以上和 75 岁以下房颤患者使用 CB2 消融术进行肺静脉隔离的安全性和有效性。研究方法进行了一项回顾性观察研究,包括 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在本中心接受 CB2 用于 PVI 的房颤患者。根据年龄将患者分为两组:75 岁及以上(老年组)和 75 岁以下(对照组)。两组患者的手术特征、并发症和一年随访结果采用学生 t 检验或奇平方检验进行单变量分析比较。结果共有 156 名房颤患者接受了 CB2 PVI 治疗,其中 78 名患者年龄在 75 岁及以上(老年组,平均年龄为 78 岁),78 名患者年龄在 75 岁以下(对照组,平均年龄为 66 岁)。老年组的 PVI 手术时间为 86.2 ± 25.8 分钟,对照组为 83.2 ± 20.8 分钟(P = 0.413)。与对照组(2/78,2.6%)相比,老年组出现并发症的趋势更高(8/78,10.3%)(p = 0.049),但未观察到严重并发症。一年的随访结果显示,两组患者中均有约 80% 的患者未再发生房颤(p = 0.656)。结论对 75 岁及以上的房颤患者进行 CB2 消融治疗 PVI 似乎是安全有效的,疗效与年轻患者相当。但应特别注意老年患者的静脉穿刺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信