Ambulatory Quality Improvement Despite COVID-19: Blueprint for a Successful System for Continuous Improvement.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal for Healthcare Quality Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000444
Anne H VanBuren, Tricia M Montgomery, John R McConaghy, Jeffrey Lawrence, Nazhat Taj-Schaal, Melissa Unger, Nate R Rogers
{"title":"Ambulatory Quality Improvement Despite COVID-19: Blueprint for a Successful System for Continuous Improvement.","authors":"Anne H VanBuren, Tricia M Montgomery, John R McConaghy, Jeffrey Lawrence, Nazhat Taj-Schaal, Melissa Unger, Nate R Rogers","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In this article, we describe our experience developing and implementing a multipronged approach to improve performance across a strategic subset of quality measures within primary care. Detailed techniques include data visualization and analytics, process reengineering, team engagement, visual project management, continuous improvement methods and training, and incentives and recognition. We achieved positive change across 12 high priority measures which we deemed the \"High Value Framework (HVF)\" by fostering a collaborative, nonpunitive, problem-solving culture. We focused on measures that had the greatest potential for impact from a clinical, reimbursement, and reputational perspective. More importantly, we sustained gains despite the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, thereby demonstrating programmatic resilience and high process reliability. This systematic approach serves as a practical blueprint for other healthcare entities seeking to navigate the complexities of quality improvement in a dynamic environment. The model provides a strategic framework for prioritizing and standardizing quality measures, effectively engaging stakeholders, and managing organizational change. Our model emerged from a need to address real-world operational challenges, rather than as an academic or theoretical exercise, and was developed independently of existing literature on measure prioritization and standardization at the time of its inception.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":"251-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000444","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: In this article, we describe our experience developing and implementing a multipronged approach to improve performance across a strategic subset of quality measures within primary care. Detailed techniques include data visualization and analytics, process reengineering, team engagement, visual project management, continuous improvement methods and training, and incentives and recognition. We achieved positive change across 12 high priority measures which we deemed the "High Value Framework (HVF)" by fostering a collaborative, nonpunitive, problem-solving culture. We focused on measures that had the greatest potential for impact from a clinical, reimbursement, and reputational perspective. More importantly, we sustained gains despite the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, thereby demonstrating programmatic resilience and high process reliability. This systematic approach serves as a practical blueprint for other healthcare entities seeking to navigate the complexities of quality improvement in a dynamic environment. The model provides a strategic framework for prioritizing and standardizing quality measures, effectively engaging stakeholders, and managing organizational change. Our model emerged from a need to address real-world operational challenges, rather than as an academic or theoretical exercise, and was developed independently of existing literature on measure prioritization and standardization at the time of its inception.

门诊质量改进,尽管有 COVID-19:持续改进系统的成功蓝图。
摘要:本文介绍了我们在制定和实施多管齐下的方法以提高初级医疗质量衡量标准战略子集的绩效方面的经验。具体技术包括数据可视化和分析、流程再造、团队参与、可视化项目管理、持续改进方法和培训以及激励和表彰。通过培养一种协作、非惩罚性、解决问题的文化,我们在 12 项高优先级措施方面取得了积极的变化,并将其视为 "高价值框架(HVF)"。我们重点关注那些从临床、报销和声誉角度来看最有可能产生影响的措施。更重要的是,尽管 COVID-19 大流行带来了挑战,但我们仍保持了成果,从而展示了计划的弹性和流程的高度可靠性。这一系统化方法为其他医疗保健机构在动态环境中应对复杂的质量改进工作提供了实用蓝图。该模型为确定质量措施的优先次序和标准化、有效吸引利益相关者参与以及管理组织变革提供了一个战略框架。我们的模型源于解决实际运营挑战的需要,而不是作为一项学术或理论工作,并且在建立之初就独立于有关措施优先化和标准化的现有文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信