Safety of single-use flexible ureteroscopy for dusting of upper urinary tract calculi in children

IF 0.5 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ahmed Samir, Osama EL Gamal, Samir El Gamal, Salah Nagla
{"title":"Safety of single-use flexible ureteroscopy for dusting of upper urinary tract calculi in children","authors":"Ahmed Samir, Osama EL Gamal, Samir El Gamal, Salah Nagla","doi":"10.1186/s12301-024-00428-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flexible ureteroscopy offers numerous advantages, such as increased reach, superior stone-free rate, reduced risk of bleeding, minimal surgical trauma, and faster recovery time. There are few studies discussing the effectiveness of single-use flexible ureteroscopy in children, and none so far have addressed its safety. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a single-use flexible ureteroscope for treating upper urinary tract stones in children. This study included children with single upper urinary tract stones measuring less than 2 cm who underwent single-use flexible ureteroscopy between October 2020 and January 2023. We assessed the following patient characteristics: age, gender, stone type, size, position, pre and postoperative stent placements, use of a ureteral access sheath, stone-free rate, operation duration, and the rate of complications. A patient was considered stone-free if there were no residual stone particles larger than 3 mm after surgery. Flexible ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy were undertaken for 44 participants, with an average age of 8.5 years (range: 2–16 years). The typical stone size was 14 mm (range: 6–20 mm). The average operation time was 74 min (range 35–110 min). Ureteral access sheaths were used in 81.8% (36 out of 44) of procedures. After a single FURS session, 86.36% (38 out of 44) of patients achieved stone-free status. Postoperative JJ stent application was noted in 86.4% (38 out of 44) of patients. Complications were categorized using the Calvien system, revealing that 25% (11 out of 44) of patients experienced mild hematuria, colic, and low-grade fever (Calvien I). No severe side effects like mucosal avulsion or ureteral perforation were reported. In the short-term, single-use flexible ureteroscopy is a safe and effective method for managing single renal and proximal ureteric stones, measuring 2 cm or less, in children.","PeriodicalId":7432,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-024-00428-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flexible ureteroscopy offers numerous advantages, such as increased reach, superior stone-free rate, reduced risk of bleeding, minimal surgical trauma, and faster recovery time. There are few studies discussing the effectiveness of single-use flexible ureteroscopy in children, and none so far have addressed its safety. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a single-use flexible ureteroscope for treating upper urinary tract stones in children. This study included children with single upper urinary tract stones measuring less than 2 cm who underwent single-use flexible ureteroscopy between October 2020 and January 2023. We assessed the following patient characteristics: age, gender, stone type, size, position, pre and postoperative stent placements, use of a ureteral access sheath, stone-free rate, operation duration, and the rate of complications. A patient was considered stone-free if there were no residual stone particles larger than 3 mm after surgery. Flexible ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy were undertaken for 44 participants, with an average age of 8.5 years (range: 2–16 years). The typical stone size was 14 mm (range: 6–20 mm). The average operation time was 74 min (range 35–110 min). Ureteral access sheaths were used in 81.8% (36 out of 44) of procedures. After a single FURS session, 86.36% (38 out of 44) of patients achieved stone-free status. Postoperative JJ stent application was noted in 86.4% (38 out of 44) of patients. Complications were categorized using the Calvien system, revealing that 25% (11 out of 44) of patients experienced mild hematuria, colic, and low-grade fever (Calvien I). No severe side effects like mucosal avulsion or ureteral perforation were reported. In the short-term, single-use flexible ureteroscopy is a safe and effective method for managing single renal and proximal ureteric stones, measuring 2 cm or less, in children.
一次性使用柔性输尿管镜为儿童上尿路结石除尘的安全性
柔性输尿管镜具有许多优点,如可触及范围更广、无结石率更高、出血风险更低、手术创伤更小、恢复时间更快。有关一次性使用柔性输尿管镜在儿童中的有效性的研究很少,迄今为止也没有研究涉及其安全性。本研究旨在评估一次性使用柔性输尿管镜治疗儿童上尿路结石的有效性和安全性。本研究纳入了在2020年10月至2023年1月期间接受一次性使用柔性输尿管镜检查的单发上尿路结石小于2厘米的儿童。我们评估了以下患者特征:年龄、性别、结石类型、大小、位置、术前和术后支架放置情况、输尿管通道鞘的使用情况、无结石率、手术持续时间和并发症发生率。如果患者术后没有大于 3 毫米的残留结石颗粒,则视为无结石。44名参与者接受了输尿管软镜检查和钬激光碎石术,平均年龄为8.5岁(2-16岁)。结石的典型大小为 14 毫米(范围:6-20 毫米)。平均手术时间为 74 分钟(35-110 分钟不等)。81.8%的手术(44 例中有 36 例)使用了输尿管入路鞘。单次 FURS 治疗后,86.36% 的患者(44 例中有 38 例)达到了无结石状态。86.4%的患者(44 例中有 38 例)在术后使用了 JJ 支架。并发症采用卡尔文系统进行分类,结果显示,25% 的患者(44 人中有 11 人)出现轻度血尿、绞痛和低烧(卡尔文 I)。没有关于粘膜撕裂或输尿管穿孔等严重副作用的报道。在短期内,一次性使用柔性输尿管镜检查是一种安全有效的方法,可用于治疗儿童单发肾结石和输尿管近端结石(2 厘米或以下)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Urology
African Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信