Low-Income Participants' Preference Between Financial Incentives for Behavioral Goals vs Weight Loss Targets and Associations With Behavioral Goal Adherence.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
American Journal of Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1177/08901171241254366
Akshitha Adhiyaman, Melanie Jay, Un Young Rebecca Chung, Andres N Gronda, Chi-Hong Tseng, Judith Wylie-Rosett, Sandra Wittleder, Soma Wali, Joseph A Ladapo, Stephanie L Orstad
{"title":"Low-Income Participants' Preference Between Financial Incentives for Behavioral Goals vs Weight Loss Targets and Associations With Behavioral Goal Adherence.","authors":"Akshitha Adhiyaman, Melanie Jay, Un Young Rebecca Chung, Andres N Gronda, Chi-Hong Tseng, Judith Wylie-Rosett, Sandra Wittleder, Soma Wali, Joseph A Ladapo, Stephanie L Orstad","doi":"10.1177/08901171241254366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Examine associations between whether participants' were matched to their preferred financial incentive design and behavioral goal adherence in a weight management intervention.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary quantitative analysis incorporating qualitative survey data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Primary care clinics in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities in New York City and Los Angeles.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>668 participants (mean age 47.7 years, 81.0% female, 72.6% Hispanic) with obesity were enrolled in the Financial Incentives foR Weight Reduction (FIReWoRk) intervention.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>We explored qualitatively participant's reasons for hypothetically choosing a behavioral goal-directed vs a weight loss outcome-based financial incentive program. Additionally, behavioral adherence to different goals was collected at the 6-month timepoint, categorized by match to preferred financial incentive design.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Logistic regression was used to examine if participants with certain demographic and higher psychosocial factors were more likely to choose goal-directed over outcome-based incentives. Additionally, logistic regression was used to test for associations between preference and behavioral adherence, using incentive type as an interaction term.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>60.2% of participants preferred the goal-directed incentive, with the majority stating that it was more structured. Married participants were more likely to prefer goal-directed incentives (OR = 1.57, CI = 1.06-2.33, <i>P</i> = .025). Moderation analysis revealed that participants who preferred goal-directed and were matched to goal-directed had greater rates of behavioral adherence for program attendance and self-weighing, but not dietary tracking and physical activity tracking, compared to those who preferred outcome-based and were matched to outcome-based.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Receiving one's preferred incentive design may not play a strong role in behavioral goal adherence during financially incentivized weight loss interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241254366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Examine associations between whether participants' were matched to their preferred financial incentive design and behavioral goal adherence in a weight management intervention.

Design: Secondary quantitative analysis incorporating qualitative survey data.

Setting: Primary care clinics in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities in New York City and Los Angeles.

Subjects: 668 participants (mean age 47.7 years, 81.0% female, 72.6% Hispanic) with obesity were enrolled in the Financial Incentives foR Weight Reduction (FIReWoRk) intervention.

Measures: We explored qualitatively participant's reasons for hypothetically choosing a behavioral goal-directed vs a weight loss outcome-based financial incentive program. Additionally, behavioral adherence to different goals was collected at the 6-month timepoint, categorized by match to preferred financial incentive design.

Analysis: Logistic regression was used to examine if participants with certain demographic and higher psychosocial factors were more likely to choose goal-directed over outcome-based incentives. Additionally, logistic regression was used to test for associations between preference and behavioral adherence, using incentive type as an interaction term.

Results: 60.2% of participants preferred the goal-directed incentive, with the majority stating that it was more structured. Married participants were more likely to prefer goal-directed incentives (OR = 1.57, CI = 1.06-2.33, P = .025). Moderation analysis revealed that participants who preferred goal-directed and were matched to goal-directed had greater rates of behavioral adherence for program attendance and self-weighing, but not dietary tracking and physical activity tracking, compared to those who preferred outcome-based and were matched to outcome-based.

Conclusion: Receiving one's preferred incentive design may not play a strong role in behavioral goal adherence during financially incentivized weight loss interventions.

低收入参与者对行为目标与减肥目标的经济激励的偏好以及与行为目标坚持的关联。
目的:在体重管理干预中,研究参与者是否与自己喜欢的经济激励设计相匹配与行为目标坚持之间的关系:设计:结合定性调查数据进行二次定量分析:地点:纽约市和洛杉矶市社会经济条件较差社区的初级保健诊所:668名肥胖症参与者(平均年龄46.9岁,81.0%为女性,97.7%为西班牙裔)参加了减重经济激励(FIReWoRk)干预项目:我们从定性角度探讨了受试者假设选择以行为目标为导向的经济激励项目与以减重结果为导向的经济激励项目的原因。此外,我们还在6个月的时间点收集了不同目标的行为坚持情况,并根据与首选经济激励设计的匹配程度进行了分类:分析:采用逻辑回归法研究是否具有特定人口统计学因素和较高社会心理因素的参与者更倾向于选择目标导向型激励措施,而不是结果导向型激励措施。此外,我们还使用逻辑回归法检验了激励类型作为交互项与行为依从性之间的关联:结果:60.1%的参与者偏好目标导向型激励机制,其中大多数人认为这种激励机制更有条理。已婚参与者更倾向于目标导向型激励机制(OR = 1.57,CI = 1.06-2.33,P = .025)。调节分析显示,与偏好基于结果且与基于结果相匹配的参与者相比,偏好目标导向型且与目标导向型相匹配的参与者对项目出席率和自我称重的行为坚持率更高,但对饮食跟踪和体育锻炼跟踪的行为坚持率则不高:结论:在经济激励的减肥干预过程中,接受个人偏好的激励设计可能不会对行为目标的坚持起到很大作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信