Hematological toxicity of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer: a network meta-analysis and pharmacovigilance study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2348566
Haiying Ding, Weiben Xu, Mengfei Dai, Shujing Li, Wenxiu Xin, Yinghui Tong, Chaoneng He, Xiufang Mi, Zhajun Zhan, Luo Fang
{"title":"Hematological toxicity of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer: a network meta-analysis and pharmacovigilance study.","authors":"Haiying Ding, Weiben Xu, Mengfei Dai, Shujing Li, Wenxiu Xin, Yinghui Tong, Chaoneng He, Xiufang Mi, Zhajun Zhan, Luo Fang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2348566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to evaluate and compare the risk of hematological adverse events (AEs) associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Food and Drug Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for RCTs related to abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the risks of hematological AEs, and a disproportionality analysis was performed to detect signals of hematological AEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>16 RCTs comprising 16,350 breast cancer patients were included. Palbociclib and ribociclib had similar risks for hematological AEs, except a higher risk of grade 3-4 leukopenia observed with palbociclib (risk ratio [RR]: 7.84, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.33-41.28). Abemaciclib had a higher risk of anemia than both ribociclib (grade 1-4: RR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.25 - 3.96; grade 3-4: RR: 3.52, 95% CI: 1.59 - 8.11) and palbociclib (grade 1-4: RR: 1.65, 95%CI: 1.03 - 2.59), but a lower risk of grade 3-4 of both leukopenia (RR: 0.12, 95%CI: 0.02 - 0.49) and neutropenia (RR: 0.15, 95%CI: 0.04 - 0.52) compared with palbociclib. Signals indicating occurrence of leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were identified for three CDK4/6 inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib showed significant but inconsistent hematological toxicity risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"157-165"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2348566","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate and compare the risk of hematological adverse events (AEs) associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Food and Drug Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for RCTs related to abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the risks of hematological AEs, and a disproportionality analysis was performed to detect signals of hematological AEs.

Results: 16 RCTs comprising 16,350 breast cancer patients were included. Palbociclib and ribociclib had similar risks for hematological AEs, except a higher risk of grade 3-4 leukopenia observed with palbociclib (risk ratio [RR]: 7.84, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.33-41.28). Abemaciclib had a higher risk of anemia than both ribociclib (grade 1-4: RR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.25 - 3.96; grade 3-4: RR: 3.52, 95% CI: 1.59 - 8.11) and palbociclib (grade 1-4: RR: 1.65, 95%CI: 1.03 - 2.59), but a lower risk of grade 3-4 of both leukopenia (RR: 0.12, 95%CI: 0.02 - 0.49) and neutropenia (RR: 0.15, 95%CI: 0.04 - 0.52) compared with palbociclib. Signals indicating occurrence of leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were identified for three CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Conclusion: Abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib showed significant but inconsistent hematological toxicity risks.

细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶 4/6 抑制剂对乳腺癌患者的血液学毒性:一项网络荟萃分析和药物警戒研究。
研究目的我们旨在利用随机对照试验(RCT)和食品药品不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中的数据,评估和比较与CDK4/6抑制剂相关的血液学不良事件(AEs)风险:在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库中检索与abemaciclib、palbociclib和ribociclib相关的RCT。进行了网络荟萃分析(NMA)以比较血液学AEs的风险,并进行了比例失调分析以检测血液学AEs的信号:结果:共纳入了16项研究,包括16350名乳腺癌患者。Palbociclib和ribociclib发生血液学AEs的风险相似,但Palbociclib发生3-4级白细胞减少症的风险更高(风险比[RR]:7.84,95%置信区间[95%CI]:1.33-41.28)。Abemaciclib发生贫血的风险高于ribociclib(1-4级:RR:2.23,95% CI:1.25 - 3.96;3-4 级:RR:3.52,95%CI:1.59 - 8.11)和palbociclib(1-4级:RR:1.65,95%CI:1.03 - 2.59),但与palbociclib相比,3-4级白细胞减少症(RR:0.12,95%CI:0.02 - 0.49)和中性粒细胞减少症(RR:0.15,95%CI:0.04 - 0.52)的风险较低。三种CDK4/6抑制剂都出现了白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、贫血和血小板减少的信号:结论:Abemaciclib、palbociclib和ribociclib具有显著但不一致的血液学毒性风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信