Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and penetration of self-etch sealant with and without enamel deproteinization: an in vitro study.

IF 2.3 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
M Agarwal, K D Gupta, R Yeluri
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and penetration of self-etch sealant with and without enamel deproteinization: an in vitro study.","authors":"M Agarwal, K D Gupta, R Yeluri","doi":"10.1007/s40368-024-00907-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the shear bond strength and penetration ability of self-etch sealant with and without enamel deproteinization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 37 sound extracted teeth were selected and 31 teeth were used for testing shear bond strength of self-etch sealant. For this, crowns portions of selected teeth were cut longitudinally with a diamond disc into a mesial and distal half, thereby yielding 62 samples. They were further divided into two groups; in Group 1, samples were deproteinised with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and a sealant cylinder was built on the proximal surface. In Group 2, sealant cylinders were built without deproteinising the surface. Shear bond strength was tested using Universal Testing Machine. The remaining six teeth were used for penetration evaluation of self-etch sealant. In Group 1, the occlusal surface was deproteinised with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and self-etch sealant was directly applied. In Group 2, sealant was applied without deproteinisation. The samples obtained after sectioning were observed under scanning electron microscope for sealant penetration. Mann-Whitney test and Chi-square analysis were utilised for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the shear bond strength of the two groups was statistically not significant (p = 0.23). However, the comparison of % penetration revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deproteinising the enamel surface prior to application of self-etch sealant enhanced the penetration ability of the sealant but did not show any effect on shear bond strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":47603,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"491-500"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-024-00907-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare the shear bond strength and penetration ability of self-etch sealant with and without enamel deproteinization.

Materials and methods: A total of 37 sound extracted teeth were selected and 31 teeth were used for testing shear bond strength of self-etch sealant. For this, crowns portions of selected teeth were cut longitudinally with a diamond disc into a mesial and distal half, thereby yielding 62 samples. They were further divided into two groups; in Group 1, samples were deproteinised with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and a sealant cylinder was built on the proximal surface. In Group 2, sealant cylinders were built without deproteinising the surface. Shear bond strength was tested using Universal Testing Machine. The remaining six teeth were used for penetration evaluation of self-etch sealant. In Group 1, the occlusal surface was deproteinised with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and self-etch sealant was directly applied. In Group 2, sealant was applied without deproteinisation. The samples obtained after sectioning were observed under scanning electron microscope for sealant penetration. Mann-Whitney test and Chi-square analysis were utilised for statistical analysis.

Results: The results showed that the shear bond strength of the two groups was statistically not significant (p = 0.23). However, the comparison of % penetration revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.016).

Conclusion: Deproteinising the enamel surface prior to application of self-etch sealant enhanced the penetration ability of the sealant but did not show any effect on shear bond strength.

有无釉质脱蛋白自酸蚀封闭剂剪切粘接强度和渗透性的比较评估:体外研究。
目的:比较有无釉质脱蛋白的自酸蚀封闭剂的剪切粘接强度和渗透能力:共选择了 37 颗完好的拔牙,其中 31 颗用于测试自酸蚀密封剂的剪切粘接强度。为此,用金刚石圆盘将所选牙齿的牙冠部分纵向切成中间和远端两半,从而得到 62 个样本。这些样本又被分为两组:第一组样本用 5.25% 的次氯酸钠进行去蛋白处理,并在近端表面制作密封剂圆柱体。在第 2 组中,不对表面进行脱蛋白处理,直接制作密封胶圆柱体。使用万能试验机测试剪切粘接强度。其余六颗牙齿用于评估自酸蚀密封剂的渗透性。在第一组中,用 5.25% 的次氯酸钠对咬合面进行去蛋白处理,然后直接涂抹自酸蚀密封剂。在第二组中,密封剂未经脱蛋白处理。切片后的样本在扫描电子显微镜下观察密封剂的渗透情况。统计分析采用了曼-惠特尼检验和卡方分析:结果表明,两组的剪切粘接强度在统计学上无显著差异(P = 0.23)。然而,渗透率的比较显示两组之间存在显著差异(p = 0.016):结论:在使用自酸蚀封闭剂前对牙釉质表面进行脱蛋白处理可提高封闭剂的渗透能力,但对剪切粘接强度没有任何影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The aim and scope of European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) is to promote research in all aspects of dentistry for children, including interceptive orthodontics and studies on children and young adults with special needs. The EAPD focuses on the publication and critical evaluation of clinical and basic science research related to children. The EAPD will consider clinical case series reports, followed by the relevant literature review, only where there are new and important findings of interest to Paediatric Dentistry and where details of techniques or treatment carried out and the success of such approaches are given.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信