Performance Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Classifying Cybersecurity Attacks in IoT Networks

Fray L. Becerra-Suarez, Victor A. Tuesta-Monteza, Heber I. Mejia-Cabrera, Juan Arcila-Diaz
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Classifying Cybersecurity Attacks in IoT Networks","authors":"Fray L. Becerra-Suarez, Victor A. Tuesta-Monteza, Heber I. Mejia-Cabrera, Juan Arcila-Diaz","doi":"10.3390/informatics11020032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Internet of Things (IoT) presents great potential in various fields such as home automation, healthcare, and industry, among others, but its infrastructure, the use of open source code, and lack of software updates make it vulnerable to cyberattacks that can compromise access to data and services, thus making it an attractive target for hackers. The complexity of cyberattacks has increased, posing a greater threat to public and private organizations. This study evaluated the performance of deep learning models for classifying cybersecurity attacks in IoT networks, using the CICIoT2023 dataset. Three architectures based on DNN, LSTM, and CNN were compared, highlighting their differences in layers and activation functions. The results show that the CNN architecture outperformed the others in accuracy and computational efficiency, with an accuracy rate of 99.10% for multiclass classification and 99.40% for binary classification. The importance of data standardization and proper hyperparameter selection is emphasized. These results demonstrate that the CNN-based model emerges as a promising option for detecting cyber threats in IoT environments, supporting the relevance of deep learning in IoT network security.","PeriodicalId":507941,"journal":{"name":"Informatics","volume":"36 39","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics11020032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) presents great potential in various fields such as home automation, healthcare, and industry, among others, but its infrastructure, the use of open source code, and lack of software updates make it vulnerable to cyberattacks that can compromise access to data and services, thus making it an attractive target for hackers. The complexity of cyberattacks has increased, posing a greater threat to public and private organizations. This study evaluated the performance of deep learning models for classifying cybersecurity attacks in IoT networks, using the CICIoT2023 dataset. Three architectures based on DNN, LSTM, and CNN were compared, highlighting their differences in layers and activation functions. The results show that the CNN architecture outperformed the others in accuracy and computational efficiency, with an accuracy rate of 99.10% for multiclass classification and 99.40% for binary classification. The importance of data standardization and proper hyperparameter selection is emphasized. These results demonstrate that the CNN-based model emerges as a promising option for detecting cyber threats in IoT environments, supporting the relevance of deep learning in IoT network security.
用于对物联网网络中的网络安全攻击进行分类的深度学习模型性能评估
物联网(IoT)在家庭自动化、医疗保健和工业等多个领域具有巨大潜力,但其基础设施、开放源代码的使用以及软件更新的缺乏,使其容易受到网络攻击,从而影响数据和服务的访问,成为黑客的攻击目标。网络攻击的复杂性不断增加,对公共和私营组织构成了更大的威胁。本研究利用 CICIoT2023 数据集,评估了深度学习模型对物联网网络中的网络安全攻击进行分类的性能。对基于 DNN、LSTM 和 CNN 的三种架构进行了比较,突出了它们在层和激活函数上的差异。结果表明,CNN 架构在准确率和计算效率方面优于其他架构,其多类分类准确率为 99.10%,二元分类准确率为 99.40%。数据标准化和正确选择超参数的重要性得到了强调。这些结果表明,基于 CNN 的模型是检测物联网环境中网络威胁的一个有前途的选择,支持了深度学习在物联网网络安全中的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信