Risk of drug-induced delirium in older patients- a pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system database.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-26 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2357242
Boying Jia, Shuang Zhou, Jiayu Li, Liyan Wan, Ying Zhou, Yimin Cui
{"title":"Risk of drug-induced delirium in older patients- a pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system database.","authors":"Boying Jia, Shuang Zhou, Jiayu Li, Liyan Wan, Ying Zhou, Yimin Cui","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2357242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-induced delirium is known risk factors associated with increased morbidity and mortality in older patients. The objective was to evaluate the risk of drug-related delirium in older patients based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Delirium reports in older patients (age ≥65) extracted from the FAERS database using Open Vigil 2.1. The reported odds ratio and the proportional reported ratio were calculated to detect the adverse reaction signal of delirium. Combined with published evidence, suspected drugs were categorized as known, possible, or new potential delirium-risk-increasing drugs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 130,885 reports (including 28,850 delirium events and 1,857 drugs) analyzed for this study, 314 positive signal drugs were detected. Positive signal drugs are mainly concentrated on the drug of nervous system, cardiovascular system , alimentary tract and metabolism and anti-infectives for systemic use. Of the positive signal drugs, 26.11% (82/314) were known delirium-risk increasing drugs, 44.90% (141/314) were possible and 28.98% (91/314) were new potential.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Drug-induced delirium risk is prevalent in older patients, according to the FAERS. The risk level of drug-induced delirium should be taken into account to optimize drug therapy in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"79-87"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2357242","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Drug-induced delirium is known risk factors associated with increased morbidity and mortality in older patients. The objective was to evaluate the risk of drug-related delirium in older patients based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Research design and methods: Delirium reports in older patients (age ≥65) extracted from the FAERS database using Open Vigil 2.1. The reported odds ratio and the proportional reported ratio were calculated to detect the adverse reaction signal of delirium. Combined with published evidence, suspected drugs were categorized as known, possible, or new potential delirium-risk-increasing drugs.

Results: Of the 130,885 reports (including 28,850 delirium events and 1,857 drugs) analyzed for this study, 314 positive signal drugs were detected. Positive signal drugs are mainly concentrated on the drug of nervous system, cardiovascular system , alimentary tract and metabolism and anti-infectives for systemic use. Of the positive signal drugs, 26.11% (82/314) were known delirium-risk increasing drugs, 44.90% (141/314) were possible and 28.98% (91/314) were new potential.

Conclusion: Drug-induced delirium risk is prevalent in older patients, according to the FAERS. The risk level of drug-induced delirium should be taken into account to optimize drug therapy in clinical practice.

老年患者因药物引起谵妄的风险--美国食品药物管理局不良事件报告系统数据库药物警戒研究。
背景:药物引起的谵妄是与老年患者发病率和死亡率增加相关的众多已知风险因素之一。本研究的目的是根据美国食品药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)评估老年患者药物相关谵妄的风险:使用 Open Vigil 2.1 从 FAERS 数据库中提取 2004 年第 1 季度至 2021 年第 3 季度老年患者(年龄≥65 岁)的谵妄报告。计算报告的几率比例和比例比率,以检测谵妄的不良反应信号。结合已发表的证据,将可疑药物分为已知、可能或新的潜在谵妄风险增加药物:结果:在本研究分析的 130,885 份报告(包括 28,850 例谵妄事件和 1,857 种药物)中,发现了 314 种阳性信号药物。阳性信号药物主要集中在神经系统药物[n = 149,ROR 3.60,95% CI (3.56-3.64)]、心血管系统药物[n = 35,ROR 1.45,95% CI (1.43-1.47)]、消化道和代谢药物[n = 35,ROR 1.25,95% CI (1.23-1.26)]和全身用抗感染药物[n = 27,ROR 1.70,95% CI (1.66-1.74)]。在阳性信号药物中,26.11%(82/314)是已知的增加谵妄风险的药物[ROR 4.12,95%CI (3.85-4.41)],44.90%(141/314)是可能的药物[ROR 3.59,95%CI (3.37-3.83)],28.98%(91/314)是新的潜在药物[ROR 3.68,95%CI (3.22-4.21)]:结论:根据 FAERS,药物诱发谵妄的风险在老年患者中普遍存在。结论:根据 FAERS,药物诱发谵妄的风险在老年患者中普遍存在。在临床实践中,应考虑到药物诱发谵妄的风险水平,以优化药物治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信