Visit Experience and Fulfillment of Care Needs in Primary Care Differs for Video Visits Compared to In-person and Chat Visits.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-08781-z
Daniel Söderberg, Stephanie E Bonn, Linnea Sjöblom, Anna Dahlgren, Irene Muli, Isis Amer-Wåhlin, Bo C Bertilson, Nasim Farrokhnia, Helena Hvitfeldt, Marina Taloyan, Maria Hägglund, Ylva Trolle Lagerros
{"title":"Visit Experience and Fulfillment of Care Needs in Primary Care Differs for Video Visits Compared to In-person and Chat Visits.","authors":"Daniel Söderberg, Stephanie E Bonn, Linnea Sjöblom, Anna Dahlgren, Irene Muli, Isis Amer-Wåhlin, Bo C Bertilson, Nasim Farrokhnia, Helena Hvitfeldt, Marina Taloyan, Maria Hägglund, Ylva Trolle Lagerros","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-08781-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of research comparing patient experience and to what extent patients' care needs are fulfilled in telemedicine compared to in-person care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate if patient experience and fulfillment of care needs differ between video and chat visits with direct to consumer telemedicine providers compared to in-person visits.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults visiting a primary care physician in person or via chat or video in Region Stockholm, Sweden, October 2020-May 2021.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Patient-reported visit experience and fulfillment of care needs.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>The sample included 3315 patients who had an in-person (1950), video (844), or chat (521) visit. Response rates were 42% for in-person visitors and 41% for telemedicine visitors. Patients were 18-97 years old, mean age of 51 years, and 66% were female. In-person visitors reported the most positive patient experience (\"To a very high degree\" or \"Yes, completely\") for being listened to (64%), being treated with care (64%), and feeling trust and confidence in the health care professional (76%). Chat visitors reported the most positive patient experience for being given enough time (61%) and having care needs fulfilled during the care visit (76%). Video visitors had the largest proportion of respondents choosing \"To a very low degree\" or \"No, not at all\" for all visit experience measures. There were statistically significant differences in the distribution of visit experiences between in-person, video, and chat visits for all visit experience measures (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Video visits were associated with a more negative visit experience and lower fulfillment of care needs than in-person visits. Chat visits were associated with a similar patient experience and fulfillment of care needs as in-person visits. Chat visits may be a viable alternative to in-person visits for selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2881-2887"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08781-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of research comparing patient experience and to what extent patients' care needs are fulfilled in telemedicine compared to in-person care.

Objective: To investigate if patient experience and fulfillment of care needs differ between video and chat visits with direct to consumer telemedicine providers compared to in-person visits.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Participants: Adults visiting a primary care physician in person or via chat or video in Region Stockholm, Sweden, October 2020-May 2021.

Main measures: Patient-reported visit experience and fulfillment of care needs.

Key results: The sample included 3315 patients who had an in-person (1950), video (844), or chat (521) visit. Response rates were 42% for in-person visitors and 41% for telemedicine visitors. Patients were 18-97 years old, mean age of 51 years, and 66% were female. In-person visitors reported the most positive patient experience ("To a very high degree" or "Yes, completely") for being listened to (64%), being treated with care (64%), and feeling trust and confidence in the health care professional (76%). Chat visitors reported the most positive patient experience for being given enough time (61%) and having care needs fulfilled during the care visit (76%). Video visitors had the largest proportion of respondents choosing "To a very low degree" or "No, not at all" for all visit experience measures. There were statistically significant differences in the distribution of visit experiences between in-person, video, and chat visits for all visit experience measures (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Video visits were associated with a more negative visit experience and lower fulfillment of care needs than in-person visits. Chat visits were associated with a similar patient experience and fulfillment of care needs as in-person visits. Chat visits may be a viable alternative to in-person visits for selected patients.

Abstract Image

视频就诊与面谈和聊天就诊相比,初级保健的就诊体验和护理需求的满足程度有所不同。
背景:缺乏对患者体验的比较研究,也缺乏对远程医疗与面对面医疗相比在多大程度上满足了患者的护理需求的比较研究:调查患者在与直接面向消费者的远程医疗提供者进行视频和聊天就诊时,其就诊体验和护理需求的满足程度是否与面对面就诊有所不同:设计:横断面研究:2020年10月至2021年5月期间,在瑞典斯德哥尔摩地区亲自或通过聊天或视频访问初级保健医生的成年人:患者报告的就诊体验和护理需求的满足情况:样本包括 3315 名患者,他们分别接受了面诊(1950 人)、视频(844 人)或聊天(521 人)。亲诊患者的回复率为 42%,远程医疗患者的回复率为 41%。患者年龄在 18-97 岁之间,平均年龄为 51 岁,66% 为女性。亲诊来访者报告的最积极的患者体验("非常积极 "或 "是的,完全积极")包括被倾听(64%)、被关怀(64%)以及对医护人员的信任和信心(76%)。聊天来访者在获得足够时间(61%)和在护理访问中满足护理需求(76%)方面的患者体验最为积极。在所有就诊体验指标中,视频来访者选择 "程度很低 "或 "没有,完全没有 "的比例最高。在所有探访体验指标中,亲自探访、视频探访和聊天探访之间的探访体验分布存在明显的统计学差异(P 结论):与面对面就诊相比,视频就诊的负面就诊体验更多,护理需求的满足程度更低。聊天就诊与面对面就诊相比,患者就诊体验和护理需求满足程度相似。对于特定患者而言,聊天就诊可能是替代亲临就诊的一种可行方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信