Vision impairment and food insecurity in the national health and aging trends study.

Frontiers in epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fepid.2024.1353083
Moon J Lee, Louay Almidani, Laura Samuel, Bonnielin K Swenor, Joshua R Ehrlich, Varshini Varadaraj
{"title":"Vision impairment and food insecurity in the national health and aging trends study.","authors":"Moon J Lee, Louay Almidani, Laura Samuel, Bonnielin K Swenor, Joshua R Ehrlich, Varshini Varadaraj","doi":"10.3389/fepid.2024.1353083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vision impairment (VI) may further exacerbate older adults' vulnerability to experiencing food insecurity and may be a unique and important target for policies addressing access to nutritional food. The purpose of this study is to determine the association of VI in older adults with food insecurity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional analysis of round 11 (2021) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a nationally representative survey of U.S. Medicare beneficiaries ages 65 and older. Participants include 2,815 older adults with complete data on at least one objective measure of vision (distance, near or contrast sensitivity) and food insecurity. Food insecurity was assessed using a previously developed indicator of food insecurity in NHATS. VI was defined as binocular visual acuity (VA) worse than 0.3 logMAR (Snellen equivalent 20/40) at distance or its near equivalent, or contrast sensitivity (CS) worse than 1.55 logUnits. Continuous VI measures included distance and near VA (per 0.1 logMAR), and CS (per 0.1 logCS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were majority White (82%) and female (55%), and 3% had food insecurity. Older adults with any VI had a greater prevalence of food insecurity than adults without VI (5.0% vs. 2.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). In fully adjusted regression analyses, individuals with any VI experienced double the odds of food insecurity than individuals without VI (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.2-3.6). Distance VI (measured continuously) was associated with 1.2 times the odds of food insecurity (OR = 1.2; 95% CI: 1.0-1.3, per 0.1 logMAR). All other vision measures trended towards higher odds of food insecurity, though not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Older adults with VI experience higher rates of food insecurity than their peers. Interventions to improve food security should be targeted towards addressing the specific barriers faced by visually impaired older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":73083,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11094228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fepid.2024.1353083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Vision impairment (VI) may further exacerbate older adults' vulnerability to experiencing food insecurity and may be a unique and important target for policies addressing access to nutritional food. The purpose of this study is to determine the association of VI in older adults with food insecurity.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional analysis of round 11 (2021) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a nationally representative survey of U.S. Medicare beneficiaries ages 65 and older. Participants include 2,815 older adults with complete data on at least one objective measure of vision (distance, near or contrast sensitivity) and food insecurity. Food insecurity was assessed using a previously developed indicator of food insecurity in NHATS. VI was defined as binocular visual acuity (VA) worse than 0.3 logMAR (Snellen equivalent 20/40) at distance or its near equivalent, or contrast sensitivity (CS) worse than 1.55 logUnits. Continuous VI measures included distance and near VA (per 0.1 logMAR), and CS (per 0.1 logCS).

Results: Participants were majority White (82%) and female (55%), and 3% had food insecurity. Older adults with any VI had a greater prevalence of food insecurity than adults without VI (5.0% vs. 2.0%, p < 0.05). In fully adjusted regression analyses, individuals with any VI experienced double the odds of food insecurity than individuals without VI (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.2-3.6). Distance VI (measured continuously) was associated with 1.2 times the odds of food insecurity (OR = 1.2; 95% CI: 1.0-1.3, per 0.1 logMAR). All other vision measures trended towards higher odds of food insecurity, though not statistically significant.

Discussion: Older adults with VI experience higher rates of food insecurity than their peers. Interventions to improve food security should be targeted towards addressing the specific barriers faced by visually impaired older adults.

全国健康和老龄化趋势研究中的视力障碍和粮食不安全问题。
导言:视力障碍(VI)可能会进一步加剧老年人面临粮食不安全的脆弱性,并可能成为解决营养食品获取政策的一个独特而重要的目标。本研究旨在确定老年人视力障碍与粮食不安全之间的关系:这是对 "全国健康与老龄化趋势研究"(NHATS)第 11 轮(2021 年)的横断面分析,该研究是对 65 岁及以上的美国医疗保险受益人进行的一项具有全国代表性的调查。参与者包括 2815 名老年人,他们至少有一项客观视力测量(远、近或对比敏感度)和食物不安全的完整数据。食物不安全状况是使用之前在 NHATS 中开发的食物不安全指标进行评估的。视力障碍的定义是双眼远距离视力(VA)差于 0.3 logMAR(斯奈伦视力表等效值 20/40)或近距离视力差于 0.3 logMAR(斯奈伦视力表等效值 20/40),或对比敏感度(CS)差于 1.55 logUnits。连续 VI 测量包括远距离和近距离 VA(每 0.1 logMAR)和 CS(每 0.1 logCS):结果:参与者大多为白人(82%)和女性(55%),3%的人有粮食不安全问题。有任何视力障碍的老年人比没有视力障碍的老年人更容易陷入粮食不安全境地(5.0% 对 2.0%,P 讨论):与同龄人相比,患有视障的老年人的食物无保障率更高。改善食品安全的干预措施应针对视障老年人面临的特殊障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信