Fighting corruption: A theoretical articulation of the themes of social responsibility, corporate governance, and agency theory

Mônica Cristina Rovaris Machado, Ruan Carlos dos Santos
{"title":"Fighting corruption: A theoretical articulation of the themes of social responsibility, corporate governance, and agency theory","authors":"Mônica Cristina Rovaris Machado, Ruan Carlos dos Santos","doi":"10.37497/corruptionreview.6.2024.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Corruption, seen as the abuse or misuse of power or trust for one's benefit instead of the purpose for which that power or trust was granted, has caused problems for many countries and the principles of Social Responsibility through the models of Carroll and Schwartz and Corporate Governance (have been pointed out in the literature as a mitigating agent of this problem. On the other hand, other research indicates the need to be cautious when guided by the mentality of the Agency Theory, which defends it as a neutral and sufficient instrument to mitigate corruption problems.\nMethod: This study consists of a theoretical essay based on a bibliographical survey that exposes the themes of Corruption, Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance, and Agency Theory. It surveys the different definitions, lines of research, lines of thought, supporting theories, dualities, and conflicts around the mainstream.\nResults: The study's justification is centered on the perception that while studies have empirically tested the relationship between corruption and countries' accounting environments, only some have dedicated themselves to critically reflecting on the knowledge produced about this relationship.\nOriginality/Relevance: In the context presented, a good governance structure is recommended for effective administration and management in anti-corruption bodies. The principles of Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility, which are Transparency (disclosure), Accountability, and Fairness, align with the principles of Agency Theory, which are mainly related to ethics and morality in interpersonal relationships in organizations.\nTheoretical/methodological contributions: This contribution is intended to reflect on the need for organizations to contribute to the fight against corruption in their relations and to the realization of a socially responsible administration through Corporate Governance and Agency Theory, with consonance between the objectives of shareholders and agents in an intermittent fight against corruption.","PeriodicalId":359393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Corruption Review","volume":"32 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Corruption Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37497/corruptionreview.6.2024.78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Corruption, seen as the abuse or misuse of power or trust for one's benefit instead of the purpose for which that power or trust was granted, has caused problems for many countries and the principles of Social Responsibility through the models of Carroll and Schwartz and Corporate Governance (have been pointed out in the literature as a mitigating agent of this problem. On the other hand, other research indicates the need to be cautious when guided by the mentality of the Agency Theory, which defends it as a neutral and sufficient instrument to mitigate corruption problems. Method: This study consists of a theoretical essay based on a bibliographical survey that exposes the themes of Corruption, Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance, and Agency Theory. It surveys the different definitions, lines of research, lines of thought, supporting theories, dualities, and conflicts around the mainstream. Results: The study's justification is centered on the perception that while studies have empirically tested the relationship between corruption and countries' accounting environments, only some have dedicated themselves to critically reflecting on the knowledge produced about this relationship. Originality/Relevance: In the context presented, a good governance structure is recommended for effective administration and management in anti-corruption bodies. The principles of Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility, which are Transparency (disclosure), Accountability, and Fairness, align with the principles of Agency Theory, which are mainly related to ethics and morality in interpersonal relationships in organizations. Theoretical/methodological contributions: This contribution is intended to reflect on the need for organizations to contribute to the fight against corruption in their relations and to the realization of a socially responsible administration through Corporate Governance and Agency Theory, with consonance between the objectives of shareholders and agents in an intermittent fight against corruption.
打击腐败:社会责任、公司治理和代理理论的理论阐述
目的:腐败被视为为了个人利益而滥用或误用权力或信任,而不是为了实现赋予权力或信任的目的,它给许多国家造成了问题,而通过卡罗尔和施瓦茨的模型以及公司治理(文献中指出,社会责任原则是缓解这一问题的一种手段)提出的社会责任原则也给许多国家造成了问题。另一方面,其他研究表明,在代理理论的指导下需要谨慎行事,该理论认为代理理论是缓解腐败问题的中性和充分的工具:本研究包括一篇基于书目调查的理论文章,揭示了腐败、社会责任、公司治理和代理理论等主题。研究调查了主流理论的不同定义、研究方向、思路、支持理论、二元性和冲突:本研究的理由主要在于,虽然已有研究对腐败与国家会计环境之间的关系进行了实证检验,但只有部分研究致力于批判性地反思有关这一关系的知识:在此背景下,建议建立良好的治理结构,以便对反腐败机构进行有效的行政管理。公司治理和社会责任的原则,即透明(披露)、问责和公平,与代理理论的原则相一致,后者主要涉及组织人际关系中的伦理和道德:本文旨在反思各组织是否有必要通过公司治理和代理理论,在股东和代理人的目标一致的情况下,在其相互关系中打击腐败,实现对社会负责的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信