Sang og syngning i skolen

Lea Wierød Borčak, Katrine Frøkjær Baunvig
{"title":"Sang og syngning i skolen","authors":"Lea Wierød Borčak, Katrine Frøkjær Baunvig","doi":"10.7146/sang.v4i.145310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Songs and singing in school: Danish school singing between tangible and intangible cultural heritage \nFor centuries, singing has played a vital role in elementary schools in Denmark. During the 20th Century, singing’s significance – in Denmark as well as elsewhere in Europe – was gradually downplayed, and singing was reduced from an independent subject and an overarching activity to a subdiscipline under the broader subject of “Mus­ic”. In the 2020’s a renewed interest in communal singing is surging in Denmark; this also entails an increasing focus on the benefits of school singing. Political and societal discourse is fraught with wishes of revitalizing singing culture in schools. However, the arguments to support such wishes are quite different in nature, some­times lead­ing to misconceptions. This article aims to show that arguments for school singing fall within a continuum between two poles: In one end of the continuum, singing is valued as a way to preserve a culturally valued repertoire of songs, and in the other end, singing is val­ued as a beneficial activity regardless of what is being sung. The purpose of the article is thus to establish a conceptual distinction that has hitherto been unclear, underscored by the inability of the Danish language to discriminate clearly between “song” and “singing”. To support our case, we mobilize the conceptual pair of tangible and intangible cultural heritage, arguing that these can be mapped on to the distinction between school singing as preservation of songs vs. as an activity in its own right. Further, we trace the occurrence and connotation of the word “song” in Danish public newspapers from the late 18th Century to the 2020’s, showing that the term does indeed fluctuate between connotations of tangible and intangible cultural heritage throughout the period.","PeriodicalId":292790,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskriftet SANG","volume":"54 35","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskriftet SANG","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/sang.v4i.145310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Songs and singing in school: Danish school singing between tangible and intangible cultural heritage For centuries, singing has played a vital role in elementary schools in Denmark. During the 20th Century, singing’s significance – in Denmark as well as elsewhere in Europe – was gradually downplayed, and singing was reduced from an independent subject and an overarching activity to a subdiscipline under the broader subject of “Mus­ic”. In the 2020’s a renewed interest in communal singing is surging in Denmark; this also entails an increasing focus on the benefits of school singing. Political and societal discourse is fraught with wishes of revitalizing singing culture in schools. However, the arguments to support such wishes are quite different in nature, some­times lead­ing to misconceptions. This article aims to show that arguments for school singing fall within a continuum between two poles: In one end of the continuum, singing is valued as a way to preserve a culturally valued repertoire of songs, and in the other end, singing is val­ued as a beneficial activity regardless of what is being sung. The purpose of the article is thus to establish a conceptual distinction that has hitherto been unclear, underscored by the inability of the Danish language to discriminate clearly between “song” and “singing”. To support our case, we mobilize the conceptual pair of tangible and intangible cultural heritage, arguing that these can be mapped on to the distinction between school singing as preservation of songs vs. as an activity in its own right. Further, we trace the occurrence and connotation of the word “song” in Danish public newspapers from the late 18th Century to the 2020’s, showing that the term does indeed fluctuate between connotations of tangible and intangible cultural heritage throughout the period.
在学校唱歌跳舞
学校里的歌曲和歌唱:丹麦学校的歌声介于物质文化遗产和非物质文化遗产之间 几个世纪以来,歌声在丹麦的小学中一直发挥着至关重要的作用。20 世纪,在丹麦和欧洲其他国家,歌唱的重要性逐渐被淡化,歌唱也从一门独立的学科和一项重要的活动沦为 "音乐 "大学科下的一门分支学科。20 世纪 20 年代,丹麦重新兴起了对集体歌唱的兴趣,这也使得人们越来越关注学校歌唱的益处。政治和社会言论充满了振兴学校歌唱文化的愿望。然而,支持这些愿望的论据在本质上却大相径庭,有时甚至会导致误解。本文旨在说明,支持校园歌唱的论点处于两极之间的连续统一体中:在连续统一体的一端,人们重视歌唱,将其视为保存具有文化价值的歌曲曲目的一种方式;而在另一端,人们重视歌唱,将其视为一种有益的活动,无论唱的是什么。因此,这篇文章的目的是要建立一个迄今为止尚不明确的概念区分,丹麦语无法明确区分 "歌曲 "和 "歌唱 "就更凸显了这一点。为了支持我们的论点,我们使用了物质文化遗产和非物质文化遗产这一对概念,并认为这些概念可以映射到学校歌唱作为保存歌曲与作为一项活动本身之间的区别。此外,我们还追溯了 "歌曲 "一词从 18 世纪末到 2020 年代在丹麦公共报纸上的出现和内涵,表明该词在整个时期确实在物质和非物质文化遗产的内涵之间波动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信