Breaking barriers, building faculty: A qualitative analysis to exploring faculty development in academic hospital medicine

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jack Badawy MD, Matthew Sakumoto MD, Elizabeth Murphy MD, David Schmit MD, Christine Davis MS, Ankur Segon MD, MPH, Andrew Auerbach MD, Marisha Burden MD, MBA
{"title":"Breaking barriers, building faculty: A qualitative analysis to exploring faculty development in academic hospital medicine","authors":"Jack Badawy MD,&nbsp;Matthew Sakumoto MD,&nbsp;Elizabeth Murphy MD,&nbsp;David Schmit MD,&nbsp;Christine Davis MS,&nbsp;Ankur Segon MD, MPH,&nbsp;Andrew Auerbach MD,&nbsp;Marisha Burden MD, MBA","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Hospital medicine (HM) continues to be primarily composed of junior hospitalists and research has highlighted a paucity of mentors and academic output. Faculty advancement programs have been identified as a means to support junior hospitalists in their career trajectories and to advance the field. The optimal approach to supporting faculty development (FD) efforts is not known.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To understand hospitalist groups' approaches to FD, including efforts that were perceived to be effective, and to identify barriers as well as potential future directions for FD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Rapid qualitative methods were utilized including templated summaries and matrix analysis to identify major themes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting and Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Virtual focus groups with hospitalists in the Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome and Measures</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative themes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Nineteen individuals from 17 unique institutions from across the United States in May 2022 participated in seven focus groups. Four key themes emerged from the study and included (1) academic hospitalist programs face multifaceted challenges and barriers to FD in HM, (2) groups have embraced a diversity of structures and frameworks, (3) due to clinical volumes, FD programs have had to adapt and evolve to meet FD needs, and (4) participants identified multiple areas for improvement, including defining tangible outcomes of FD programs and creating a repository of FD material which can be shared widely.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13406","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hospital medicine (HM) continues to be primarily composed of junior hospitalists and research has highlighted a paucity of mentors and academic output. Faculty advancement programs have been identified as a means to support junior hospitalists in their career trajectories and to advance the field. The optimal approach to supporting faculty development (FD) efforts is not known.

Objective

To understand hospitalist groups' approaches to FD, including efforts that were perceived to be effective, and to identify barriers as well as potential future directions for FD.

Design

Rapid qualitative methods were utilized including templated summaries and matrix analysis to identify major themes.

Setting and Participants

Virtual focus groups with hospitalists in the Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN).

Main Outcome and Measures

Qualitative themes.

Results

Nineteen individuals from 17 unique institutions from across the United States in May 2022 participated in seven focus groups. Four key themes emerged from the study and included (1) academic hospitalist programs face multifaceted challenges and barriers to FD in HM, (2) groups have embraced a diversity of structures and frameworks, (3) due to clinical volumes, FD programs have had to adapt and evolve to meet FD needs, and (4) participants identified multiple areas for improvement, including defining tangible outcomes of FD programs and creating a repository of FD material which can be shared widely.

打破障碍,建设师资队伍:定性分析探索医院医学学术领域的师资发展。
背景:医院医学(HM)仍然主要由初级住院医师组成,研究表明导师和学术成果匮乏。教员晋升计划被认为是支持初级医院医生职业发展和推动该领域进步的一种手段。目前尚不清楚支持师资发展(FD)工作的最佳方法:目的:了解住院医师团体的师资发展方法,包括他们认为有效的工作,并确定师资发展的障碍和潜在的未来方向:设计:采用快速定性方法,包括模板摘要和矩阵分析,以确定主要主题:主要结果和测量指标:定性主题 结果:2022 年 5 月,来自全美 17 家不同机构的 19 人参加了 7 个焦点小组。研究中出现了四个关键主题,包括:(1)医院医学学术项目面临着多方面的挑战和障碍,(2)各小组采用了多种结构和框架,(3)由于临床量的增加,医院医学项目不得不进行调整和演变,以满足医院医学的需求,(4)参与者确定了多个需要改进的领域,包括确定医院医学项目的实际成果,以及创建一个可广泛共享的医院医学材料库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of hospital medicine
Journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.50%
发文量
233
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JHM is a peer-reviewed publication of the Society of Hospital Medicine and is published 12 times per year. JHM publishes manuscripts that address the care of hospitalized adults or children. Broad areas of interest include (1) Treatments for common inpatient conditions; (2) Approaches to improving perioperative care; (3) Improving care for hospitalized patients with geriatric or pediatric vulnerabilities (such as mobility problems, or those with complex longitudinal care); (4) Evaluation of innovative healthcare delivery or educational models; (5) Approaches to improving the quality, safety, and value of healthcare across the acute- and postacute-continuum of care; and (6) Evaluation of policy and payment changes that affect hospital and postacute care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信