Resisting Divides: Assimilation, Multiculturalism, and Place-Based Solidarity in Sápmi and Palestine

Florian Carl, Federica Stagni
{"title":"Resisting Divides: Assimilation, Multiculturalism, and Place-Based Solidarity in Sápmi and Palestine","authors":"Florian Carl, Federica Stagni","doi":"10.1177/03043754241249797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Like roots reaching for the nourishment of familiar ground, generations of resistance lineages continue to weave a worldwide tapestry of solidarity. These efforts help to disrupt various forms of colonial violence, including under the guise of liberal democracies. One of the multiple mechanisms they target is how people and lands are pitted against one another through adversarial categories of difference. Such efforts are a powerful antidote to colonial fragmentations, mobilizing differences via shared goals based on grounded solidarities. This article seeks to answer how anti-colonial struggles in Palestine and Sápmi engage with three ways of structuring similarities and differences. We thereby utilize Coulthard’s (2014) framework of recognition politics, divided into (1) assimilation, (2) multiculturalism, and (3) place-based solidarity. Next to excerpts from local organizers and a speculative dialogue between interviewees, we reference Audre Lorde’s work to better understand the relational qualities of differences. Our research shows that the structural dominance of assimilatory and multiculturalist approaches to difference tends to stabilize injustices while normalizing colonial violence, including via Westernized peace politics like the Oslo Accords or state-led reconciliation initiatives. On the other hand, the integrity of place-based solidarity generates reciprocal relationships and interdependent responsibilities, which undermine colonial divide-and-conquer politics. With the help of our interviewees, this article provides a shared analysis to further the solidarity between the struggles of two of colonial modernity’s most critical fronts, Sápmi and Palestine.","PeriodicalId":516896,"journal":{"name":"Alternatives: Global, Local, Political","volume":"117 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternatives: Global, Local, Political","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754241249797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Like roots reaching for the nourishment of familiar ground, generations of resistance lineages continue to weave a worldwide tapestry of solidarity. These efforts help to disrupt various forms of colonial violence, including under the guise of liberal democracies. One of the multiple mechanisms they target is how people and lands are pitted against one another through adversarial categories of difference. Such efforts are a powerful antidote to colonial fragmentations, mobilizing differences via shared goals based on grounded solidarities. This article seeks to answer how anti-colonial struggles in Palestine and Sápmi engage with three ways of structuring similarities and differences. We thereby utilize Coulthard’s (2014) framework of recognition politics, divided into (1) assimilation, (2) multiculturalism, and (3) place-based solidarity. Next to excerpts from local organizers and a speculative dialogue between interviewees, we reference Audre Lorde’s work to better understand the relational qualities of differences. Our research shows that the structural dominance of assimilatory and multiculturalist approaches to difference tends to stabilize injustices while normalizing colonial violence, including via Westernized peace politics like the Oslo Accords or state-led reconciliation initiatives. On the other hand, the integrity of place-based solidarity generates reciprocal relationships and interdependent responsibilities, which undermine colonial divide-and-conquer politics. With the help of our interviewees, this article provides a shared analysis to further the solidarity between the struggles of two of colonial modernity’s most critical fronts, Sápmi and Palestine.
抵制分裂:萨米和巴勒斯坦的同化、多元文化主义与地方团结
世世代代的抵抗运动就像在熟悉的土地上生根发芽一样,继续编织着世界范围内的团结。这些努力有助于瓦解各种形式的殖民暴力,包括打着自由民主幌子的殖民暴力。它们所针对的多种机制之一,就是人与土地如何通过对抗性的差异类别而相互对立。这些努力是对殖民分裂的有力反击,通过基于基础团结的共同目标来调动差异。本文试图回答巴勒斯坦和萨米的反殖民斗争是如何通过三种方式构建相似性和差异性的。因此,我们利用库尔萨德(Coulthard,2014 年)的承认政治框架,将其分为(1)同化、(2)多元文化主义和(3)基于地方的团结。除了当地组织者的摘录和受访者之间的推测性对话之外,我们还参考了奥德丽-洛德的作品,以更好地理解差异的关系特质。我们的研究表明,同化和多元文化主义处理差异的结构性主导倾向于稳定不公正现象,同时使殖民暴力正常化,包括通过西方化的和平政治(如《奥斯陆协定》或国家主导的和解倡议)。另一方面,基于地方团结的完整性产生了互惠关系和相互依存的责任,从而破坏了殖民主义的分而治之政治。在受访者的帮助下,本文提供了一个共同的分析,以促进萨米和巴勒斯坦这两条殖民现代性最关键战线之间的团结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书