Disparities in Mammography Screening: Analyzing Barriers to Access Using Individual Patient Perspectives and the Health Belief Model.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Eline M van den Broek-Altenburg, Abimbola A Leslie, Jamie S Benson, Kristen K DeStigter
{"title":"Disparities in Mammography Screening: Analyzing Barriers to Access Using Individual Patient Perspectives and the Health Belief Model.","authors":"Eline M van den Broek-Altenburg, Abimbola A Leslie, Jamie S Benson, Kristen K DeStigter","doi":"10.1177/10732748241248367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of our study is to explore Nepali women's beliefs about access to mammography screening, and motivations to get screened or not. This work was intended to be hypothesis generating for subsequent quantitative analysis and to inform policy and decision-making to improve access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted structured qualitative interviews among nine Nepali women in the Northeast of the United States receiving care at a local community health center and among nine white women receiving mammography care at a large academic medical center in the Northeast. We analyzed the transcripts using a mixed deductive (content analysis) and inductive (grounded theory) approach. Deductive codes were generated from the Health Belief Model which states that a person's belief in the real threat of a disease with their belief in the effectiveness of the recommended health service or behavior or action will predict the likelihood the person will adopt the behavior. We compared and contrasted qualitative results from both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that eligible Nepali women who had not received mammography screening had no knowledge of its availability and its importance. Primary care physicians emerged as a critical link in addressing this disparity: trust was found to be high among Nepali women with their established primary care provider.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study suggest that the role of primary care practitioners in conversations around the importance and eligibility for mammography screening is of critical importance, especially for underserved groups with limited health knowledge of screening opportunities and potential health benefits. Follow-up research should focus on primary care practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"31 ","pages":"10732748241248367"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11100395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241248367","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of our study is to explore Nepali women's beliefs about access to mammography screening, and motivations to get screened or not. This work was intended to be hypothesis generating for subsequent quantitative analysis and to inform policy and decision-making to improve access.

Methods: We conducted structured qualitative interviews among nine Nepali women in the Northeast of the United States receiving care at a local community health center and among nine white women receiving mammography care at a large academic medical center in the Northeast. We analyzed the transcripts using a mixed deductive (content analysis) and inductive (grounded theory) approach. Deductive codes were generated from the Health Belief Model which states that a person's belief in the real threat of a disease with their belief in the effectiveness of the recommended health service or behavior or action will predict the likelihood the person will adopt the behavior. We compared and contrasted qualitative results from both groups.

Results: We found that eligible Nepali women who had not received mammography screening had no knowledge of its availability and its importance. Primary care physicians emerged as a critical link in addressing this disparity: trust was found to be high among Nepali women with their established primary care provider.

Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that the role of primary care practitioners in conversations around the importance and eligibility for mammography screening is of critical importance, especially for underserved groups with limited health knowledge of screening opportunities and potential health benefits. Follow-up research should focus on primary care practices.

乳腺放射摄影筛查中的差异:利用患者个人观点和健康信念模型分析获得检查的障碍。
研究目的我们的研究旨在探讨尼泊尔妇女对乳房 X 射线照相筛查的看法,以及是否接受筛查的动机。这项工作旨在为后续的定量分析提出假设,并为改善筛查机会的政策和决策提供信息:我们对在美国东北部一家社区医疗中心接受治疗的九名尼泊尔妇女和在东北部一家大型学术医疗中心接受乳腺 X 射线照相术治疗的九名白人妇女进行了结构化定性访谈。我们采用混合演绎法(内容分析法)和归纳法(基础理论)对访谈记录进行了分析。演绎代码来自健康信念模型,该模型指出,一个人对疾病真实威胁的信念以及对推荐的健康服务或行为或行动有效性的信念将预测该人采取该行为的可能性。我们对两组的定性结果进行了比较和对比:结果:我们发现,没有接受过乳房 X 射线照相筛查的合格尼泊尔妇女不了解乳房 X 射线照相筛查的可用性及其重要性。初级保健医生是解决这一差异的关键环节:我们发现尼泊尔妇女对其固定的初级保健提供者非常信任:这项研究的结果表明,初级保健医生在围绕乳腺 X 射线照相筛查的重要性和资格的对话中扮演着至关重要的角色,尤其是对于对筛查机会和潜在健康益处的健康知识有限的服务不足群体而言。后续研究应侧重于初级保健实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Control
Cancer Control ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Control is a JCR-ranked, peer-reviewed open access journal whose mission is to advance the prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care of cancer by enabling researchers, doctors, policymakers, and other healthcare professionals to freely share research along the cancer control continuum. Our vision is a world where gold-standard cancer care is the norm, not the exception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信