Analysis of the performances of various controllers adopted in the biomedical field for blood glucose regulation: a case study of the type-1 diabetes.

Q3 Engineering
Isah Ndakara Abubakar, Moad Essabbar, Hajar Saikouk
{"title":"Analysis of the performances of various controllers adopted in the biomedical field for blood glucose regulation: a case study of the type-1 diabetes.","authors":"Isah Ndakara Abubakar, Moad Essabbar, Hajar Saikouk","doi":"10.1080/03091902.2024.2353036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetes remains a critical global health concern that necessitates urgent attention. The contemporary clinical approach to closed-loop care, specifically tailored for insulin-dependent patients, aims to precisely monitor blood glucose levels while mitigating the risks of hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia due to erroneous insulin dosing. This study seeks to address this life-threatening issue by assessing and comparing the performance of different controllers to achieve quicker settling and convergence rates with reduced steady-state errors, particularly in scenarios involving meal interruptions. The methodology involves the detection of plasma blood glucose levels, delivery of precise insulin doses to the actuator through a control architecture, and subsequent administration of the calculated insulin dosage to patients based on the control signal. Glucose-insulin dynamics were modelled using kinetics and mass balance equations from the Bergman minimal model. The simulation results revealed that the PID controller exhibited superior performance, maintaining blood glucose concentration around the preferred threshold ∼98.8% of the time, with a standard deviation of 2.50. This was followed by RST with a success rate of 98.5% and standard deviation of 5.00, SPC with a success rate of 58% and standard deviation of 2.99, SFC with a success rate of 55% and standard deviation of 10.08, and finally LCFB with a rate of 10% and significantly higher standard deviation of 64.55.</p>","PeriodicalId":39637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2024.2353036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diabetes remains a critical global health concern that necessitates urgent attention. The contemporary clinical approach to closed-loop care, specifically tailored for insulin-dependent patients, aims to precisely monitor blood glucose levels while mitigating the risks of hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia due to erroneous insulin dosing. This study seeks to address this life-threatening issue by assessing and comparing the performance of different controllers to achieve quicker settling and convergence rates with reduced steady-state errors, particularly in scenarios involving meal interruptions. The methodology involves the detection of plasma blood glucose levels, delivery of precise insulin doses to the actuator through a control architecture, and subsequent administration of the calculated insulin dosage to patients based on the control signal. Glucose-insulin dynamics were modelled using kinetics and mass balance equations from the Bergman minimal model. The simulation results revealed that the PID controller exhibited superior performance, maintaining blood glucose concentration around the preferred threshold ∼98.8% of the time, with a standard deviation of 2.50. This was followed by RST with a success rate of 98.5% and standard deviation of 5.00, SPC with a success rate of 58% and standard deviation of 2.99, SFC with a success rate of 55% and standard deviation of 10.08, and finally LCFB with a rate of 10% and significantly higher standard deviation of 64.55.

分析生物医学领域采用的各种血糖调节控制器的性能:1 型糖尿病案例研究。
糖尿病仍然是全球关注的重大健康问题,亟需引起重视。当代闭环护理的临床方法专门针对胰岛素依赖型患者,旨在精确监测血糖水平,同时降低因胰岛素剂量错误而导致的高血糖和低血糖风险。本研究旨在通过评估和比较不同控制器的性能来解决这一威胁生命的问题,以实现更快的稳定和收敛速度,减少稳态误差,尤其是在涉及用餐中断的情况下。该方法包括检测血浆血糖水平,通过控制架构向执行器输送精确的胰岛素剂量,以及随后根据控制信号向患者施用计算出的胰岛素剂量。使用伯格曼最小模型中的动力学和质量平衡方程对葡萄糖-胰岛素动态进行建模。模拟结果显示,PID 控制器表现出卓越的性能,在 98.8% 的时间内将血糖浓度维持在首选阈值附近,标准偏差为 2.50。其次是 RST,成功率为 98.5%,标准偏差为 5.00;SPC,成功率为 58%,标准偏差为 2.99;SFC,成功率为 55%,标准偏差为 10.08;最后是 LCFB,成功率为 10%,标准偏差高达 64.55。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology
Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology is an international, independent, multidisciplinary, bimonthly journal promoting an understanding of the physiological processes underlying disease processes and the appropriate application of technology. Features include authoritative review papers, the reporting of original research, and evaluation reports on new and existing techniques and devices. Each issue of the journal contains a comprehensive information service which provides news relevant to the world of medical technology, details of new products, book reviews, and selected contents of related journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信