Gunavanthi D. Boorgula , Tawanda Gumbo , Sanjay Singh , Pamela J. McShane , Julie V. Philley , Shashikant Srivastava
{"title":"Omadacycline drug susceptibility testing for non-tuberculous mycobacteria using oxyrase to overcome challenges with drug degradation","authors":"Gunavanthi D. Boorgula , Tawanda Gumbo , Sanjay Singh , Pamela J. McShane , Julie V. Philley , Shashikant Srivastava","doi":"10.1016/j.tube.2024.102519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Drug susceptibility testing (DST) protocol of omadacycline against non-tuberculous mycobacteria has not yet been established. We developed a method to accurately determine MIC omadacycline MIC against <em>Mycobacterium abscessus</em> (Mab)<em>, Mycobacterium avium</em>-complex (MAC)<em>,</em> and <em>Mycobacterium kansasii</em> (Mkn).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>First, we identified the oxyrase concentration not affecting Mab, MAC, and Mkn growth followed by omadacycline MIC experiments with and without oxyrase using reference and clinical strains.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Oxyrase 0.5 % (v/v) stabilized omadacycline in the culture medium. The median omadacycline MIC was 1 mg/L for Mab and 8 mg/L for Mkn. For MAC, the median omadacycline MIC was 2 mg/L for <em>M</em>. <em>avium</em>, 256 mg/L for <em>M</em>. <em>intracellulare</em>, and 4 mg/L for <em>M</em>. <em>chimaera</em> (p < 0.0001). Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test revealed statistically lower MICs with oxyrase for all MAC subspecies (p < 0.0001), all Mab subspecies (p < 0.0001), and Mkn (p = 0.0002). The decrease in MICs with oxyrase was 17/18 of Mab, 14/19 of Mkn, 8/8 of <em>M. avium</em>, 4/5 <em>M. chimera</em>, but only 11/18 of <em>M. intracellulare</em> (p < 0.013).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Use of 0.5 % oxyrase could be a potential solution to reliable and reproducible omadacycline MIC of Mab. However, oxyrase demonstrated a variable effect in reducing MICs against MAC and Mkn.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23383,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 102519"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberculosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472979224000453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Drug susceptibility testing (DST) protocol of omadacycline against non-tuberculous mycobacteria has not yet been established. We developed a method to accurately determine MIC omadacycline MIC against Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab), Mycobacterium avium-complex (MAC), and Mycobacterium kansasii (Mkn).
Methods
First, we identified the oxyrase concentration not affecting Mab, MAC, and Mkn growth followed by omadacycline MIC experiments with and without oxyrase using reference and clinical strains.
Results
Oxyrase 0.5 % (v/v) stabilized omadacycline in the culture medium. The median omadacycline MIC was 1 mg/L for Mab and 8 mg/L for Mkn. For MAC, the median omadacycline MIC was 2 mg/L for M. avium, 256 mg/L for M. intracellulare, and 4 mg/L for M. chimaera (p < 0.0001). Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test revealed statistically lower MICs with oxyrase for all MAC subspecies (p < 0.0001), all Mab subspecies (p < 0.0001), and Mkn (p = 0.0002). The decrease in MICs with oxyrase was 17/18 of Mab, 14/19 of Mkn, 8/8 of M. avium, 4/5 M. chimera, but only 11/18 of M. intracellulare (p < 0.013).
Conclusion
Use of 0.5 % oxyrase could be a potential solution to reliable and reproducible omadacycline MIC of Mab. However, oxyrase demonstrated a variable effect in reducing MICs against MAC and Mkn.
期刊介绍:
Tuberculosis is a speciality journal focusing on basic experimental research on tuberculosis, notably on bacteriological, immunological and pathogenesis aspects of the disease. The journal publishes original research and reviews on the host response and immunology of tuberculosis and the molecular biology, genetics and physiology of the organism, however discourages submissions with a meta-analytical focus (for example, articles based on searches of published articles in public electronic databases, especially where there is lack of evidence of the personal involvement of authors in the generation of such material). We do not publish Clinical Case-Studies.
Areas on which submissions are welcomed include:
-Clinical TrialsDiagnostics-
Antimicrobial resistance-
Immunology-
Leprosy-
Microbiology, including microbial physiology-
Molecular epidemiology-
Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria-
Pathogenesis-
Pathology-
Vaccine development.
This Journal does not accept case-reports.
The resurgence of interest in tuberculosis has accelerated the pace of relevant research and Tuberculosis has grown with it, as the only journal dedicated to experimental biomedical research in tuberculosis.