Enhanced Safety and Efficiency of Ambulatory Cardiology Admissions: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2024-05-09 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000726
Mary C McLellan, Mariam Irshad, Katherine C Penny, Michelle Rufo, Sarah Atwood, Heather Dacey, Christina M Ireland, Sarah de Ferranti, Theresa Saia, Anna C Fisk, Susan F Saleeb
{"title":"Enhanced Safety and Efficiency of Ambulatory Cardiology Admissions: A Quality Improvement Initiative.","authors":"Mary C McLellan, Mariam Irshad, Katherine C Penny, Michelle Rufo, Sarah Atwood, Heather Dacey, Christina M Ireland, Sarah de Ferranti, Theresa Saia, Anna C Fisk, Susan F Saleeb","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric cardiac patients have experienced evolving illnesses progressing to instability while awaiting inpatient admission from ambulatory settings. Admission delays and communication breakdowns increase the risk for tenuous patients. This quality improvement initiative aimed to improve safety and efficiency for patients admitted from an ambulatory Clinic to the Acute Cardiac Care Unit (ACCU) using standardized communication and admission processes within one year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An admission process map, in-clinic nurse monitoring, and communication pathways were developed and implemented. A standardized team handoff occurred via virtual huddle using illness severity, patient summary, action list, situational awareness, and synthesis. Escalation of care events and timeliness were compared pre- and postimplementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a reduction of transfers to the intensive care unit within 24 hours of ACCU admission from 9.2% to 3.8% (<i>P</i> = 0.26), intensive care unit evaluations (without transfer) from 5.6% to 0% (<i>P</i> = 0.06), and arrests from 3.7% to 0% (<i>P</i> = 0.16). After the pilot, clinic nurses monitored 100% of at-risk patients. Overall mean time from admission decision to virtual huddle decreased from 81 to 61 minutes and mean time to admission from 144 to 115 minutes, with 41% (n = 33) arriving ≤ 60 minutes (goal). The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected admission timeliness while safety metrics remained optimized.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing a standardized admission process between the Clinic and ACCU enhanced safety by reducing admission wait time and escalation of care post-admission. Sustainable, reliable handoff processes, in-clinic monitoring, and standardized admission processes were established. The pandemic hindered admission efficiency without compromising safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11093579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric cardiac patients have experienced evolving illnesses progressing to instability while awaiting inpatient admission from ambulatory settings. Admission delays and communication breakdowns increase the risk for tenuous patients. This quality improvement initiative aimed to improve safety and efficiency for patients admitted from an ambulatory Clinic to the Acute Cardiac Care Unit (ACCU) using standardized communication and admission processes within one year.

Methods: An admission process map, in-clinic nurse monitoring, and communication pathways were developed and implemented. A standardized team handoff occurred via virtual huddle using illness severity, patient summary, action list, situational awareness, and synthesis. Escalation of care events and timeliness were compared pre- and postimplementation.

Results: There was a reduction of transfers to the intensive care unit within 24 hours of ACCU admission from 9.2% to 3.8% (P = 0.26), intensive care unit evaluations (without transfer) from 5.6% to 0% (P = 0.06), and arrests from 3.7% to 0% (P = 0.16). After the pilot, clinic nurses monitored 100% of at-risk patients. Overall mean time from admission decision to virtual huddle decreased from 81 to 61 minutes and mean time to admission from 144 to 115 minutes, with 41% (n = 33) arriving ≤ 60 minutes (goal). The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected admission timeliness while safety metrics remained optimized.

Conclusions: Implementing a standardized admission process between the Clinic and ACCU enhanced safety by reducing admission wait time and escalation of care post-admission. Sustainable, reliable handoff processes, in-clinic monitoring, and standardized admission processes were established. The pandemic hindered admission efficiency without compromising safety.

提高非住院心脏病学入院治疗的安全性和效率:质量改进计划。
背景:小儿心脏病患者在等待从非住院环境转入住院治疗期间,病情不断发展,最终导致病情不稳定。入院延误和沟通障碍增加了病情不稳定患者的风险。这项质量改进计划旨在利用标准化的沟通和入院流程,在一年内提高从非住院诊所入院到急性心脏病监护病房(ACCU)的患者的安全和效率:方法: 制定并实施了入院流程图、门诊护士监控和沟通路径。通过虚拟会议进行标准化团队交接,使用疾病严重程度、患者摘要、行动清单、态势感知和综合。对实施前后的护理升级事件和及时性进行了比较:结果:ACCU 入院后 24 小时内转入重症监护室的患者从 9.2% 减少到 3.8%(P = 0.26),重症监护室评估(未转院)从 5.6% 减少到 0%(P = 0.06),心跳骤停从 3.7% 减少到 0%(P = 0.16)。试点结束后,诊所护士对 100% 的高危患者进行了监测。从决定入院到虚拟会诊的平均时间从 81 分钟缩短到 61 分钟,平均入院时间从 144 分钟缩短到 115 分钟,其中 41% 的患者(33 人)在 60 分钟内到达医院(目标)。COVID-19大流行对入院及时性产生了负面影响,而安全指标却保持在最佳状态:结论:在门诊部和急诊监护室之间实施标准化入院流程可减少入院等待时间和入院后的护理升级,从而提高安全性。建立了可持续、可靠的交接流程、诊室内监控和标准化入院流程。大流行阻碍了入院效率,但并未影响安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信