Interactions between Cetaceans (suborder Odontoceti) and Artisanal Fishing in Brazil: an ethnoecological approach

Breno Carvalho, Antonio da Silva Souto Antonio da Silva Souto, Evaldo de Lira Azevedo Evaldo de Lira Azevedo
{"title":"Interactions between Cetaceans (suborder Odontoceti) and Artisanal Fishing in Brazil: an ethnoecological approach","authors":"Breno Carvalho, Antonio da Silva Souto Antonio da Silva Souto, Evaldo de Lira Azevedo Evaldo de Lira Azevedo","doi":"10.15451/ec2024-05-13.15-1-28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies based on the relationship between humans and the natural environment have been proven to be important tools for understanding the influence, knowledge, and perceptions associated with the web of interactions between humans, species and ecosystems. Here, we highlight the interactions between cetaceans and artisanal fishing. Thus, this study aimed to: a) compile studies that consider artisanal fishing and its interactions with small cetaceans in Brazil; b) understand research trends over the years; c) analyse the distribution of studies by country region; d) perform authorship and citation analyses; e) classify the interactions between cetaceans and artisanal fishing recorded by authors and f) identify dolphin species registered in the study. To achieve this, we reviewed the current status of national publications related to the interactions of cetaceans (suborder Odontoceti) with artisanal fishing in Brazil, focusing on ethnoecological studies. Seven databases were used to survey the studies. To classify the interactions, we adopted the categorization proposed by Freitas-Netto and adapted by Di Beneditto. Based on the data analysis, we registered 12 types of interactions, seven of which were grouped according to the descriptions proposed by Di Beneditto and five new categories were described based on the results of this study. The studies reported the interaction of 43.2% (n=16) of the 37 odontocete species reported to occur in Brazil, with emphasis on the species Sotalia guianensis, Tursiops truncatus, Pontoporia blainvillei, Inia geoffrensis and Sotalia fluviatilis. From our research it was possible to observe that ethnoecological studies allow us to answer important questions about the occurrence of species and aspects of fishing. Furthermore, we reinforce the importance of developing studies which focus on the knowledge of the existing relationships between cetaceans and traditional fishing methods, since studies on this topic can generate data that contribute to the establishment of mitigation strategies and the management of species and ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":503748,"journal":{"name":"Ethnobiology and Conservation","volume":"66 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnobiology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2024-05-13.15-1-28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies based on the relationship between humans and the natural environment have been proven to be important tools for understanding the influence, knowledge, and perceptions associated with the web of interactions between humans, species and ecosystems. Here, we highlight the interactions between cetaceans and artisanal fishing. Thus, this study aimed to: a) compile studies that consider artisanal fishing and its interactions with small cetaceans in Brazil; b) understand research trends over the years; c) analyse the distribution of studies by country region; d) perform authorship and citation analyses; e) classify the interactions between cetaceans and artisanal fishing recorded by authors and f) identify dolphin species registered in the study. To achieve this, we reviewed the current status of national publications related to the interactions of cetaceans (suborder Odontoceti) with artisanal fishing in Brazil, focusing on ethnoecological studies. Seven databases were used to survey the studies. To classify the interactions, we adopted the categorization proposed by Freitas-Netto and adapted by Di Beneditto. Based on the data analysis, we registered 12 types of interactions, seven of which were grouped according to the descriptions proposed by Di Beneditto and five new categories were described based on the results of this study. The studies reported the interaction of 43.2% (n=16) of the 37 odontocete species reported to occur in Brazil, with emphasis on the species Sotalia guianensis, Tursiops truncatus, Pontoporia blainvillei, Inia geoffrensis and Sotalia fluviatilis. From our research it was possible to observe that ethnoecological studies allow us to answer important questions about the occurrence of species and aspects of fishing. Furthermore, we reinforce the importance of developing studies which focus on the knowledge of the existing relationships between cetaceans and traditional fishing methods, since studies on this topic can generate data that contribute to the establishment of mitigation strategies and the management of species and ecosystems.
鲸目动物(齿鲸亚目)与巴西手工捕鱼之间的相互作用:一种人种生态学方法
基于人类与自然环境之间关系的研究已被证明是了解与人类、物种和生态系统之间互动网络相关的影响、知识和观念的重要工具。在此,我们强调鲸目动物与手工捕鱼之间的互动。因此,本研究旨在:a) 汇编考虑巴西手工捕鱼及其与小型鲸目动物之间相互作用的研究;b) 了解多年来的研究趋势;c) 按国家地区分析研究分布情况;d) 进行作者和引用分析;e) 对作者记录的鲸目动物与手工捕鱼之间的相互作用进行分类;f) 识别研究中登记的海豚物种。为此,我们审查了与鲸目动物(齿鲸亚目)与巴西手工捕鱼之间的相互作用有关的国家出版物的现状,重点是人种生态学研究。研究调查使用了七个数据库。我们采用了 Freitas-Netto 提出并经 Di Beneditto 改编的互动分类方法。根据数据分析,我们登记了 12 种互动类型,其中 7 种根据 Di Beneditto 提出的描述进行了分类,另外 5 种根据本研究的结果进行了新的分类。研究报告称,在巴西出现的 37 种尾目动物中,有 43.2%(n=16)存在相互作用,重点是 Sotalia guianensis、Tursiops truncatus、Pontoporia blainvillei、Inia geoffrensis 和 Sotalia fluviatilis。从我们的研究中可以看出,人种生态学研究使我们能够回答有关物种出现和捕捞方面的重要问题。此外,我们还强调了开展研究的重要性,这些研究的重点是了解鲸目动物与传统捕鱼方法之间的现有关系,因为有关这一主题的研究可以产生有助于制定缓解战略以及物种和生态系统管理的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信