Freedom of Speech and Academic Freedom in Higher Education in England

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Dominic McGoldrick
{"title":"Freedom of Speech and Academic Freedom in Higher Education in England","authors":"Dominic McGoldrick","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2024.a926223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article considers the context, development, and significance of the <i>Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023</i>. The Act was relatively unusual in aiming to increase the normative strength of freedom of speech. The central justification given for the Act was the need to respond to an increasing number of interferences with free speech and academic freedom occurring at universities. The growth of a \"cancel culture\" was having a \"chilling effect\" on students, staff, and visiting speakers. The article examines a range of high-profile cases and incidents that have attracted political and media attention. Many of these have concerned contemporary debates related to trans issues and identity politics. The issues discussed in the article are of wider international interest. Similar controversies have been experienced in universities in other states. The article makes comparative reference to developments in the field in the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The article examines the perceived issues and evidential bases for the Act, reviews the legal duties, and analyzes the key legal concepts. It considers these in terms of compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights (1950). It concludes by addressing three thematic issues: (i) a Model Code; (ii) challenging university ideologies; and (iii) securing cultural change.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Rights Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2024.a926223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article considers the context, development, and significance of the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023. The Act was relatively unusual in aiming to increase the normative strength of freedom of speech. The central justification given for the Act was the need to respond to an increasing number of interferences with free speech and academic freedom occurring at universities. The growth of a "cancel culture" was having a "chilling effect" on students, staff, and visiting speakers. The article examines a range of high-profile cases and incidents that have attracted political and media attention. Many of these have concerned contemporary debates related to trans issues and identity politics. The issues discussed in the article are of wider international interest. Similar controversies have been experienced in universities in other states. The article makes comparative reference to developments in the field in the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The article examines the perceived issues and evidential bases for the Act, reviews the legal duties, and analyzes the key legal concepts. It considers these in terms of compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights (1950). It concludes by addressing three thematic issues: (i) a Model Code; (ii) challenging university ideologies; and (iii) securing cultural change.

英国高等教育中的言论自由和学术自由
本文探讨了《2023 年高等教育(言论自由)法》的背景、发展和意义。该法案旨在增强言论自由的规范力量,这一点相对不同寻常。该法的核心理由是,有必要应对大学中发生的越来越多的干涉言论自由和学术自由的行为。取消文化 "的发展对学生、教职员工和来访演讲者产生了 "寒蝉效应"。文章探讨了一系列引起政治和媒体关注的高调案例和事件。其中许多都涉及到与变性问题和身份政治有关的当代辩论。文章中讨论的问题具有广泛的国际意义。其他国家的大学也经历过类似的争议。文章比较了美国、加拿大、澳大利亚和新西兰在该领域的发展。文章研究了该法案的认知问题和证据基础,回顾了法律义务,并分析了关键的法律概念。文章从与《欧洲人权公约》(1950 年)的兼容性角度考虑了这些问题。文章最后讨论了三个主题问题:(i) 《示范法》;(ii) 挑战大学意识形态;(iii) 确保文化变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Now entering its twenty-fifth year, Human Rights Quarterly is widely recognizedas the leader in the field of human rights. Articles written by experts from around the world and from a range of disciplines are edited to be understood by the intelligent reader. The Quarterly provides up-to-date information on important developments within the United Nations and regional human rights organizations, both governmental and non-governmental. It presents current work in human rights research and policy analysis, reviews of related books, and philosophical essays probing the fundamental nature of human rights as defined by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信