Emergency department risk model: timely identification of patients for outpatient care coordination.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Maryam Zolnoori, Mark D Williams, Kurt B Angstman, Chung-Il Wi, William B Leasure, Shrinath Patel, Che Ngufor
{"title":"Emergency department risk model: timely identification of patients for outpatient care coordination.","authors":"Maryam Zolnoori, Mark D Williams, Kurt B Angstman, Chung-Il Wi, William B Leasure, Shrinath Patel, Che Ngufor","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is linked to a 61% increased risk of emergency department (ED) visits and frequent ED usage. Collaborative care management (CoCM) models target MDD treatment in primary care, but how best to prioritize patients for CoCM to prevent frequent ED utilization remains unclear. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk identification model to proactively detect patients with MDD in CoCM at high risk of frequent (≥ 3) ED visits.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This retrospective cohort study utilized electronic health records from Mayo Clinic's primary care system to develop and validate a machine learning-based risk identification model. The model predicts the likelihood of frequent ED visits among patients with MDD within a 12-month period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from Mayo Clinic's primary care system between May 1, 2006, and December 19, 2018. Risk identification models were developed and validated using machine learning classifiers to estimate frequent ED visit risks over 12 months. The Shapley Additive Explanations model identified variables driving frequent ED visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient population had a mean (SD) age of 39.78 (16.66) years, with 30.3% being male and 6.1% experiencing frequent ED visits. The best-performing algorithm (elastic-net logistic regression) achieved an area under the curve of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.74-0.84), a sensitivity of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.57-0.82), and a specificity of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.64-0.85) in the development data set. In the validation data set, the best-performing algorithm (random forest) achieved an area under the curve of 0.79, a sensitivity of 0.83, and a specificity of 0.61. Significant variables included male gender, prior frequent ED visits, high Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score, low education level, unemployment, and use of multiple medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk identification model has potential for clinical application in triaging primary care patients with MDD in CoCM, aiming to reduce future ED utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89542","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is linked to a 61% increased risk of emergency department (ED) visits and frequent ED usage. Collaborative care management (CoCM) models target MDD treatment in primary care, but how best to prioritize patients for CoCM to prevent frequent ED utilization remains unclear. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk identification model to proactively detect patients with MDD in CoCM at high risk of frequent (≥ 3) ED visits.

Study design: This retrospective cohort study utilized electronic health records from Mayo Clinic's primary care system to develop and validate a machine learning-based risk identification model. The model predicts the likelihood of frequent ED visits among patients with MDD within a 12-month period.

Methods: Data were collected from Mayo Clinic's primary care system between May 1, 2006, and December 19, 2018. Risk identification models were developed and validated using machine learning classifiers to estimate frequent ED visit risks over 12 months. The Shapley Additive Explanations model identified variables driving frequent ED visits.

Results: The patient population had a mean (SD) age of 39.78 (16.66) years, with 30.3% being male and 6.1% experiencing frequent ED visits. The best-performing algorithm (elastic-net logistic regression) achieved an area under the curve of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.74-0.84), a sensitivity of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.57-0.82), and a specificity of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.64-0.85) in the development data set. In the validation data set, the best-performing algorithm (random forest) achieved an area under the curve of 0.79, a sensitivity of 0.83, and a specificity of 0.61. Significant variables included male gender, prior frequent ED visits, high Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score, low education level, unemployment, and use of multiple medications.

Conclusions: The risk identification model has potential for clinical application in triaging primary care patients with MDD in CoCM, aiming to reduce future ED utilization.

急诊科风险模型:及时发现病人,进行门诊护理协调。
目的:重度抑郁症(MDD)与急诊科(ED)就诊风险增加 61% 和频繁使用急诊科有关。协同护理管理(CoCM)模式以初级保健中的重度抑郁症治疗为目标,但如何最好地将患者优先纳入协同护理管理以防止频繁使用急诊室仍不清楚。本研究旨在开发并验证一种风险识别模型,以主动检测出CoCM中频繁(≥3次)使用急诊室的高风险MDD患者:这项回顾性队列研究利用梅奥诊所初级保健系统的电子健康记录,开发并验证了基于机器学习的风险识别模型。该模型可预测 MDD 患者在 12 个月内频繁去急诊室就诊的可能性:2006年5月1日至2018年12月19日期间的数据来自梅奥诊所的初级保健系统。使用机器学习分类器开发并验证了风险识别模型,以估算12个月内ED频繁就诊的风险。Shapley Additive Explanations模型确定了导致ED频繁就诊的变量:患者的平均(标清)年龄为 39.78(16.66)岁,30.3% 为男性,6.1% 的患者经常去急诊室就诊。在开发数据集中,表现最好的算法(弹性网逻辑回归)的曲线下面积为 0.79(95% CI,0.74-0.84),灵敏度为 0.71(95% CI,0.57-0.82),特异性为 0.76(95% CI,0.64-0.85)。在验证数据集中,表现最好的算法(随机森林)的曲线下面积为 0.79,灵敏度为 0.83,特异度为 0.61。重要的变量包括男性、曾频繁去急诊室就诊、患者健康问卷-9 得分高、受教育程度低、失业和使用多种药物:该风险识别模型具有临床应用潜力,可用于在CoCM中对患有MDD的初级保健患者进行分流,从而减少未来的急诊室使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信