The “House of Trust”. A framework for quality healthcare and leadership.

K. Vanhaecht, Peter Lachman, C. Van der Auwera, D. Seys, F. Claessens, M. Panella, D. De Ridder
{"title":"The “House of Trust”. A framework for quality healthcare and leadership.","authors":"K. Vanhaecht, Peter Lachman, C. Van der Auwera, D. Seys, F. Claessens, M. Panella, D. De Ridder","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.149711.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In healthcare, improvement leaders have been inspired by the frameworks from industry which have been adapted into control systems and certifications to improve quality of care for people. To address the challenge to regain trust in healthcare design and delivery, we propose a conceptual framework, i.e. the “House of Trust”. This House brings together the Juran Trilogy, the emerging concept of co-production in quality management and the multidimensional definition of quality, which describes core values as an integral part of the system to deliver person- and kin-centered care. In the “House of Trust” patients, their kin, healthcare providers, executives and managers feel at home, with a sense of belonging. If we want to build a care organization that inspires and radiates confidence to all stakeholders, highlighting the basic interactions between front- and back-office is required. An organization with both well-organized back- and front-offices can enable all to benefit from the trust each of them needs and deserves. A quality system does not depend on government inspection and regulations nor on external accreditation to develop itself into a House of Trust. Success will only be achieved if all involved continuously question themselves about the technical dimensions of quality and their core values during the “moment of truth”.","PeriodicalId":504605,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.149711.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In healthcare, improvement leaders have been inspired by the frameworks from industry which have been adapted into control systems and certifications to improve quality of care for people. To address the challenge to regain trust in healthcare design and delivery, we propose a conceptual framework, i.e. the “House of Trust”. This House brings together the Juran Trilogy, the emerging concept of co-production in quality management and the multidimensional definition of quality, which describes core values as an integral part of the system to deliver person- and kin-centered care. In the “House of Trust” patients, their kin, healthcare providers, executives and managers feel at home, with a sense of belonging. If we want to build a care organization that inspires and radiates confidence to all stakeholders, highlighting the basic interactions between front- and back-office is required. An organization with both well-organized back- and front-offices can enable all to benefit from the trust each of them needs and deserves. A quality system does not depend on government inspection and regulations nor on external accreditation to develop itself into a House of Trust. Success will only be achieved if all involved continuously question themselves about the technical dimensions of quality and their core values during the “moment of truth”.
信任之屋"。优质医疗保健和领导力框架。
在医疗保健领域,改进工作的领导者受到了来自工业界的框架的启发,这些框架已被调整为控制系统和认证,以提高人们的医疗保健质量。为了应对在医疗保健设计和提供过程中重获信任的挑战,我们提出了一个概念框架,即 "信任之家"。信任之家 "汇集了 "朱兰三部曲"、质量管理中新兴的 "共同生产 "概念以及质量的多维定义,其中将核心价值描述为提供以人为本和以亲属为本的医疗服务体系的组成部分。在 "信任之家",患者、患者亲属、医疗服务提供者、行政人员和管理人员都有宾至如归的归属感。如果我们想建立一个能让所有利益相关者感到鼓舞和充满信心的医疗机构,就必须突出前台和后台之间的基本互动。一个同时拥有组织良好的后台和前台的组织,能够让所有人都受益于每个人所需要和应得的信任。一个质量体系要发展成为 "信任之家",并不依赖于政府的检查和规定,也不依赖于外部的认证。只有所有相关人员在 "关键时刻 "不断质疑自己的质量技术水平和核心价值观,才能取得成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信