Ecosystem functional types of the circumpolar Arctic tundra based on the seasonal dynamics of vegetation productivity

IF 3
Amanda H Armstrong, D. Alcaraz‐Segura, M. Raynolds, H. Epstein
{"title":"Ecosystem functional types of the circumpolar Arctic tundra based on the seasonal dynamics of vegetation productivity","authors":"Amanda H Armstrong, D. Alcaraz‐Segura, M. Raynolds, H. Epstein","doi":"10.1088/2752-664x/ad4beb","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Biodiversity, when viewed through the combined lenses of compositional, structural, and functional attributes, provides for a holistic understanding of the complexities found within community assemblages and ecosystems. However, advancement in our understanding of how ecosystem functional diversity interacts with structural and compositional diversity metrics is lacking, in part because universally applied methodologies to derive ecosystem functional classifications are still under development and vary widely across scales, extents and biomes. This study presents a methodology to construct ecosystem functional types (EFTs), or areas of the land surface that function similarly, using the MODIS NDVI record, for the terrestrial circumpolar Arctic. EFTs were derived from the seasonal dynamics of NDVI, over the Arctic tundra at 250m resolution and compared to bioclimate subzones and to structurally and compositionally defined vegetation units of the Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map (CAVM). Correspondence analyses of CAVM EFTs to previously delineated CAVM bioclimatic subzones, physiognomic (vegetation) units and floristic provinces revealed a general congruence, indicating convergence across composition, structure, and function; yet also demonstrated substantial functional variability even within bioclimate subzones and vegetation units. Strong latitudinal gradients in ecosystem function are present, with EFT richness ranging from low (34) in northernmost regions to high (45) in southernmost regions. Locally, the mountainous regions of northern Alaska, and eastern and western Siberia had high spatial variability in ecosystem functioning. Aside from these generalities, we found that EFTs varied widely within individual mapped vegetation units, successfully capturing the functional dimension of biodiversity across the circumpolar Arctic tundra.","PeriodicalId":367648,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research: Ecology","volume":"63 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research: Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-664x/ad4beb","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biodiversity, when viewed through the combined lenses of compositional, structural, and functional attributes, provides for a holistic understanding of the complexities found within community assemblages and ecosystems. However, advancement in our understanding of how ecosystem functional diversity interacts with structural and compositional diversity metrics is lacking, in part because universally applied methodologies to derive ecosystem functional classifications are still under development and vary widely across scales, extents and biomes. This study presents a methodology to construct ecosystem functional types (EFTs), or areas of the land surface that function similarly, using the MODIS NDVI record, for the terrestrial circumpolar Arctic. EFTs were derived from the seasonal dynamics of NDVI, over the Arctic tundra at 250m resolution and compared to bioclimate subzones and to structurally and compositionally defined vegetation units of the Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map (CAVM). Correspondence analyses of CAVM EFTs to previously delineated CAVM bioclimatic subzones, physiognomic (vegetation) units and floristic provinces revealed a general congruence, indicating convergence across composition, structure, and function; yet also demonstrated substantial functional variability even within bioclimate subzones and vegetation units. Strong latitudinal gradients in ecosystem function are present, with EFT richness ranging from low (34) in northernmost regions to high (45) in southernmost regions. Locally, the mountainous regions of northern Alaska, and eastern and western Siberia had high spatial variability in ecosystem functioning. Aside from these generalities, we found that EFTs varied widely within individual mapped vegetation units, successfully capturing the functional dimension of biodiversity across the circumpolar Arctic tundra.
基于植被生产力季节动态的环北极苔原生态系统功能类型
通过组合、结构和功能属性的综合视角来观察生物多样性,可以全面了解群落组合和生态系统的复杂性。然而,我们对生态系统功能多样性如何与结构和组成多样性指标相互作用的理解还不够深入,部分原因是普遍适用的生态系统功能分类方法仍在开发中,而且在不同尺度、范围和生物群落中差异很大。本研究提出了一种方法,利用 MODIS NDVI 记录为环北极陆地构建生态系统功能类型 (EFT),或具有类似功能的地表区域。EFTs 是根据分辨率为 250 米的北极苔原上 NDVI 的季节动态得出的,并与生物气候亚区以及北极圈植被图(CAVM)中从结构和组成上定义的植被单元进行了比较。将环极北极植被图上的 EFT 与之前划定的环极北极植被图生物气候亚区、地貌(植被)单元和花卉省份进行对应分析,发现两者总体上是一致的,表明在组成、结构和功能方面存在趋同性;但同时也表明,即使在生物气候亚区和植被单元内部,也存在很大的功能变异性。生态系统功能存在强烈的纬度梯度,EFT 丰富度从最北部地区的低度(34)到最南部地区的高度(45)不等。在局部地区,阿拉斯加北部山区、西伯利亚东部和西部生态系统功能的空间变异性较高。除了这些普遍性之外,我们还发现,在绘制的各个植被单元内,EFTs 的差异很大,成功地捕捉到了环北极苔原生物多样性的功能维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书