Cross-Sectional Melt Pool Geometry of Laser Scanned Tracks and Pads on Nickel Alloy 718 for the 2022 Additive Manufacturing Benchmark Challenges

IF 2.4 3区 材料科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Jordan S. Weaver, David Deisenroth, Sergey Mekhontsev, Brandon M. Lane, Lyle E. Levine, Ho Yeung
{"title":"Cross-Sectional Melt Pool Geometry of Laser Scanned Tracks and Pads on Nickel Alloy 718 for the 2022 Additive Manufacturing Benchmark Challenges","authors":"Jordan S. Weaver, David Deisenroth, Sergey Mekhontsev, Brandon M. Lane, Lyle E. Levine, Ho Yeung","doi":"10.1007/s40192-024-00355-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Additive Manufacturing Benchmark Series (AM Bench) is a NIST-led organization that provides a continuing series of additive manufacturing benchmark measurements, challenge problems, and conferences with the primary goal of enabling modelers to test their simulations against rigorous, highly controlled additive manufacturing benchmark measurement data. To this end, single-track (1D) and pad (2D) scans on bare plate nickel alloy 718 were completed with thermography, cross-sectional grain orientation and local chemical composition maps, and cross-sectional melt pool size measurements. The laser power, scan speed, and laser spot size were varied for single tracks, and the scan direction was varied for pads. This article focuses on the cross-sectional melt pool size measurements and presents the predictions from challenge problems. Single-track depth correlated with volumetric energy density while width did not (within the studied parameters). The melt pool size for pad scans was greater than single tracks due to heat buildup. Pad scan melt pool depth was reduced when the laser scan direction and gas flow direction were parallel. The melt pool size in pad scans showed little to no trend against position within the pads. Uncertainty budgets for cross-sectional melt pool size from optical micrographs are provided for the purpose of model validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13604,"journal":{"name":"Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-024-00355-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Additive Manufacturing Benchmark Series (AM Bench) is a NIST-led organization that provides a continuing series of additive manufacturing benchmark measurements, challenge problems, and conferences with the primary goal of enabling modelers to test their simulations against rigorous, highly controlled additive manufacturing benchmark measurement data. To this end, single-track (1D) and pad (2D) scans on bare plate nickel alloy 718 were completed with thermography, cross-sectional grain orientation and local chemical composition maps, and cross-sectional melt pool size measurements. The laser power, scan speed, and laser spot size were varied for single tracks, and the scan direction was varied for pads. This article focuses on the cross-sectional melt pool size measurements and presents the predictions from challenge problems. Single-track depth correlated with volumetric energy density while width did not (within the studied parameters). The melt pool size for pad scans was greater than single tracks due to heat buildup. Pad scan melt pool depth was reduced when the laser scan direction and gas flow direction were parallel. The melt pool size in pad scans showed little to no trend against position within the pads. Uncertainty budgets for cross-sectional melt pool size from optical micrographs are provided for the purpose of model validation.

Abstract Image

针对 2022 年增材制造基准挑战的镍合金 718 激光扫描轨迹和焊盘的横截面熔池几何形状
增材制造基准系列(AM Bench)是由 NIST 领导的一个组织,该组织提供一系列持续的增材制造基准测量、挑战问题和会议,其主要目标是使建模人员能够根据严格、高度受控的增材制造基准测量数据来测试他们的模拟。为此,通过热成像、横截面晶粒取向和局部化学成分图以及横截面熔池尺寸测量,完成了对裸板镍合金 718 的单轨(1D)和焊盘(2D)扫描。对于单轨扫描,激光功率、扫描速度和激光光斑大小均有变化;对于焊盘扫描,扫描方向也有变化。本文侧重于横截面熔池尺寸测量,并介绍了挑战问题的预测结果。单轨深度与体积能量密度相关,而宽度与之无关(在研究参数范围内)。由于热量积聚,焊盘扫描的熔池尺寸大于单轨。当激光扫描方向与气体流动方向平行时,焊盘扫描熔池深度减小。焊盘扫描的熔池大小几乎没有与焊盘内位置相关的趋势。为了验证模型,我们提供了光学显微照片截面熔池尺寸的不确定性预算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation
Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
42
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The journal will publish: Research that supports building a model-based definition of materials and processes that is compatible with model-based engineering design processes and multidisciplinary design optimization; Descriptions of novel experimental or computational tools or data analysis techniques, and their application, that are to be used for ICME; Best practices in verification and validation of computational tools, sensitivity analysis, uncertainty quantification, and data management, as well as standards and protocols for software integration and exchange of data; In-depth descriptions of data, databases, and database tools; Detailed case studies on efforts, and their impact, that integrate experiment and computation to solve an enduring engineering problem in materials and manufacturing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信