Implementation of a health information technology safety classification system in the Veterans Health Administration's Informatics Patient Safety Office.

Danielle Kato, Joe Lucas, Dean F. Sittig
{"title":"Implementation of a health information technology safety classification system in the Veterans Health Administration's Informatics Patient Safety Office.","authors":"Danielle Kato, Joe Lucas, Dean F. Sittig","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocae107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nImplement the 5-type health information technology (HIT) patient safety concern classification system for HIT patient safety issues reported to the Veterans Health Administration's Informatics Patient Safety Office.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nA team of informatics safety analysts retrospectively classified 1 year of HIT patient safety issues by type of HIT patient safety concern using consensus discussions. The processes established during retrospective classification were then applied to incoming HIT safety issues moving forward.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf 140 issues retrospectively reviewed, 124 met the classification criteria. The majority were HIT failures (eg, software defects) (33.1%) or configuration and implementation problems (29.8%). Unmet user needs and external system interactions accounted for 20.2% and 10.5%, respectively. Absence of HIT safety features accounted for 2.4% of issues, and 4% did not have enough information to classify.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe 5-type HIT safety concern classification framework generated actionable categories helping organizations effectively respond to HIT patient safety risks.","PeriodicalId":236137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Implement the 5-type health information technology (HIT) patient safety concern classification system for HIT patient safety issues reported to the Veterans Health Administration's Informatics Patient Safety Office. MATERIALS AND METHODS A team of informatics safety analysts retrospectively classified 1 year of HIT patient safety issues by type of HIT patient safety concern using consensus discussions. The processes established during retrospective classification were then applied to incoming HIT safety issues moving forward. RESULTS Of 140 issues retrospectively reviewed, 124 met the classification criteria. The majority were HIT failures (eg, software defects) (33.1%) or configuration and implementation problems (29.8%). Unmet user needs and external system interactions accounted for 20.2% and 10.5%, respectively. Absence of HIT safety features accounted for 2.4% of issues, and 4% did not have enough information to classify. CONCLUSION The 5-type HIT safety concern classification framework generated actionable categories helping organizations effectively respond to HIT patient safety risks.
在退伍军人健康管理局信息学患者安全办公室实施医疗信息技术安全分类系统。
材料和方法由信息学安全分析师组成的团队通过协商一致的讨论方式,按照 HIT 患者安全问题的类型对 1 年的 HIT 患者安全问题进行了回顾性分类。结果在回顾性审查的 140 个问题中,有 124 个符合分类标准。其中大部分是 HIT 故障(如软件缺陷)(33.1%)或配置和实施问题(29.8%)。未满足用户需求和外部系统交互分别占 20.2% 和 10.5%。缺乏 HIT 安全功能的问题占 2.4%,没有足够信息进行分类的问题占 4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信