PUBLIC DOMAIN AS INDONESIA'S TRADEMARK LAW IN THE UTILITARIAN'S PERSPECTIVE

Trisa Rembonita, Fokky Fuad Wasitaatmaja
{"title":"PUBLIC DOMAIN AS INDONESIA'S TRADEMARK LAW IN THE UTILITARIAN'S PERSPECTIVE","authors":"Trisa Rembonita, Fokky Fuad Wasitaatmaja","doi":"10.56127/ijml.v3i2.1294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia’s Intellectual property rights encompass trademarks’ protection, copyrights, patents, geographical indications, industrial designs, circuit layout designs, and trade secrets, including aqua, the botol, and ecoprint, which use generic words and non-distinctiveness and disturb public order. Ecoprint became a public domain in 2001. However, it was approved as a trademark of products by the DGIPR in 2019 and protected by the law, allowing it to reap the economic benefits. The research problem is: How is the public domain of ecoprint used by trademarks being reviewed in positive Indonesian law from the perspective of utilitarian theory? The research uses a normative descriptive method with a conceptual approach and a comparative approach from secondary data, primary and secondary legal materials, and is analyzed using Jeremy Bentham's theory of utility, \"the greatest happiness from the greatest number, namely through the provision of livelihood, abundance, security, and equality.\" The results indicate that Indonesian law does not explicitly manage the public domain as an intellectual property right that provides direct benefits to the community. The public domain becomes a trademark, creating incentives only for trademark owners instead of the community. IPR should cover the public domain to ensure incentives that benefit the wider welfare, including MSMEs.","PeriodicalId":155984,"journal":{"name":"International Journal Multidisciplinary Science","volume":"16 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal Multidisciplinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56127/ijml.v3i2.1294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indonesia’s Intellectual property rights encompass trademarks’ protection, copyrights, patents, geographical indications, industrial designs, circuit layout designs, and trade secrets, including aqua, the botol, and ecoprint, which use generic words and non-distinctiveness and disturb public order. Ecoprint became a public domain in 2001. However, it was approved as a trademark of products by the DGIPR in 2019 and protected by the law, allowing it to reap the economic benefits. The research problem is: How is the public domain of ecoprint used by trademarks being reviewed in positive Indonesian law from the perspective of utilitarian theory? The research uses a normative descriptive method with a conceptual approach and a comparative approach from secondary data, primary and secondary legal materials, and is analyzed using Jeremy Bentham's theory of utility, "the greatest happiness from the greatest number, namely through the provision of livelihood, abundance, security, and equality." The results indicate that Indonesian law does not explicitly manage the public domain as an intellectual property right that provides direct benefits to the community. The public domain becomes a trademark, creating incentives only for trademark owners instead of the community. IPR should cover the public domain to ensure incentives that benefit the wider welfare, including MSMEs.
从功利主义角度看印度尼西亚商标法中的公有领域
印尼的知识产权包括商标保护、版权、专利、地理标志、工业设计、电路布局设计和商业秘密,其中包括 Aqua、the botol 和 ecoprint,这些商标使用了通用词汇,不具有独特性,扰乱了公共秩序。Ecoprint 于 2001 年成为公有领域。不过,2019 年,它被知识产权总局批准为产品商标,受到法律保护,可以获得经济利益。研究的问题是:从功利主义理论的角度来看,印度尼西亚实在法是如何审查商标所使用的生态印花公有领域的?研究采用规范描述法,从二手数据、第一手和第二手法律材料中采用概念法和比较法,并使用杰里米-边沁的功利理论进行分析,"即通过提供生计、丰裕、安全和平等,使最大多数人获得最大的幸福"。研究结果表明,印尼法律并没有明确将公有领域作为一项直接为社会带来利益的知识产权来管理。公有领域变成了商标,只对商标所有人而不是社区产生激励作用。知识产权应涵盖公共领域,以确保激励措施惠及更广泛的福利,包括中小微企业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信