Imitations of Infinity: Gregory of Nyssa and the Transformation of Mimesis by Michael Motia (review)

IF 0.5 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Bradley K. Storin
{"title":"Imitations of Infinity: Gregory of Nyssa and the Transformation of Mimesis by Michael Motia (review)","authors":"Bradley K. Storin","doi":"10.1353/jla.2024.a926290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Imitations of Infinity: Gregory of Nyssa and the Transformation of Mimesis</em> by Michael Motia <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Bradley K. Storin </li> </ul> <em>Imitations of Infinity: Gregory of Nyssa and the Transformation of Mimesis</em> M<small>ichael</small> M<small>otia</small> Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2021. Pp. 288. ISBN: 9780812253139 <p>In this fine new monograph on late antique intellectual history, Michael Motia broaches a question that scholars of late antique religion don't ask as much as they perhaps should: what precisely do late antique Christians think Christianity in Late Antiquity is? Put differently, why should anyone identify as a Christian and participate in Christian community and ritual life? For his part, Gregory of Nyssa (around 335–395 <small>ce</small>) provides a direct and succinct answer: \"Christianity is <em>mimesis</em> of the divine nature\" (<em>On What It Means to Call Oneself a Christian</em> 85 [<em>GNO</em> 29: 136], quoted on page 1]). And what does <em>that</em> mean? How can a human being (corporeal and finite) imitate the divine nature (incorporeal and infinite)? What exactly are Christians imitating, and with which practices and guidelines? Motia's learned study guides readers through the many nooks and crannies of Nyssen's thought and writings to reveal that, at least for this late ancient theologian, imitating infinity means infinitely extending the Christian's desire toward God. Mimesis was a program for Christian life.</p> <p>Hardly configured in an intellectual vacuum, Nyssen's formulation represents his contribution to longstanding philosophical debates about the value of mimesis that began with Plato and continued throughout late antiquity. Motia's first chapter identifies two unresolved \"mimetic tracks\" (41) in Plato's writings—aesthetic representation and ontological participation. The former (articulated in the <em>Republic</em> and <em>Symposium</em>) involves a mode of desiring, or an \"erotic,\" built on a love for beauty and truth, that manifests in literary, artistic, and argumentative representation. The latter (articulated in the <em>Timaeus</em>) involves an erotic, constructed on attraction to the intelligible order, that manifests in a creature's transformation into an image of the transcendent in order to participate in the divine nature. In the second chapter, we learn how the heirs of the Platonic tradition—Plotinus, Porphyry, Iamblichus, and to a lesser extent Julian—attempted to resolve these two tracks in light of their own concerns. Whereas Plotinus welded them with a focus on intellectual activity and assimilation with the One (thus emphasizing the soul's ascent out of creation), Iamblichus did so with a focus on liturgy as the site of mimesis. For Plotinus, mimesis consists of thought and becoming like the object of contemplation; for Iamblichus, it consists of the ritual utilization of words and images and ecstatic transformation through prayer. Of course, philosophy did not have proprietary ownership of mimesis, and Christian writers had long championed mimesis as the proper human response to the divine, beginning with Paul in the first century. Motia's third chapter follows this thread, exploring Philippians and 1 Corinthians but also writings connected to martyrdom, asceticism, artistic representation, and theology. Mimesis, it turns out, is everywhere in early Christian literature, and its ubiquity makes the one chapter that Motia gives to it feel a bit like stuffing three months' worth of clothing into a carry-on suitcase.</p> <p>This is all context, though, for a multifaceted discussion of mimesis in <strong>[End Page 279]</strong> Nyssen's view of Christian identity and practice. In Motia's fourth chapter, we learn that Nyssen's treatise <em>On Perfection</em> holds that a Christian is a Christian because she ontologically participates in the names that scriptural texts, particularly the letters of Paul, apply to Christ: \"rock\" (1 Cor 10.4), \"inaccessible\" (1 Tim 6.16), \"image of the invisible God\" (Col 1.15), and so on. Building on contemporary debates about the potency of language, Nyssen asserts that the names of Christ are containers for the uncontainable and, when the Christian makes space in her own soul for those names, she binds herself to the divine and consequently becomes an image for other Christians to imitate. Motia's fifth chapter, a difficult one for this reviewer to follow, treats physical space as a site of mimesis. Motia seems to be discussing holiness and holy space, but he frames the issue confusingly with queries...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":16220,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Late Antiquity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Late Antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jla.2024.a926290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Imitations of Infinity: Gregory of Nyssa and the Transformation of Mimesis by Michael Motia
  • Bradley K. Storin
Imitations of Infinity: Gregory of Nyssa and the Transformation of Mimesis Michael Motia Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2021. Pp. 288. ISBN: 9780812253139

