Severity Of Radiographic Osteoarthritis: Association with Improved Patient Reported Outcomes Following Knee Arthroplasty.

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Yoav S Zvi, Shoran Tamura, Jonathan Rubin, Zeynep Seref-Ferlengez, Eli Kamara
{"title":"Severity Of Radiographic Osteoarthritis: Association with Improved Patient Reported Outcomes Following Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Yoav S Zvi, Shoran Tamura, Jonathan Rubin, Zeynep Seref-Ferlengez, Eli Kamara","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) classification for knee osteoarthritis estimates disease severity. Its utility in predicting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after primary total knee arthroplasty (pTKA) has been suggested. We hypothesized that patients who had higher preoperative KL grades would demonstrate greater improvements in PROs after pTKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent pTKA between 2016 and 2021. Two observers graded preoperative radiographs (KL1/2, KL3, and KL4). Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for activities of daily living (KOOS-ADL) and pain (KOOS-Pain) were collected at preoperative and 12-month postoperative visits. Changes in KOOS-ADL (ΔADL) and changes in KOOS-Pain (ΔPain) scores were compared from the preoperative to 12-month postoperative mark across different groups, with the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for both ΔADL (MCID-ADL) and ΔPain (MCID-Pain) also being calculated. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1651 patients were included in the study. The KL3 and KL4 groups exhibited significantly higher ΔADL scores and ΔPain scores compared with the KL1/2 group (P < 0.01). Patients who had KL3 and KL4 were 1.42 (P = 0.03) and 1.88 (P < 0.01) times, respectively, more likely to achieve MCID-ADL compared with those who had KL1/2. Furthermore, patients who had a KL4 were 1.92 times (P < 0.01) more likely to reach MCID-Pain compared with those who had KL1/2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study determined that patients who had higher preoperative KL grades experienced markedly greater improvements in KOOS-ADL and KOOS-Pain scores than those who had lower KL grades. These findings offer surgeons an objective tool when counseling patients on expected outcomes after pTKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11098231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) classification for knee osteoarthritis estimates disease severity. Its utility in predicting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after primary total knee arthroplasty (pTKA) has been suggested. We hypothesized that patients who had higher preoperative KL grades would demonstrate greater improvements in PROs after pTKA.

Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent pTKA between 2016 and 2021. Two observers graded preoperative radiographs (KL1/2, KL3, and KL4). Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for activities of daily living (KOOS-ADL) and pain (KOOS-Pain) were collected at preoperative and 12-month postoperative visits. Changes in KOOS-ADL (ΔADL) and changes in KOOS-Pain (ΔPain) scores were compared from the preoperative to 12-month postoperative mark across different groups, with the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for both ΔADL (MCID-ADL) and ΔPain (MCID-Pain) also being calculated. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: A total of 1651 patients were included in the study. The KL3 and KL4 groups exhibited significantly higher ΔADL scores and ΔPain scores compared with the KL1/2 group (P < 0.01). Patients who had KL3 and KL4 were 1.42 (P = 0.03) and 1.88 (P < 0.01) times, respectively, more likely to achieve MCID-ADL compared with those who had KL1/2. Furthermore, patients who had a KL4 were 1.92 times (P < 0.01) more likely to reach MCID-Pain compared with those who had KL1/2.

Conclusions: This study determined that patients who had higher preoperative KL grades experienced markedly greater improvements in KOOS-ADL and KOOS-Pain scores than those who had lower KL grades. These findings offer surgeons an objective tool when counseling patients on expected outcomes after pTKA.

放射骨关节炎的严重程度:与改善膝关节置换术后患者报告结果的关系
导言:凯尔格伦和劳伦斯(Kellgren and Lawrence,KL)膝关节骨性关节炎分类估计了疾病的严重程度。有人认为该分级可用于预测初级全膝关节置换术(pTKA)后的患者报告结果(PROs)。我们假设,术前KL分级较高的患者在PTKA术后的PROs会有更大的改善:这是一项对 2016 年至 2021 年期间接受 pTKA 的患者进行的回顾性研究。两名观察员对术前X光片(KL1/2、KL3和KL4)进行分级。在术前和术后 12 个月的访视中收集了日常生活活动(KOOS-ADL)和疼痛(KOOS-Pain)的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)。比较不同组别从术前到术后 12 个月的 KOOS-ADL (ΔADL) 和 KOOS-Pain (ΔPain) 评分变化,并计算 ΔADL (MCID-ADL) 和 ΔPain (MCID-Pain) 的最小临床重要性差异 (MCID)。P 值小于 0.05 即为具有统计学意义:共有 1651 名患者参与了研究。与 KL1/2 组相比,KL3 和 KL4 组的 ΔADL 评分和 ΔPain 评分明显更高(P < 0.01)。与 KL1/2 组相比,KL3 和 KL4 组患者达到 MCID-ADL 的可能性分别高出 1.42 倍(P = 0.03)和 1.88 倍(P < 0.01)。此外,与患有 KL1/2 的患者相比,患有 KL4 的患者达到 MCID-Pain 的可能性要高出 1.92 倍(P < 0.01):本研究发现,与 KL 等级较低的患者相比,术前 KL 等级较高的患者在 KOOS-ADL 和 KOOS-Pain 评分方面的改善幅度明显更大。这些发现为外科医生提供了一种客观的工具,帮助他们向患者介绍 pTKA 术后的预期效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
282
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信