Assessing Residency and Site Fidelity in Bottlenose Dolphins: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis

IF 0.8 4区 生物学 Q4 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Israel Huesca-Domínguez, Eduardo Morteo, L. G. Abarca-Arenas, Brian C. Balmer, Tara M. Cox, C. A. Delfín-Alfonso, Isabel C. Hernández-Candelario
{"title":"Assessing Residency and Site Fidelity in Bottlenose Dolphins: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis","authors":"Israel Huesca-Domínguez, Eduardo Morteo, L. G. Abarca-Arenas, Brian C. Balmer, Tara M. Cox, C. A. Delfín-Alfonso, Isabel C. Hernández-Candelario","doi":"10.1578/am.50.3.2024.199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Residency and site fidelity are important parameters in population ecology for many species as they indicate the temporal and spatial use for individuals. Although both terms are clearly different, they are used interchangeably due to lack of clarity in their definitions and the ways to assess them, especially in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.). Individuals with well-defined patterns of residency and site fidelity may be more vulnerable to anthropogenic disturbances; thus, the study of these parameters may help to better assess such impacts. However, interspecific differences and logistical restrictions for the study of dolphins have prevented consensus. We set out to investigate the factors that have influenced measurements of residency and site fidelity in bottlenose and a set of other dolphin species through a retrospective (~30 y: 1990 to 2019) literature review. We found 117 scientific papers with a two-fold increasing trend approximately every 15 years, with 50% published in only four journals. Most of the studies were developed in the United States, followed by Australia and Europe, likely due to strict policies for marine mammal conservation. Author collaboration network analysis showed highly atomized national groups in which North American organizations formed the biggest cluster, followed by Australia, Africa, and Europe. However, large worldwide gaps still exist, possibly because of the heterogeneity in marine mammal sampling efforts and limited information availability in the North Pacific, Central and South America, Africa, Asia, and the Indian Ocean. We found 30 different classification methods in which 12 were based on defined categories. We provide conceptual aid to distinguish between the use of both terms, as well as guidance to tackle the challenge of defining patterns of temporal use due to the variability of thresholds for classifying individuals. A paradigm shift is needed to create comprehensive, standardized, and generalized assessments of residency and site fidelity, which can be compared based on their performance across different populations of bottlenose dolphins around the world.","PeriodicalId":8219,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Mammals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Mammals","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1578/am.50.3.2024.199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Residency and site fidelity are important parameters in population ecology for many species as they indicate the temporal and spatial use for individuals. Although both terms are clearly different, they are used interchangeably due to lack of clarity in their definitions and the ways to assess them, especially in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.). Individuals with well-defined patterns of residency and site fidelity may be more vulnerable to anthropogenic disturbances; thus, the study of these parameters may help to better assess such impacts. However, interspecific differences and logistical restrictions for the study of dolphins have prevented consensus. We set out to investigate the factors that have influenced measurements of residency and site fidelity in bottlenose and a set of other dolphin species through a retrospective (~30 y: 1990 to 2019) literature review. We found 117 scientific papers with a two-fold increasing trend approximately every 15 years, with 50% published in only four journals. Most of the studies were developed in the United States, followed by Australia and Europe, likely due to strict policies for marine mammal conservation. Author collaboration network analysis showed highly atomized national groups in which North American organizations formed the biggest cluster, followed by Australia, Africa, and Europe. However, large worldwide gaps still exist, possibly because of the heterogeneity in marine mammal sampling efforts and limited information availability in the North Pacific, Central and South America, Africa, Asia, and the Indian Ocean. We found 30 different classification methods in which 12 were based on defined categories. We provide conceptual aid to distinguish between the use of both terms, as well as guidance to tackle the challenge of defining patterns of temporal use due to the variability of thresholds for classifying individuals. A paradigm shift is needed to create comprehensive, standardized, and generalized assessments of residency and site fidelity, which can be compared based on their performance across different populations of bottlenose dolphins around the world.
评估瓶鼻海豚的栖息地和栖息地保真度:文献综述与文献计量分析
对许多物种而言,居住地和地点忠诚度是种群生态学中的重要参数,因为它们表明个体在时间和空间上的使用情况。尽管这两个术语明显不同,但由于其定义和评估方法不明确,它们被交替使用,特别是在瓶鼻海豚(Tursiops spp.)中。具有明确居住模式和地点忠诚度的个体可能更容易受到人为干扰的影响;因此,对这些参数的研究可能有助于更好地评估这些影响。然而,种间差异和对海豚研究的后勤限制阻碍了达成共识。我们通过回顾性(约 30 年:1990 年至 2019 年)文献综述,着手研究影响瓶鼻海豚和一组其他海豚物种的居住地和地点忠诚度测量的因素。我们发现了 117 篇科学论文,大约每 15 年就有两倍的增长趋势,其中 50%的论文仅发表在四种期刊上。大多数研究是在美国进行的,其次是澳大利亚和欧洲,这可能是由于严格的海洋哺乳动物保护政策。作者合作网络分析显示,各国组织高度分散,其中北美组织形成了最大的集群,其次是澳大利亚、非洲和欧洲。然而,可能由于海洋哺乳动物采样工作的异质性,以及北太平洋、中美洲和南美洲、非洲、亚洲和印度洋的信息有限,全球范围内仍然存在巨大的差距。我们发现了 30 种不同的分类方法,其中 12 种是基于定义的类别。我们提供了概念上的帮助,以区分这两个术语的使用,并提供了指导,以应对由于个体分类阈值的变化而带来的界定时间使用模式的挑战。我们需要转变模式,建立全面的、标准化的、通用的居住地和栖息地忠诚度评估,并根据其在全球不同瓶鼻海豚种群中的表现进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aquatic Mammals
Aquatic Mammals MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY-ZOOLOGY
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
99
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aquatic Mammals is a peer-reviewed journal sponsored by the European Association for Aquatic Mammals (EAAM), the Alliance of Marine Mammal Parks and Aquariums (AMMPA), and the International Marine Animal Trainers’ Association (IMATA). Aquatic Mammals publishes articles related to marine mammals (whales, dolphins, seals, fur seals, sea lions, walrus, dugongs, manatees, sea otters, and polar bears). Topics of publication on both captive animals and wild marine mammals include aspects of husbandry; behavior; conservation; veterinary medicine; anatomy; physiology; training; population trends; and the effects of pollution, climate change, and noise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信