The genetic structure of founding bumblebee populations in reconstructed prairie habitat 3 years after planting

IF 2.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Clarissa E. Bruns, James W. Demastes, Peter B. Berendzen, Ai Wen
{"title":"The genetic structure of founding bumblebee populations in reconstructed prairie habitat 3 years after planting","authors":"Clarissa E. Bruns, James W. Demastes, Peter B. Berendzen, Ai Wen","doi":"10.1111/rec.14176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The decline of wild bee pollinators has prompted habitat reconstruction in many regions around the world in order to increase the floral resources available to pollinators. Relatively little research has monitored the genetic differentiation and the relatedness of founding bumblebee populations during the colony recruitment process after vegetation is planted in the landscape. We surveyed nine 3‐year post‐planting reconstructed prairie sites located in the corn belt of the U.S. Midwest, where the landscape is largely dominated by industrialized row crops. Using seven microsatellite loci from 103 <jats:italic>Bombus griseocollis</jats:italic>, we examined the population genetics of this generalist bee's colonies established on these newly constructed prairie sites. When analyzed, <jats:italic>B. griseocollis</jats:italic> populations from an older reconstructed site were more genetically distinct from newly established bumblebee populations on reconstructed sites, while the new reconstructed sites exhibited no genetic structure. The floral richness or abundance at the reconstructed sites did not contribute to the allelic richness of the recolonized bumblebee populations. We did, however, find significant negative correlations between the bumblebee populations' allelic richness and the percent coverage of row‐crop farmland in the surrounding landscape and positive correlations between the allelic richness and forest and woody wetland habitat covers. This finding strongly indicates the importance of the composition of the surrounding landscape in the recruitment period of the founding pollinator populations.","PeriodicalId":54487,"journal":{"name":"Restoration Ecology","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restoration Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14176","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The decline of wild bee pollinators has prompted habitat reconstruction in many regions around the world in order to increase the floral resources available to pollinators. Relatively little research has monitored the genetic differentiation and the relatedness of founding bumblebee populations during the colony recruitment process after vegetation is planted in the landscape. We surveyed nine 3‐year post‐planting reconstructed prairie sites located in the corn belt of the U.S. Midwest, where the landscape is largely dominated by industrialized row crops. Using seven microsatellite loci from 103 Bombus griseocollis, we examined the population genetics of this generalist bee's colonies established on these newly constructed prairie sites. When analyzed, B. griseocollis populations from an older reconstructed site were more genetically distinct from newly established bumblebee populations on reconstructed sites, while the new reconstructed sites exhibited no genetic structure. The floral richness or abundance at the reconstructed sites did not contribute to the allelic richness of the recolonized bumblebee populations. We did, however, find significant negative correlations between the bumblebee populations' allelic richness and the percent coverage of row‐crop farmland in the surrounding landscape and positive correlations between the allelic richness and forest and woody wetland habitat covers. This finding strongly indicates the importance of the composition of the surrounding landscape in the recruitment period of the founding pollinator populations.
种植 3 年后重建草原栖息地中创始熊蜂种群的遗传结构
野生蜜蜂授粉者的减少促使全球许多地区重建栖息地,以增加授粉者可利用的花卉资源。相对较少的研究监测了景观植被种植后蜂群招募过程中创始熊蜂种群的遗传分化和亲缘关系。我们调查了位于美国中西部玉米带的 9 个种植 3 年后重建的草原地点,那里的地貌主要以工业化的连作作物为主。我们利用来自 103 Bombus griseocollis 的 7 个微卫星位点,研究了在这些新建草原上建立的这种通才蜂群的种群遗传学。经过分析,来自老的重建地点的大黄蜂种群与重建地点上新建立的大黄蜂种群在遗传学上有更大的差异,而新的重建地点则没有表现出遗传结构。重建地点的花卉丰富度或丰度并不影响重新定居的熊蜂种群的等位基因丰富度。然而,我们发现熊蜂种群的等位基因丰富度与周围景观中的农田覆盖率之间存在明显的负相关,而等位基因丰富度与森林和木本湿地栖息地覆盖率之间存在正相关。这一发现有力地表明,周围景观的构成在传粉昆虫种群的始祖鸟迁入期非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Restoration Ecology
Restoration Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
15.60%
发文量
226
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Restoration Ecology fosters the exchange of ideas among the many disciplines involved with ecological restoration. Addressing global concerns and communicating them to the international research community and restoration practitioners, the journal is at the forefront of a vital new direction in science, ecology, and policy. Original papers describe experimental, observational, and theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine, and freshwater systems, and are considered without taxonomic bias. Contributions span the natural sciences, including ecological and biological aspects, as well as the restoration of soil, air and water when set in an ecological context; and the social sciences, including cultural, philosophical, political, educational, economic and historical aspects. Edited by a distinguished panel, the journal continues to be a major conduit for researchers to publish their findings in the fight to not only halt ecological damage, but also to ultimately reverse it.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信