Overall survival after mastectomy versus breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: meta-analysis.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
BJS Open Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrae040
Kiran K Rajan, Katherine Fairhurst, Beth Birkbeck, Shonnelly Novintan, Rebecca Wilson, Jelena Savović, Chris Holcombe, Shelley Potter
{"title":"Overall survival after mastectomy versus breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: meta-analysis.","authors":"Kiran K Rajan, Katherine Fairhurst, Beth Birkbeck, Shonnelly Novintan, Rebecca Wilson, Jelena Savović, Chris Holcombe, Shelley Potter","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy and mastectomy are currently offered as equivalent surgical options for early-stage breast cancer based on RCTs from the 1970s and 1980s. However, the treatment of breast cancer has evolved and recent observational studies suggest a survival advantage for breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to summarize the contemporary evidence regarding survival after breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy versus mastectomy for women with early-stage breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase that identified studies published between 1 January 2000 and 18 December 2023 comparing overall survival after breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy versus mastectomy for patients with unilateral stage 1-3 breast cancer was undertaken. The main exclusion criteria were studies evaluating neoadjuvant chemotherapy, rare breast cancer subtypes, and specific breast cancer populations. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess risk of bias, with the overall certainty of evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. Studies without critical risk of bias were included in a quantitative meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 11 750 abstracts, 108 eligible articles were identified, with one article including two studies; 29 studies were excluded from the meta-analysis due to an overall critical risk of bias, 42 studies were excluded due to overlapping study populations, and three studies were excluded due to reporting incompatible results. A total of 35 observational studies reported survival outcomes for 909 077 patients (362 390 patients undergoing mastectomy and 546 687 patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy). The pooled HR was 0.72 (95% c.i. 0.68 to 0.75, P < 0.001), demonstrating improved overall survival for patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy. The overall certainty of the evidence was very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis provides evidence suggesting a survival advantage for women undergoing breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer compared with mastectomy. Although these results should be interpreted with caution, they should be shared with patients to support informed surgical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11100524/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy and mastectomy are currently offered as equivalent surgical options for early-stage breast cancer based on RCTs from the 1970s and 1980s. However, the treatment of breast cancer has evolved and recent observational studies suggest a survival advantage for breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to summarize the contemporary evidence regarding survival after breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy versus mastectomy for women with early-stage breast cancer.

Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase that identified studies published between 1 January 2000 and 18 December 2023 comparing overall survival after breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy versus mastectomy for patients with unilateral stage 1-3 breast cancer was undertaken. The main exclusion criteria were studies evaluating neoadjuvant chemotherapy, rare breast cancer subtypes, and specific breast cancer populations. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess risk of bias, with the overall certainty of evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. Studies without critical risk of bias were included in a quantitative meta-analysis.

Results: From 11 750 abstracts, 108 eligible articles were identified, with one article including two studies; 29 studies were excluded from the meta-analysis due to an overall critical risk of bias, 42 studies were excluded due to overlapping study populations, and three studies were excluded due to reporting incompatible results. A total of 35 observational studies reported survival outcomes for 909 077 patients (362 390 patients undergoing mastectomy and 546 687 patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy). The pooled HR was 0.72 (95% c.i. 0.68 to 0.75, P < 0.001), demonstrating improved overall survival for patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy. The overall certainty of the evidence was very low.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides evidence suggesting a survival advantage for women undergoing breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer compared with mastectomy. Although these results should be interpreted with caution, they should be shared with patients to support informed surgical decision-making.

早期乳腺癌乳房切除术与保乳手术加辅助放疗后的总生存率:荟萃分析。
背景:根据 20 世纪 70 年代和 80 年代的 RCT 研究,目前保乳手术加辅助放疗和乳房切除术是治疗早期乳腺癌的同等手术方案。然而,乳腺癌的治疗方法已经发生了变化,最近的观察性研究表明,保乳手术加辅助放疗具有生存优势。我们进行了一项系统性综述和荟萃分析,总结了有关早期乳腺癌妇女接受保乳手术并辅助放疗与乳房切除术后存活率的当代证据:方法:对MEDLINE、Cochrane对照试验中央注册中心(CENTRAL)和Embase进行了系统检索,确定了2000年1月1日至2023年12月18日期间发表的研究,这些研究比较了单侧1-3期乳腺癌患者接受保乳手术和辅助放疗与乳房切除术后的总生存率。主要的排除标准是评估新辅助化疗、罕见乳腺癌亚型和特定乳腺癌人群的研究。采用ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险,并使用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)工具评估证据的总体确定性。无严重偏倚风险的研究被纳入定量荟萃分析:从 11 750 篇摘要中确定了 108 篇符合条件的文章,其中一篇文章包括两项研究;29 项研究因总体偏倚风险严重而被排除在荟萃分析之外,42 项研究因研究人群重叠而被排除,3 项研究因报告结果不一致而被排除。共有35项观察性研究报告了909 077名患者(362 390名患者接受了乳房切除术,546 687名患者接受了保乳手术和辅助放疗)的生存结果。汇总HR为0.72(95% c.i.为0.68至0.75,P<0.001),表明接受保乳手术和辅助放疗的患者总生存率有所提高。证据的总体确定性很低:这项荟萃分析提供的证据表明,与乳房切除术相比,接受保乳手术和辅助放疗治疗的早期乳腺癌患者的生存率更高。虽然应谨慎解释这些结果,但应与患者分享这些结果,以支持患者做出明智的手术决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信