Claire Zuch, Jordan Belisle, Dana Paliliunas, Ashley Payne, Elana Sickman, Breanna Lee, Lindsey Dennis
{"title":"A Model Dependent Scoping Review of Research on Sexism and Racism in Major Behavior Analytic Journals","authors":"Claire Zuch, Jordan Belisle, Dana Paliliunas, Ashley Payne, Elana Sickman, Breanna Lee, Lindsey Dennis","doi":"10.1007/s42822-024-00167-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Behavior analysts are becoming increasingly aware of and involved in the study of issues related to sex, gender, and racial prejudice and discrimination. In the current article, we conceptualized sexism and gender bias informed by the framework of the nested sociobehavioral model of racism developed by Belisle et al. <i>Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15</i>(4), 1134–1150 (2022), including implicit bias, selective gender norms, and systemic oppression, while integrating feminist and queer theories. We then conducted a model-dependent scoping review of research in major behavior analytic journals from 2000 to 2022 related to racism and sexism categorized using the nested models and the theory-to-impact framework developed by Dixon et al. <i>Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41</i>(1), 241–267 (2018). Of the 10 journals included for the scoping review, nine contained research related to racism or sexism and an overall increasing trend appears to be occurring in the field. Inconsistencies were evident between conceptual work that emphasized systemic oppression versus experimental work that emphasizes implicit bias and relational framing. Only three studies met the criteria for “applied” or “implementation” research, suggesting that significantly more research is needed to inform the development and dissemination of applied technologies. We conclude with a discussion of the current state of this research in multiple areas and recommendations for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":44553,"journal":{"name":"Behavior and Social Issues","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior and Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-024-00167-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Behavior analysts are becoming increasingly aware of and involved in the study of issues related to sex, gender, and racial prejudice and discrimination. In the current article, we conceptualized sexism and gender bias informed by the framework of the nested sociobehavioral model of racism developed by Belisle et al. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15(4), 1134–1150 (2022), including implicit bias, selective gender norms, and systemic oppression, while integrating feminist and queer theories. We then conducted a model-dependent scoping review of research in major behavior analytic journals from 2000 to 2022 related to racism and sexism categorized using the nested models and the theory-to-impact framework developed by Dixon et al. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41(1), 241–267 (2018). Of the 10 journals included for the scoping review, nine contained research related to racism or sexism and an overall increasing trend appears to be occurring in the field. Inconsistencies were evident between conceptual work that emphasized systemic oppression versus experimental work that emphasizes implicit bias and relational framing. Only three studies met the criteria for “applied” or “implementation” research, suggesting that significantly more research is needed to inform the development and dissemination of applied technologies. We conclude with a discussion of the current state of this research in multiple areas and recommendations for future research.
期刊介绍:
The primary intellectual framework for Behavior and Social Issues is the science of behavior analysis and its sub-discipline of cultural systems analysis, but contributions from contrasting viewpoints will occasionally be considered if of specific interest to behavior analysts. We recommend that potential authors examine recent issues to determine whether their work is appropriate to the journal. Appropriate contributions include theoretical and conceptual analyses, research articles and brief reports, dialogues, and research reviews. Behavior and Social Issues is an appropriate forum for the work of senior scholars in the field, many of whom serve on the editorial board, as well as for the work of emerging scholars, including students, who have an interest in the contributions of a natural science of behavior to constructing cultures of social justice, human rights, and environmental sustainability.