Influence of usage and model inaccuracies on the performance of smart hot water heaters: lessons learned from a demand response field test

P. Kepplinger, Gerhard Huber, M. Preißinger
{"title":"Influence of usage and model inaccuracies on the performance of smart hot water heaters: lessons learned from a demand response field test","authors":"P. Kepplinger, Gerhard Huber, M. Preißinger","doi":"10.3389/fenrg.2024.1363378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Domestic hot water heaters are considered to be easily integrated as flexible loads for demand response. While literature grows on reproducible simulation and lab tests, real-world implementation in field tests considering state estimation and demand prediction-based model predictive control approaches is rare. This work reports the findings of a field test with 16 autonomous smart domestic hot water heaters. The heaters were equipped with a retrofittable sensor/actuator setup and a real-time price-driven model predictive control unit, which covers state estimation, demand prediction, and optimization of switching times. With the introduction of generic performance indicators (specific costs and thermal efficiency), the results achieved in the field are compared by simulations to standard control modes (instantaneous heating, hysteresis, night-only switching). To evaluate how model predictive control performance depends on the user demand prediction and state estimation accuracy, simulations assuming perfect predictions and state estimations are conducted based on the data measured in the field. Results prove the feasible benefit of RTP-based model predictive control in the field compared to a hysteresis-based standard control regarding cost reduction and efficiency increase but show a strong dependency on the degree of utilization.","PeriodicalId":503838,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Energy Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Energy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1363378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Domestic hot water heaters are considered to be easily integrated as flexible loads for demand response. While literature grows on reproducible simulation and lab tests, real-world implementation in field tests considering state estimation and demand prediction-based model predictive control approaches is rare. This work reports the findings of a field test with 16 autonomous smart domestic hot water heaters. The heaters were equipped with a retrofittable sensor/actuator setup and a real-time price-driven model predictive control unit, which covers state estimation, demand prediction, and optimization of switching times. With the introduction of generic performance indicators (specific costs and thermal efficiency), the results achieved in the field are compared by simulations to standard control modes (instantaneous heating, hysteresis, night-only switching). To evaluate how model predictive control performance depends on the user demand prediction and state estimation accuracy, simulations assuming perfect predictions and state estimations are conducted based on the data measured in the field. Results prove the feasible benefit of RTP-based model predictive control in the field compared to a hysteresis-based standard control regarding cost reduction and efficiency increase but show a strong dependency on the degree of utilization.
使用情况和模型误差对智能热水器性能的影响:从需求响应现场测试中汲取的经验教训
家用热水器被认为可以很容易地集成为需求响应的灵活负载。尽管有关可重复模拟和实验室测试的文献越来越多,但考虑到基于状态估计和需求预测的模型预测控制方法的现场测试中的实际应用却很少见。这项工作报告了 16 台自主智能家用热水器的现场测试结果。这些热水器配备了可加装的传感器/执行器装置和实时价格驱动模型预测控制单元,其中包括状态估计、需求预测和开关时间优化。在引入通用性能指标(具体成本和热效率)后,通过模拟将现场取得的结果与标准控制模式(瞬时加热、滞后、夜间切换)进行了比较。为了评估模型预测控制性能如何取决于用户需求预测和状态估计的准确性,根据现场测量的数据进行了模拟,假定预测和状态估计完美无缺。结果证明,与基于滞后的标准控制相比,基于 RTP 的现场模型预测控制在降低成本和提高效率方面具有可行的优势,但也显示出与利用率密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信