Evolution of a laboratory mechanomyograph.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Zain Wedemeyer, Andrew Bowdle, Srdjan Jelacic, Aidan Lopez, Willis Silliman, Kelly E Michaelsen
{"title":"Evolution of a laboratory mechanomyograph.","authors":"Zain Wedemeyer, Andrew Bowdle, Srdjan Jelacic, Aidan Lopez, Willis Silliman, Kelly E Michaelsen","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01175-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mechanomyography is currently the accepted laboratory reference standard for quantitative neuromuscular blockade monitoring. Mechanomyographs are not commercially available. Previously, a mechanomyograph was built by our laboratory and used in several clinical studies. It was subsequently redesigned to improve its usability and functionality and to accommodate a wider range of hand sizes and shapes using an iterative design process. Each version of the redesigned device was initially tested for usability and functionality in the lab with the investigators as subjects without electrical stimulation. The redesigned devices were then assessed on patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia without neuromuscular blocking drugs. Since the patients were not paralyzed, the expected train-of-four ratio was 1.0. The device accuracy and precision were represented by the train-of-four ratio mean and standard deviation. If issues with the device's useability or functionality were discovered, changes were made, and the redesign processes repeated. The final mechanomyograph design was used to collect 2,362 train-of-four ratios from 21 patients. The mean and standard deviation of the train-of-four ratios were 0.99 ± 0.030. Additionally, the final mechanomyograph design was easier to use and adjust than the original design and fit a wider range of hand sizes. The final design also reduced the frequency of adjustments and the time needed for adjustments, facilitating data collection during a surgical procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01175-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mechanomyography is currently the accepted laboratory reference standard for quantitative neuromuscular blockade monitoring. Mechanomyographs are not commercially available. Previously, a mechanomyograph was built by our laboratory and used in several clinical studies. It was subsequently redesigned to improve its usability and functionality and to accommodate a wider range of hand sizes and shapes using an iterative design process. Each version of the redesigned device was initially tested for usability and functionality in the lab with the investigators as subjects without electrical stimulation. The redesigned devices were then assessed on patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia without neuromuscular blocking drugs. Since the patients were not paralyzed, the expected train-of-four ratio was 1.0. The device accuracy and precision were represented by the train-of-four ratio mean and standard deviation. If issues with the device's useability or functionality were discovered, changes were made, and the redesign processes repeated. The final mechanomyograph design was used to collect 2,362 train-of-four ratios from 21 patients. The mean and standard deviation of the train-of-four ratios were 0.99 ± 0.030. Additionally, the final mechanomyograph design was easier to use and adjust than the original design and fit a wider range of hand sizes. The final design also reduced the frequency of adjustments and the time needed for adjustments, facilitating data collection during a surgical procedure.

Abstract Image

实验室机械测量仪的演变
机械肌电图是目前公认的定量神经肌肉阻滞监测的实验室参考标准。目前市场上还没有机械肌电图仪。以前,我们实验室曾制造过一台机械肌电图仪,并用于多项临床研究。随后,我们对该设备进行了重新设计,以提高其可用性和功能性,并通过迭代设计过程来适应更广泛的手部尺寸和形状。重新设计的每个版本的设备最初都在实验室进行了可用性和功能测试,研究人员作为受试者,在没有电刺激的情况下进行测试。然后,在不使用神经肌肉阻断药物的全身麻醉下对接受择期手术的患者进行了重新设计的设备评估。由于患者没有瘫痪,因此预期的四次训练比为 1.0。装置的准确度和精确度由四次训练比的平均值和标准偏差表示。如果发现装置的可用性或功能存在问题,则进行修改,并重复重新设计过程。最终的机械肌电图设计用于收集 21 名患者的 2362 次四次训练比值。四次训练比的平均值和标准偏差为 0.99 ± 0.030。此外,最终的机械肌电图设计比原始设计更易于使用和调整,适合的手掌尺寸范围也更广。最终设计还减少了调整频率和调整所需的时间,便于在手术过程中收集数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信