Hospital cohort study on survival predictors for intubated coronavirus disease 2019 patients

Fabiola Jahn Deschamps, Paulo Sergio da Silva Deschamps, Laura Correa da Silva, Ellen Karkow Blos, Eduardo Schmidt Savoldi, Maria Julia Coelho Garcia, Guilherme Jönck Staub, F. R. D. Rocha, G. Z. Laporta
{"title":"Hospital cohort study on survival predictors for intubated coronavirus disease 2019 patients","authors":"Fabiola Jahn Deschamps, Paulo Sergio da Silva Deschamps, Laura Correa da Silva, Ellen Karkow Blos, Eduardo Schmidt Savoldi, Maria Julia Coelho Garcia, Guilherme Jönck Staub, F. R. D. Rocha, G. Z. Laporta","doi":"10.1590/1806-9282.20231464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the predictors of survival among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 who underwent tracheal intubation, as part of a hospital cohort study. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study in the Rio do Sul County Hospital, Santa Catarina, Brazil, from April 2020 to May 2021, focused on patients aged 18 years or older intubated for coronavirus disease 2019. We assessed the 90-day survival of intubated patients by estimating the hazard ratio using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: The study included 132 participants, with an average age of approximately 60 years. Tracheal intubation was successfully accomplished in 97% of cases within two attempts. The overall mortality rate was 62.9%. Notably, mortality rates were significantly higher in patients aged over 60 years (hazard ratio=2.57; 95%CI 1.54–4.29; p<0.001), those with blood oxygen saturation below 85% (hazard ratio=1.92; 95%CI 1.03–3.57; p=0.04), instances where tracheal intubation was carried out using a conventional laryngoscope (hazard ratio=2.59; 95%CI 1.22–5.48; p=0.013), and when performed by emergency physicians (hazard ratio=3.96; 95%CI 1.51–10.4; p=0.005). CONCLUSION: Our analysis unveiled that the risk of death in intubated coronavirus disease 2019 patients is four times higher when an emergency physician, as opposed to an anesthesiologist, leads the tracheal intubation team.","PeriodicalId":447105,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira","volume":"10 41","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20231464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the predictors of survival among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 who underwent tracheal intubation, as part of a hospital cohort study. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study in the Rio do Sul County Hospital, Santa Catarina, Brazil, from April 2020 to May 2021, focused on patients aged 18 years or older intubated for coronavirus disease 2019. We assessed the 90-day survival of intubated patients by estimating the hazard ratio using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: The study included 132 participants, with an average age of approximately 60 years. Tracheal intubation was successfully accomplished in 97% of cases within two attempts. The overall mortality rate was 62.9%. Notably, mortality rates were significantly higher in patients aged over 60 years (hazard ratio=2.57; 95%CI 1.54–4.29; p<0.001), those with blood oxygen saturation below 85% (hazard ratio=1.92; 95%CI 1.03–3.57; p=0.04), instances where tracheal intubation was carried out using a conventional laryngoscope (hazard ratio=2.59; 95%CI 1.22–5.48; p=0.013), and when performed by emergency physicians (hazard ratio=3.96; 95%CI 1.51–10.4; p=0.005). CONCLUSION: Our analysis unveiled that the risk of death in intubated coronavirus disease 2019 patients is four times higher when an emergency physician, as opposed to an anesthesiologist, leads the tracheal intubation team.
关于 2019 年冠状病毒病插管患者生存预测因素的医院队列研究
摘要 目的:本研究的目的是作为医院队列研究的一部分,评估接受气管插管的 2019 年冠状病毒疾病患者的生存预测因素。方法:这项回顾性队列研究于 2020 年 4 月至 2021 年 5 月在巴西圣卡塔琳娜州里约杜苏尔县医院进行,主要针对因冠状病毒病 2019 而进行气管插管的 18 岁或以上患者。我们通过使用 Cox 比例危险回归模型估算危险比来评估插管患者的 90 天存活率。结果:该研究包括132名参与者,平均年龄约为60岁。97%的病例在两次尝试内成功完成气管插管。总死亡率为 62.9%。值得注意的是,60 岁以上的患者死亡率明显更高(危险比=2.57;95%CI 1.54-4.29;p<0.001),血氧饱和度低于 85% 的患者死亡率明显更高(危险比=1.92;95%CI 1.03-3.57;p=0.04),气管插管失败的患者死亡率明显更高(危险比=2.57;95%CI 1.54-4.29;p<0.001)。04)、使用传统喉镜进行气管插管的情况(危险比=2.59;95%CI 1.22-5.48;p=0.013)以及由急诊医生进行气管插管的情况(危险比=3.96;95%CI 1.51-10.4;p=0.005)。结论:我们的分析揭示了2019年冠状病毒病插管患者的死亡风险在由急诊科医生而非麻醉科医生领导气管插管团队时要高出四倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信