Magnetic resonance imaging radiomic features stability in brain metastases: Impact of image preprocessing, image-, and feature-level harmonization

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Zahra Khodabakhshi, Hubert Gabrys, Philipp Wallimann, Matthias Guckenberger, Nicolaus Andratschke, Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
{"title":"Magnetic resonance imaging radiomic features stability in brain metastases: Impact of image preprocessing, image-, and feature-level harmonization","authors":"Zahra Khodabakhshi,&nbsp;Hubert Gabrys,&nbsp;Philipp Wallimann,&nbsp;Matthias Guckenberger,&nbsp;Nicolaus Andratschke,&nbsp;Stephanie Tanadini-Lang","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are highly sensitive to acquisition and reconstruction parameters which affect feature stability and model generalizability in radiomic research. This work aims to investigate the effect of image pre-processing and harmonization methods on the stability of brain MRI radiomic features and the prediction performance of radiomic models in patients with brain metastases (BMs).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Two T1 contrast enhanced brain MRI data-sets were used in this study. The first contained 25 BMs patients with scans at two different time points and was used for features stability analysis. The effect of gray level discretization (GLD), intensity normalization (Z-score, Nyul, WhiteStripe, and in house-developed method named N-Peaks), and ComBat harmonization on features stability was investigated and features with intraclass correlation coefficient &gt;0.8 were considered as stable. The second data-set containing 64 BMs patients was used for a classification task to investigate the informativeness of stable features and the effects of harmonization methods on radiomic model performance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Applying fixed bin number (FBN) GLD, resulted in higher number of stable features compare to fixed bin size (FBS) discretization (10 ± 5.5 % higher). `Harmonization in feature domain improved the stability for non-normalized and normalized images with Z-score and WhiteStripe methods. For the classification task, keeping the stable features resulted in good performance only for normalized images with N-Peaks along with FBS discretization.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>To develop a robust MRI based radiomic model we recommend using an intensity normalization method based on a reference tissue (e.g N-Peaks) and then using FBS discretization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 100585"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000551/pdfft?md5=97d3acbd58ad3959ee1f67cf8dcbaf29&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000551-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are highly sensitive to acquisition and reconstruction parameters which affect feature stability and model generalizability in radiomic research. This work aims to investigate the effect of image pre-processing and harmonization methods on the stability of brain MRI radiomic features and the prediction performance of radiomic models in patients with brain metastases (BMs).

Materials and methods

Two T1 contrast enhanced brain MRI data-sets were used in this study. The first contained 25 BMs patients with scans at two different time points and was used for features stability analysis. The effect of gray level discretization (GLD), intensity normalization (Z-score, Nyul, WhiteStripe, and in house-developed method named N-Peaks), and ComBat harmonization on features stability was investigated and features with intraclass correlation coefficient >0.8 were considered as stable. The second data-set containing 64 BMs patients was used for a classification task to investigate the informativeness of stable features and the effects of harmonization methods on radiomic model performance.

Results

Applying fixed bin number (FBN) GLD, resulted in higher number of stable features compare to fixed bin size (FBS) discretization (10 ± 5.5 % higher). `Harmonization in feature domain improved the stability for non-normalized and normalized images with Z-score and WhiteStripe methods. For the classification task, keeping the stable features resulted in good performance only for normalized images with N-Peaks along with FBS discretization.

Conclusions

To develop a robust MRI based radiomic model we recommend using an intensity normalization method based on a reference tissue (e.g N-Peaks) and then using FBS discretization.

Abstract Image

脑转移瘤的磁共振成像放射学特征稳定性:图像预处理、图像和特征级协调的影响
背景和目的磁共振成像(MRI)扫描对采集和重建参数高度敏感,这影响了放射学研究中特征的稳定性和模型的普适性。这项工作旨在研究图像预处理和协调方法对脑转移(BMs)患者脑磁共振成像放射学特征稳定性和放射学模型预测性能的影响。第一个数据集包含 25 名脑转移瘤患者在两个不同时间点的扫描数据,用于特征稳定性分析。研究了灰度离散化(GLD)、强度归一化(Z-score、Nyul、WhiteStripe 和内部开发的名为 N-Peaks 的方法)和 ComBat 协调对特征稳定性的影响,并将类内相关系数为 0.8 的特征视为稳定特征。第二个数据集包含 64 名 BMs 患者,用于分类任务,以研究稳定特征的信息量以及协调方法对放射原子模型性能的影响。结果与固定分区大小(FBS)离散化相比,应用固定分区大小(FBN)GLD 得到的稳定特征数量更高(10 ± 5.5 %)。特征域中的协调提高了采用 Z-score 和 WhiteStripe 方法的非归一化和归一化图像的稳定性。结论为了开发基于 MRI 的稳健放射模型,我们建议使用基于参考组织(如 N-Peaks)的强度归一化方法,然后使用 FBS 离散化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信