Intercontinental Comparison of Immunohistochemical Subtypes Among Individuals With Breast Cancer in South-East Asia and South America: A Scoping Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

IF 2.1 Q3 ONCOLOGY
World Journal of Oncology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI:10.14740/wjon1788
Dedy Hermansyah, Naufal Nandita Firsty, Ruth Hasian Nami Siagian, Najwa Nandita Dwinda
{"title":"Intercontinental Comparison of Immunohistochemical Subtypes Among Individuals With Breast Cancer in South-East Asia and South America: A Scoping Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.","authors":"Dedy Hermansyah, Naufal Nandita Firsty, Ruth Hasian Nami Siagian, Najwa Nandita Dwinda","doi":"10.14740/wjon1788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer (BC) remains a significant global concern, particularly among developing countries in South-East Asia (SEA) and South America (SA). The socioeconomic burdens of oncologic care in those countries were often originated from limited accessibility on attainable therapeutic options and reliability on identifying essential information of cancer cells, i.e., immunohistochemical (IHC) subtyping to determine suitable approaches. The triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is among the most aggressive category in breast malignancy, therefore, requiring more specific molecular pathway blocking to exhaust the cells. However, large-scale epidemiological investigation on its rate among BC remains unavailable to date. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of TNBC in the SEA and SA continents since it may guide the future direction of oncologic research and trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review focuses on observational studies from the SEA and SA continents from the last decade. Each study represents its country or cities, period of observation, population size, and the TNBC-BC rate as the main outcomes. Therefore, we may also limit the reporting bias originated from same-patient data on the specific occasions. The analysis will be derived to SEA-SA comparison, plus SEA/SA-specific session as processed in Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) version 3.0. The statistical analysis will be performed in random effects model (REM) within 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 46 studies included in the final analysis with a total enlisted population of 34,346 unique individuals with BC, the TNBC rate was higher in the SEA compared to the SA region (19.3% vs. 15.7%; P < 0.05 in 95% CI), with the highest prevalence observed in Vietnam (22.4%) and Peru (17.8%), if it was restricted on countries with two or more studies. Interestingly, both Laos and Argentina possessed significant differences compared to other countries within their respective continents, with the highest and lowest TNBC rates (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IHC characteristics in SEA differ from those in the SA continent as mainly represented by TNBC prevalence, possibly shaping the course of future trials in the respective region based on IHC expressivity status.</p>","PeriodicalId":46797,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11092420/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon1788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer (BC) remains a significant global concern, particularly among developing countries in South-East Asia (SEA) and South America (SA). The socioeconomic burdens of oncologic care in those countries were often originated from limited accessibility on attainable therapeutic options and reliability on identifying essential information of cancer cells, i.e., immunohistochemical (IHC) subtyping to determine suitable approaches. The triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is among the most aggressive category in breast malignancy, therefore, requiring more specific molecular pathway blocking to exhaust the cells. However, large-scale epidemiological investigation on its rate among BC remains unavailable to date. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of TNBC in the SEA and SA continents since it may guide the future direction of oncologic research and trials.

Methods: This review focuses on observational studies from the SEA and SA continents from the last decade. Each study represents its country or cities, period of observation, population size, and the TNBC-BC rate as the main outcomes. Therefore, we may also limit the reporting bias originated from same-patient data on the specific occasions. The analysis will be derived to SEA-SA comparison, plus SEA/SA-specific session as processed in Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) version 3.0. The statistical analysis will be performed in random effects model (REM) within 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: From 46 studies included in the final analysis with a total enlisted population of 34,346 unique individuals with BC, the TNBC rate was higher in the SEA compared to the SA region (19.3% vs. 15.7%; P < 0.05 in 95% CI), with the highest prevalence observed in Vietnam (22.4%) and Peru (17.8%), if it was restricted on countries with two or more studies. Interestingly, both Laos and Argentina possessed significant differences compared to other countries within their respective continents, with the highest and lowest TNBC rates (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The IHC characteristics in SEA differ from those in the SA continent as mainly represented by TNBC prevalence, possibly shaping the course of future trials in the respective region based on IHC expressivity status.

东南亚和南美洲乳腺癌患者免疫组化亚型的洲际比较:观察性研究的范围界定系统回顾和元分析》。
背景:乳腺癌(BC)仍然是全球关注的一个重要问题,尤其是在东南亚(SEA)和南美洲(SA)的发展中国家。这些国家在肿瘤治疗方面的社会经济负担往往源于可获得的治疗方案和识别癌细胞基本信息的可靠性有限,即通过免疫组化(IHC)亚型来确定合适的方法。三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)是乳腺恶性肿瘤中最具侵袭性的一类,因此需要更特殊的分子通路阻断来消灭细胞。然而,关于 TNBC 在乳腺癌中的发病率的大规模流行病学调查至今仍未开展。本研究旨在描述TNBC在东南亚和南亚大陆的发病率,因为它可以指导未来的肿瘤研究和试验方向:方法:本综述侧重于过去十年间东南亚和南亚大陆的观察性研究。每项研究均以其所在国家或城市、观察期、人群规模和TNBC-BC率为主要结果。因此,我们也可以限制特定场合的同病种数据所产生的报告偏差。分析结果将通过SEA-SA比较,再加上SEA/SA特定环节,在CMA(Comprehensive Meta-Analysis)3.0版中进行处理。统计分析将在95%置信区间(CI)内以随机效应模型(REM)进行:在纳入最终分析的 46 项研究中,共有 34346 名 BC 患者,与南亚地区相比,东南亚地区的 TNBC 患病率更高(19.3% 对 15.7%;95% CI 中 P <0.05),如果仅限于有两项或更多研究的国家,则越南(22.4%)和秘鲁(17.8%)的患病率最高。有趣的是,老挝和阿根廷与各自大陆的其他国家相比存在显著差异,TNBC发病率最高和最低(P<0.05):结论:东南亚地区的IHC特征与南亚地区的IHC特征不同,主要体现在TNBC发病率上,这可能会根据IHC的表达状况影响各自地区未来试验的进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: World Journal of Oncology, bimonthly, publishes original contributions describing basic research and clinical investigation of cancer, on the cellular, molecular, prevention, diagnosis, therapy and prognosis aspects. The submissions can be basic research or clinical investigation oriented. This journal welcomes those submissions focused on the clinical trials of new treatment modalities for cancer, and those submissions focused on molecular or cellular research of the oncology pathogenesis. Case reports submitted for consideration of publication should explore either a novel genomic event/description or a new safety signal from an oncolytic agent. The areas of interested manuscripts are these disciplines: tumor immunology and immunotherapy; cancer molecular pharmacology and chemotherapy; drug sensitivity and resistance; cancer epidemiology; clinical trials; cancer pathology; radiobiology and radiation oncology; solid tumor oncology; hematological malignancies; surgical oncology; pediatric oncology; molecular oncology and cancer genes; gene therapy; cancer endocrinology; cancer metastasis; prevention and diagnosis of cancer; other cancer related subjects. The types of manuscripts accepted are original article, review, editorial, short communication, case report, letter to the editor, book review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信