Traditional Medicare supplemental insurance and the rise of Medicare Advantage.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jeffrey Marr, Daniel Polsky
{"title":"Traditional Medicare supplemental insurance and the rise of Medicare Advantage.","authors":"Jeffrey Marr, Daniel Polsky","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Most Medicare beneficiaries obtain supplemental insurance or enroll in Medicare Advantage (MA) to protect against potentially high cost sharing in traditional Medicare (TM). We examined changes in Medicare supplemental insurance coverage in the context of MA growth.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Repeated cross-sectional analysis of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey from 2005 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We determined whether Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older were enrolled in MA (without Medicaid), TM without supplemental coverage, TM with employer-sponsored supplemental coverage, TM with Medigap, or Medicaid (in TM or MA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2005 to 2019, beneficiaries with TM and supplemental insurance provided by their former (or current) employer declined by approximately half (31.8% to 15.5%) while the share in MA (without Medicaid) more than doubled (13.4% to 35.1%). The decline in supplemental employer-sponsored insurance use was greater for White and for higher-income beneficiaries. Over the same period, beneficiaries in TM without supplemental coverage declined by more than a quarter (13.9% to 10.1%). This decline was largest for Black, Hispanic, and lower-income beneficiaries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rapid rise in MA enrollment from 2005 to 2019 was accompanied by substantial changes in supplemental insurance with TM. Our results emphasize the interconnectedness of different insurance choices made by Medicare beneficiaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Most Medicare beneficiaries obtain supplemental insurance or enroll in Medicare Advantage (MA) to protect against potentially high cost sharing in traditional Medicare (TM). We examined changes in Medicare supplemental insurance coverage in the context of MA growth.

Study design: Repeated cross-sectional analysis of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey from 2005 to 2019.

Methods: We determined whether Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older were enrolled in MA (without Medicaid), TM without supplemental coverage, TM with employer-sponsored supplemental coverage, TM with Medigap, or Medicaid (in TM or MA).

Results: From 2005 to 2019, beneficiaries with TM and supplemental insurance provided by their former (or current) employer declined by approximately half (31.8% to 15.5%) while the share in MA (without Medicaid) more than doubled (13.4% to 35.1%). The decline in supplemental employer-sponsored insurance use was greater for White and for higher-income beneficiaries. Over the same period, beneficiaries in TM without supplemental coverage declined by more than a quarter (13.9% to 10.1%). This decline was largest for Black, Hispanic, and lower-income beneficiaries.

Conclusions: The rapid rise in MA enrollment from 2005 to 2019 was accompanied by substantial changes in supplemental insurance with TM. Our results emphasize the interconnectedness of different insurance choices made by Medicare beneficiaries.

传统的医疗保险补充保险和医疗保险优势的兴起。
目标:大多数医疗保险受益人都会购买补充保险或加入医疗保险优势计划(MA),以抵御传统医疗保险(TM)中潜在的高额费用分担。我们研究了医疗保险补充保险在医疗保险增长背景下的变化:对 2005 年至 2019 年的医疗保险当前受益人调查进行重复横截面分析:我们确定 65 岁及以上的联邦医疗保险受益人是否参加了 MA(无医疗补助)、无补充保险的 TM、有雇主赞助的补充保险的 TM、有 Medigap 的 TM 或医疗补助(TM 或 MA):从 2005 年到 2019 年,由前(或现)雇主提供 TM 和补充保险的受益人减少了约一半(从 31.8% 减少到 15.5%),而参加 MA(无 Medicaid)的受益人增加了一倍多(从 13.4% 增加到 35.1%)。白人和高收入受益人使用雇主赞助的补充保险的下降幅度更大。同期,没有补充保险的 TM 受益人减少了四分之一以上(从 13.9%降至 10.1%)。黑人、西班牙裔和低收入受益人的下降幅度最大:从 2005 年到 2019 年,医疗保险参保人数迅速增加,与此同时,TM 补充保险也发生了巨大变化。我们的研究结果强调了医疗保险受益人所做的不同保险选择之间的相互关联性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信