Oh, the Places They’ll Go: A Geographic Analysis of Gubernatorial Campaigns

Ryan E. Voris, Austin Trantham
{"title":"Oh, the Places They’ll Go: A Geographic Analysis of Gubernatorial Campaigns","authors":"Ryan E. Voris, Austin Trantham","doi":"10.1177/1532673x241253259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geography has long played a significant role in American electoral politics. Candidates engage in “retail politics” by visiting fairs, festivals, schools, churches, and businesses, to meet and greet potential voters. However, systematically understanding where candidates are actually going has plagued prior work due to small sample sizes and lack of data availability. Presidential elections have been used with success in previous scholarship, but there are few viable candidates to compare within a single cycle. Utilizing competitive gubernatorial elections, this work attempts to address these deficiencies by utilizing social media posts to track multiple candidates in real-time across the 2018 campaign cycle at the state level. The paper tests competing theories of candidate engagement regarding travel decisions: do candidates (1) focus their attention on their partisan base or (2) try to attract independent or “swing” voters? Following an original and intensive data collection effort, we identified location-specific information for over 4700 campaign stops made by major-party candidates across seventeen states. Our results lend support to candidates spending time with their respective bases of partisan support, with Republicans going to rural areas with non-college educated individuals while Democrats travel to urban counties with a more diverse electorate.","PeriodicalId":504563,"journal":{"name":"American Politics Research","volume":"49 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Politics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x241253259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geography has long played a significant role in American electoral politics. Candidates engage in “retail politics” by visiting fairs, festivals, schools, churches, and businesses, to meet and greet potential voters. However, systematically understanding where candidates are actually going has plagued prior work due to small sample sizes and lack of data availability. Presidential elections have been used with success in previous scholarship, but there are few viable candidates to compare within a single cycle. Utilizing competitive gubernatorial elections, this work attempts to address these deficiencies by utilizing social media posts to track multiple candidates in real-time across the 2018 campaign cycle at the state level. The paper tests competing theories of candidate engagement regarding travel decisions: do candidates (1) focus their attention on their partisan base or (2) try to attract independent or “swing” voters? Following an original and intensive data collection effort, we identified location-specific information for over 4700 campaign stops made by major-party candidates across seventeen states. Our results lend support to candidates spending time with their respective bases of partisan support, with Republicans going to rural areas with non-college educated individuals while Democrats travel to urban counties with a more diverse electorate.
哦,他们要去的地方:州长竞选的地理分析
长期以来,地理因素在美国选举政治中发挥着重要作用。候选人通过走访集市、节日、学校、教堂和企业,与潜在选民见面并打招呼,从而参与 "零售政治"。然而,由于样本量小和缺乏可用数据,系统地了解候选人的实际去向一直困扰着以往的研究工作。总统选举在以往的研究中取得了成功,但在一个周期内可比较的可行候选人很少。本研究利用竞争激烈的州长选举,通过社交媒体帖子实时跟踪 2018 年州一级竞选周期内的多位候选人,试图解决这些不足。本文检验了候选人参与旅行决策的竞争理论:候选人是(1)将注意力集中在党派基础上,还是(2)试图吸引独立或 "摇摆 "选民?经过大量的原始数据收集工作,我们确定了主要政党候选人在 17 个州的 4700 多次竞选活动的具体地点信息。我们的研究结果支持候选人将时间花在各自的党派支持基础上,共和党人会前往非大学教育背景的农村地区,而民主党人则会前往拥有更多样化选民的城市地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信