Potential impact of European Medicines Agency measures to minimize risk of serious side effects on JAKi prescribing and utilization in the UK.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Zixing Tian, Lianne Kearsley-Fleet, James Galloway, Kath Watson, Mark Lunt, Kimme L Hyrich
{"title":"Potential impact of European Medicines Agency measures to minimize risk of serious side effects on JAKi prescribing and utilization in the UK.","authors":"Zixing Tian, Lianne Kearsley-Fleet, James Galloway, Kath Watson, Mark Lunt, Kimme L Hyrich","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keae279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) or targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) effectively treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, due to safety concerns, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) published risk-minimization measures limiting JAKi prescription to certain at-risk patients unless no suitable alternative is available. This analysis included patients who had started their first-ever JAKi (before EMA measures were published) in a large national cohort study to investigate the potential impact of these measures on JAKi prescribing and utilization in the UK.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>RA patients starting first-ever JAKi therapy in BSRBR-RA between 13 February 2017 and 31 May 2022 were included. The percentages of patients meeting the EMA risk criteria were presented. For the at-risk patients, their previous numbers of distinct biologic (b) DMARD classes prescribed were described.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 1341 patients were included, and 80% (N = 1075) met ≥1 EMA risk criterion. Of those who met ≥1 risk criterion, 529 patients (49%) had received JAKi as their first or second b/tsDMARD class, whereas 299 (28%) had received ≥3 prior bDMARD classes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Four-fifths of RA patients who had commenced a JAKi before the EMA advisory were considered 'at-risk', with prescribing only advised if there was no suitable alternative. Almost a third of those patients had already received ≥3 bDMARDs classes, and alternative therapies would be very limited for them; however, suitable alternatives might have existed for the remaining proportion, especially for those who received a JAKi as their first or second b/tsDMARD, and re-evaluation of the suitability of their treatment may be needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"1453-1458"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11879295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keae279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) or targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) effectively treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, due to safety concerns, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) published risk-minimization measures limiting JAKi prescription to certain at-risk patients unless no suitable alternative is available. This analysis included patients who had started their first-ever JAKi (before EMA measures were published) in a large national cohort study to investigate the potential impact of these measures on JAKi prescribing and utilization in the UK.

Method: RA patients starting first-ever JAKi therapy in BSRBR-RA between 13 February 2017 and 31 May 2022 were included. The percentages of patients meeting the EMA risk criteria were presented. For the at-risk patients, their previous numbers of distinct biologic (b) DMARD classes prescribed were described.

Result: A total of 1341 patients were included, and 80% (N = 1075) met ≥1 EMA risk criterion. Of those who met ≥1 risk criterion, 529 patients (49%) had received JAKi as their first or second b/tsDMARD class, whereas 299 (28%) had received ≥3 prior bDMARD classes.

Conclusion: Four-fifths of RA patients who had commenced a JAKi before the EMA advisory were considered 'at-risk', with prescribing only advised if there was no suitable alternative. Almost a third of those patients had already received ≥3 bDMARDs classes, and alternative therapies would be very limited for them; however, suitable alternatives might have existed for the remaining proportion, especially for those who received a JAKi as their first or second b/tsDMARD, and re-evaluation of the suitability of their treatment may be needed.

欧洲药品管理局降低严重副作用风险的措施对英国 JAKi 处方和使用的潜在影响。
目的:Janus 激酶抑制剂(JAKi)或靶向合成(ts)改变病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)可有效治疗类风湿性关节炎(RA)。然而,出于安全考虑,欧洲药品管理局(EMA)发布了风险最小化措施,规定除非没有合适的替代药物,否则JAKi处方仅限于某些高危患者。本分析将欧洲药品管理局措施公布前已开始首次使用JAKi的患者纳入一项大型全国性队列研究,以调查这些措施对英国JAKi处方和使用的潜在影响:方法:纳入2017年2月13日至2022年5月31日期间在BSRBR-RA首次开始JAK抑制剂治疗的RA患者。列出符合 EMA 风险标准的患者百分比。对于高危患者,描述了之前不同生物(b)DMARD类别的数量:结果:共纳入 1341 例患者,80%(N = 1075)的患者符合≥1 项 EMA 风险标准。在符合≥1项风险标准的患者中,有529名患者(49%)接受过JAKi作为其第一或第二类b/tsDMARD,而有299名患者(28%)之前接受过≥3类bDMARD:结论:五分之四的 RA 患者在 EMA 建议发布前开始使用 JAKi,这些患者被视为 "高危 "患者,只有在没有合适替代药物的情况下才建议处方。其中近三分之一的患者已经接受了≥3种bDMARDs类药物治疗,对他们来说替代疗法非常有限;与此同时,其余部分患者可能存在合适的替代疗法,尤其是那些接受JAKi作为第一或第二种b/tsDMARD的患者,可能需要重新评估其治疗的适宜性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology
Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1091
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press. Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信