Person-centered abortion care scale: Validation for medication abortion in the United States.

May Sudhinaraset, Jessica D Gipson, Michelle Kao Nakphong, Brenda Soun, Patience Afulani, Ushma Upadhyay, Rajita Patil
{"title":"Person-centered abortion care scale: Validation for medication abortion in the United States.","authors":"May Sudhinaraset, Jessica D Gipson, Michelle Kao Nakphong, Brenda Soun, Patience Afulani, Ushma Upadhyay, Rajita Patil","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Medication abortions now make up the majority of abortions in the US, with new service delivery models such as telehealth; however, it is unclear how this may impact patient experiences. The objective of the study is to adapt and validate a person-centered abortion care (PCAC) scale for medication abortions that was developed in a global South context (Kenya) for use in the United States.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study includes medication abortion patients from a hospital-based clinic who had one of two modes of service delivery: 1) telemedicine with no physical exam or ultrasound; or 2) in-person with clinic-based exams and ultrasounds. We conducted a sequential approach to scale development including: 1) defining constructs and item generation; 2) expert reviews; 3) cognitive interviews (n=12); 4) survey development and online survey data collection (N=182, including 45 telemedicine patients and 137 in-person patients); and 5) psychometric analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory factor analyses identified 29-items for the US-PCAC scale with three subscales: 1) Respect & Dignity (10 items), 2) Responsive & Supportive Care (9 items for the full scale, 1 additional mode-specific item each for in-person and telemedicine), and 3) Communication & Autonomy (10 items for the full scale, 1 additional item for telemedicine). The US-PCAC had high content, construct, and criterion validity. It also had high reliability, with a standardized alpha for the full 29-item US-PCAC scale of 0.95. The US-PCAC score was associated with overall satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found high validity and reliability of a newly-developed person-centered abortion care scale for use in the US. As medication abortion provision expands, this scale can be used in quality improvement efforts.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This study found high validity and reliability of a newly-developed person-centered care scale for use in the United States for in-person and telemedicine medication abortion.</p>","PeriodicalId":93955,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Medication abortions now make up the majority of abortions in the US, with new service delivery models such as telehealth; however, it is unclear how this may impact patient experiences. The objective of the study is to adapt and validate a person-centered abortion care (PCAC) scale for medication abortions that was developed in a global South context (Kenya) for use in the United States.

Study design: This study includes medication abortion patients from a hospital-based clinic who had one of two modes of service delivery: 1) telemedicine with no physical exam or ultrasound; or 2) in-person with clinic-based exams and ultrasounds. We conducted a sequential approach to scale development including: 1) defining constructs and item generation; 2) expert reviews; 3) cognitive interviews (n=12); 4) survey development and online survey data collection (N=182, including 45 telemedicine patients and 137 in-person patients); and 5) psychometric analyses.

Results: Exploratory factor analyses identified 29-items for the US-PCAC scale with three subscales: 1) Respect & Dignity (10 items), 2) Responsive & Supportive Care (9 items for the full scale, 1 additional mode-specific item each for in-person and telemedicine), and 3) Communication & Autonomy (10 items for the full scale, 1 additional item for telemedicine). The US-PCAC had high content, construct, and criterion validity. It also had high reliability, with a standardized alpha for the full 29-item US-PCAC scale of 0.95. The US-PCAC score was associated with overall satisfaction.

Conclusion: This study found high validity and reliability of a newly-developed person-centered abortion care scale for use in the US. As medication abortion provision expands, this scale can be used in quality improvement efforts.

Implications: This study found high validity and reliability of a newly-developed person-centered care scale for use in the United States for in-person and telemedicine medication abortion.

以人为本的人工流产护理量表:美国药物流产验证。
目的:在美国,随着远程医疗等新服务模式的出现,药物流产目前已占流产的大多数;然而,目前尚不清楚这可能会对患者的体验产生何种影响。本研究的目的是调整和验证以人为本的药物流产护理量表(PCAC),该量表是在全球南方国家(肯尼亚)开发的,可在美国使用:研究设计:本研究包括一家医院诊所的药物流产患者,他们接受了两种服务模式中的一种:1)无体格检查或超声波检查的远程医疗;或 2)有诊所检查和超声波检查的面对面服务。我们采用了一种循序渐进的量表开发方法,包括1)定义构造和项目生成;2)专家评审;3)认知访谈(12 人);4)调查开发和在线调查数据收集(182 人,包括 45 名远程医疗患者和 137 名亲临现场的患者);5)心理测量分析:探索性因子分析为美国-PCAC量表确定了29个项目,其中包括三个子量表:1)尊重与尊严(10个项目);2)响应与支持性护理(全量表9个项目,面诊和远程医疗各增加1个特定模式项目);3)沟通与自主(全量表10个项目,远程医疗增加1个项目)。US-PCAC 具有较高的内容效度、结构效度和标准效度。它的信度也很高,全量表 29 个项目的标准化α值为 0.95。US-PCAC得分与总体满意度相关:本研究发现,在美国使用新开发的以人为本的人工流产护理量表具有很高的有效性和可靠性。随着药物流产服务的扩大,该量表可用于质量改进工作:本研究发现,新开发的以人为本的护理量表具有很高的有效性和可靠性,适用于美国的现场和远程医疗药物流产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信