Impact on Quality during In-Use Preparation of an Antibody Drug Conjugate with Eight Different Closed System Transfer Device Brands.

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Léa Sorret, Wei Han Tan, Senta Voss, Patrick Favrod, Pascal Chalus, Matthias Winzer
{"title":"Impact on Quality during In-Use Preparation of an Antibody Drug Conjugate with Eight Different Closed System Transfer Device Brands.","authors":"Léa Sorret, Wei Han Tan, Senta Voss, Patrick Favrod, Pascal Chalus, Matthias Winzer","doi":"10.1208/s12248-024-00931-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the in-use compatibility of eight commercially available closed system transfer device brands (CSTDs) with a formulated model antibody drug conjugate (ADC). Overall, in-use simulated dosing preparation applying the CSTD systems investigated raised concerns for several product quality attributes. The incompatibilities observed were mainly associated with increased visible and subvisible particles formation as well as significant changes in holdup volumes. Visible and subvisible particles contained heterogeneous mixtures of particle classes, with the majority of subvisible particles associated with silicone oil leaching from CSTD systems during simulated dose preparation upon contact with the ADC formulation. These observations demonstrate that CSTD use may adversely impact product quality and delivered dose which could potentially lead to safety and efficacy concerns during administration. Other product quality attributes measured including turbidity, color, ADC recovery, and purity by size exclusion HPLC, did not show relevant changes. It is therefore strongly recommended to test and screen the compatibility of CSTDs with the respective ADC, in a representative in-use simulated administration setting, during early CMC development, i.e., well before the start of clinical studies, to include information about compatibility and to ensure that the CSTD listed in the manuals of preparation for clinical handling has been thoroughly assessed before human use.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":"26 3","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-024-00931-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the in-use compatibility of eight commercially available closed system transfer device brands (CSTDs) with a formulated model antibody drug conjugate (ADC). Overall, in-use simulated dosing preparation applying the CSTD systems investigated raised concerns for several product quality attributes. The incompatibilities observed were mainly associated with increased visible and subvisible particles formation as well as significant changes in holdup volumes. Visible and subvisible particles contained heterogeneous mixtures of particle classes, with the majority of subvisible particles associated with silicone oil leaching from CSTD systems during simulated dose preparation upon contact with the ADC formulation. These observations demonstrate that CSTD use may adversely impact product quality and delivered dose which could potentially lead to safety and efficacy concerns during administration. Other product quality attributes measured including turbidity, color, ADC recovery, and purity by size exclusion HPLC, did not show relevant changes. It is therefore strongly recommended to test and screen the compatibility of CSTDs with the respective ADC, in a representative in-use simulated administration setting, during early CMC development, i.e., well before the start of clinical studies, to include information about compatibility and to ensure that the CSTD listed in the manuals of preparation for clinical handling has been thoroughly assessed before human use.

Abstract Image

使用八种不同品牌的封闭系统转移装置在使用中制备抗体药物共轭物时对质量的影响。
本研究旨在调查八种市售封闭系统转移装置品牌(CSTD)与配制的抗体药物共轭物(ADC)模型在使用中的兼容性。总体而言,应用所调查的 CSTD 系统进行的使用中模拟给药制备引起了对若干产品质量属性的关注。观察到的不兼容性主要与可见和亚可见颗粒的形成增加以及滞留体积的显著变化有关。可见和亚可见微粒包含不同种类的微粒混合物,大部分亚可见微粒与模拟剂量制备过程中 CSTD 系统与 ADC 配方接触时硅油沥出有关。这些观察结果表明,使用 CSTD 可能会对产品质量和给药剂量产生不利影响,从而可能导致给药过程中的安全性和有效性问题。通过尺寸排除 HPLC 测量的其他产品质量属性,包括浑浊度、颜色、ADC 回收率和纯度,均未显示相关变化。因此,强烈建议在早期 CMC 开发过程中,即在临床研究开始之前,在有代表性的使用中模拟给药环境中测试和筛选 CSTD 与相应 ADC 的兼容性,以纳入有关兼容性的信息,并确保在人体使用前对临床处理准备手册中列出的 CSTD 进行彻底评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AAPS Journal
AAPS Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including: · Drug Design and Discovery · Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery · Metabolism and Transport · Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics · Translational Research · Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes · Regulatory Science We invite submissions under the following article types: · Original Research Articles · Reviews and Mini-reviews · White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials · Meeting Reports · Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications · Regulatory Notes · Tutorials · Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信