Balanced Mix Design Plus for Mixtures that Contain Recycled Asphalt Pavement

D. Mocelin, Y. R. Kim
{"title":"Balanced Mix Design Plus for Mixtures that Contain Recycled Asphalt Pavement","authors":"D. Mocelin, Y. R. Kim","doi":"10.1177/03611981241245687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent efforts have been made to include mixture performance tests at the mix design stage using so-called “balanced” mix design (BMD). This paper evaluates the use of two mixtures that contain intermediate and high recycled asphalt pavement contents in the context of a BMD approach referred to as balanced mix design plus (BMD+). BMD+ utilizes the dynamic modulus, cyclic fatigue, and stress sweep rutting tests and mechanistic models and has three tiers of design based on the amount of performance testing required. As part of the BMD+ approach, index–volumetrics relationships (IVRs) and performance–volumetrics relationships (PVRs) based on the four-corner concept were developed for the two mixtures and verified using the performance data from seven other volumetric conditions. The developed PVRs were used to perform BMD+ Tier 3 analysis of the two mixtures, whereas the IVRs based on two points at the target air void content of 4% were used to conduct BMD+ Tier 2 analysis. The results indicate that the use of BMD+ Tier 2, which requires performance tests at only two conditions and without pavement simulations, yields longer lasting mixtures compared with Tier 1, which follows the Superpave volumetric mix design method. It was also found that Tier 3 requires more testing and pavement simulations but leads to even further gains in predicted life duration compared with Tier 2.","PeriodicalId":509035,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241245687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent efforts have been made to include mixture performance tests at the mix design stage using so-called “balanced” mix design (BMD). This paper evaluates the use of two mixtures that contain intermediate and high recycled asphalt pavement contents in the context of a BMD approach referred to as balanced mix design plus (BMD+). BMD+ utilizes the dynamic modulus, cyclic fatigue, and stress sweep rutting tests and mechanistic models and has three tiers of design based on the amount of performance testing required. As part of the BMD+ approach, index–volumetrics relationships (IVRs) and performance–volumetrics relationships (PVRs) based on the four-corner concept were developed for the two mixtures and verified using the performance data from seven other volumetric conditions. The developed PVRs were used to perform BMD+ Tier 3 analysis of the two mixtures, whereas the IVRs based on two points at the target air void content of 4% were used to conduct BMD+ Tier 2 analysis. The results indicate that the use of BMD+ Tier 2, which requires performance tests at only two conditions and without pavement simulations, yields longer lasting mixtures compared with Tier 1, which follows the Superpave volumetric mix design method. It was also found that Tier 3 requires more testing and pavement simulations but leads to even further gains in predicted life duration compared with Tier 2.
含有再生沥青路面的混合料的平衡混合设计加法
最近,人们努力在混合料设计阶段采用所谓的 "平衡 "混合料设计(BMD)进行混合料性能测试。本文在被称为 "平衡混合设计+"(BMD+)的 "平衡 "混合设计方法的背景下,评估了两种混合料的使用情况,这两种混合料分别含有中等含量和高含量的再生沥青路面。BMD+ 利用动态模量、循环疲劳和应力扫描车辙试验以及力学模型,并根据所需的性能测试量分为三层设计。作为 BMD+ 方法的一部分,根据四角概念为两种混合物开发了指数-体积关系(IVRs)和性能-体积关系(PVRs),并使用其他七种体积条件的性能数据进行了验证。所开发的 PVRs 用于对两种混合物进行 BMD+ 第 3 级分析,而基于目标空气空隙含量为 4% 的两个点的 IVRs 则用于进行 BMD+ 第 2 级分析。结果表明,与采用 Superpave 体积混合料设计方法的第 1 级相比,使用 BMD+ 第 2 级(只需在两种条件下进行性能测试,无需进行路面模拟)可获得更持久的混合料。研究还发现,第 3 级需要进行更多的测试和路面模拟,但与第 2 级相比,其预测寿命更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信