Different lymph node staging systems for predicting the prognosis of colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms

Yuanyi Zhang, Yue-Wei Cai, Xia Zhang
{"title":"Different lymph node staging systems for predicting the prognosis of colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms","authors":"Yuanyi Zhang, Yue-Wei Cai, Xia Zhang","doi":"10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.1745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a rare malignancy that primarily arises from the diffuse distribution of neuroendocrine cells in the colon and rectum. Previous studies have pointed out that the status of lymph node may be used to predict the prognosis. AIM To investigate the predictive values of lymph node ratio (LNR), positive lymph node (PLN), and log odds of PLNs (LODDS) staging systems on the prognosis of colorectal NENs treated surgically, and compare their predictive values. METHODS This cohort study included 895 patients with colorectal NENs treated surgically from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The endpoint was mortality of patients with colorectal NENs treated surgically. X-tile software was utilized to identify most suitable thresholds for categorizing the LNR, PLN, and LODDS. Participants were selected in a random manner to form training and testing sets. The prognosis of surgically treating colorectal NENs was examined using multivariate cox analysis to assess the associations of LNR, PLN, and LODDS with the prognosis of colorectal NENs. C-index was used for assessing the predictive effectiveness. We conducted a subgroup analysis to explore the different lymph node staging systems’ predictive values. RESULTS After adjusting all confounding factors, PLN, LNR and LODDS staging systems were linked with mortality in patients with colorectal NENs treated surgically (P < 0.05). We found that LODDS staging had a higher prognostic value for patients with colorectal NENs treated surgically than PLN and LNR staging systems. Similar results were obtained in the different G staging subgroup analyses. Furthermore, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values for LODDS staging system remained consistently higher than those of PLN or LNR, even at the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5- and 6-year follow-up periods. CONCLUSION LNR, PLN, and LODDS were found to significantly predict the prognosis of patients with colorectal NENs treated surgically.","PeriodicalId":504226,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"56 1","pages":"1745 - 1755"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.1745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

BACKGROUND Colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a rare malignancy that primarily arises from the diffuse distribution of neuroendocrine cells in the colon and rectum. Previous studies have pointed out that the status of lymph node may be used to predict the prognosis. AIM To investigate the predictive values of lymph node ratio (LNR), positive lymph node (PLN), and log odds of PLNs (LODDS) staging systems on the prognosis of colorectal NENs treated surgically, and compare their predictive values. METHODS This cohort study included 895 patients with colorectal NENs treated surgically from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The endpoint was mortality of patients with colorectal NENs treated surgically. X-tile software was utilized to identify most suitable thresholds for categorizing the LNR, PLN, and LODDS. Participants were selected in a random manner to form training and testing sets. The prognosis of surgically treating colorectal NENs was examined using multivariate cox analysis to assess the associations of LNR, PLN, and LODDS with the prognosis of colorectal NENs. C-index was used for assessing the predictive effectiveness. We conducted a subgroup analysis to explore the different lymph node staging systems’ predictive values. RESULTS After adjusting all confounding factors, PLN, LNR and LODDS staging systems were linked with mortality in patients with colorectal NENs treated surgically (P < 0.05). We found that LODDS staging had a higher prognostic value for patients with colorectal NENs treated surgically than PLN and LNR staging systems. Similar results were obtained in the different G staging subgroup analyses. Furthermore, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values for LODDS staging system remained consistently higher than those of PLN or LNR, even at the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5- and 6-year follow-up periods. CONCLUSION LNR, PLN, and LODDS were found to significantly predict the prognosis of patients with colorectal NENs treated surgically.
预测结直肠神经内分泌肿瘤预后的不同淋巴结分期系统
背景 大肠神经内分泌肿瘤(NENs)是一种罕见的恶性肿瘤,主要由结肠和直肠中弥漫分布的神经内分泌细胞引起。以往的研究指出,淋巴结状态可用于预测预后。目的 探讨淋巴结比值(LNR)、淋巴结阳性(PLN)和淋巴结对数几率(LODDS)分期系统对手术治疗的结直肠 NEN 预后的预测价值,并比较它们的预测价值。方法:这项队列研究纳入了来自监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库的 895 名接受手术治疗的结直肠 NEN 患者。研究终点是接受手术治疗的结直肠坏死患者的死亡率。利用 X-tile 软件确定最合适的 LNR、PLN 和 LODDS 分类阈值。以随机方式选取参与者组成训练集和测试集。使用多变量考克斯分析法研究了通过手术治疗的结直肠NEN的预后,以评估LNR、PLN和LODDS与结直肠NEN预后的相关性。C 指数用于评估预测效果。我们进行了分组分析,以探讨不同淋巴结分期系统的预测价值。结果 在调整了所有混杂因素后,PLN、LNR 和 LODDS 分期系统与接受手术治疗的结直肠 NEN 患者的死亡率相关(P < 0.05)。我们发现,与 PLN 和 LNR 分期系统相比,LODDS 分期系统对接受手术治疗的结直肠坏死患者具有更高的预后价值。在不同的 G 分期亚组分析中也得到了类似的结果。此外,即使在 1、2、3、4、5 和 6 年的随访期间,LODDS 分期系统的接收器操作特征曲线下面积值仍始终高于 PLN 或 LNR。结论 LNR、PLN 和 LODDS 可显著预测接受手术治疗的结直肠坏死患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信