In this fine new monograph on late antique intellectual history, Michael Motia broaches a question that scholars of late antique religion don't ask as much as they perhaps should: what precisely do late antique Christians think Christianity in Late Antiquity is? Put differently, why should anyone identify as a Christian and participate in Christian community and ritual life? For his part, Gregory of Nyssa (around 335–395 ce) provides a direct and succinct answer: "Christianity is mimesis of the divine nature" (On What It Means to Call Oneself a Christian 85 [GNO 29: 136], quoted on page 1]). And what does that mean? How can a human being (corporeal and finite) imitate the divine nature (incorporeal and infinite)? What exactly are Christians imitating, and with which practices and guidelines? Motia's learned study guides readers through the many nooks and crannies of Nyssen's thought and writings to reveal that, at least for this late ancient theologian, imitating infinity means infinitely extending the Christian's desire toward God. Mimesis was a program for Christian life.

Hardly configured in an intellectual vacuum, Nyssen's formulation represents his contribution to longstanding philosophical debates about the value of mimesis that began with Plato and continued throughout late antiquity. Motia's first chapter identifies two unresolved "mimetic tracks" (41) in Plato's writings—aesthetic representation and ontological participation. The former (articulated in the Republic and Symposium) involves a mode of desiring, or an "erotic," built on a love for beauty and truth, that manifests in literary, artistic, and argumentative representation. The latter (articulated in the Timaeus) involves an erotic, constructed on attraction to the intelligible order, that manifests in a creature's transformation into an image of the transcendent in order to participate in the divine nature. In the second chapter, we learn how the heirs of the Platonic tradition—Plotinus, Porphyry, Iamblichus, and to a lesser extent Julian—attempted to resolve these two tracks in light of their own concerns. Whereas Plotinus welded them with a focus on intellectual activity and assimilation with the One (thus emphasizing the soul's ascent out of creation), Iamblichus did so with a focus on liturgy as the site of mimesis. For Plotinus, mimesis consists of thought and becoming like the object of contemplation; for Iamblichus, it consists of the ritual utilization of words and images and ecstatic transformation through prayer. Of course, philosophy did not have proprietary ownership of mimesis, and Christian writers had long championed mimesis as the proper human response to the divine, beginning with Paul in the first century. Motia's third chapter follows this thread, exploring Philippians and 1 Corinthians but also writings connected to martyrdom, asceticism, artistic representation, and theology. Mimesis, it turns out, is everywhere in early Christian literature, and its ubiquity makes the one chapter that Motia gives to it feel a bit like stuffing three months' worth of clothing into a carry-on suitcase.

This is all context, though, for a multifaceted discussion of mimesis in [End Page 279] Nyssen's view of Christian identity and practice. In Motia's fourth chapter, we learn that Nyssen's treatise On Perfection holds that a Christian is a Christian because she ontologically participates in the names that scriptural texts, particularly the letters of Paul, apply to Christ: "rock" (1 Cor 10.4), "inaccessible" (1 Tim 6.16), "image of the invisible God" (Col 1.15), and so on. Building on contemporary debates about the potency of language, Nyssen asserts that the names of Christ are containers for the uncontainable and, when the Christian makes space in her own soul for those names, she binds herself to the divine and consequently becomes an image for other Christians to imitate. Motia's fifth chapter, a difficult one for this reviewer to follow, treats physical space as a site of mimesis. Motia seems to be discussing holiness and holy space, but he frames the issue confusingly with queries...

无限的模仿:迈克尔-莫蒂亚著的《尼萨的格里高利与模仿的变革》(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 无限的模仿:Michael Motia Bradley K. Storin Imitations of Infinity:Michael Motia Philadelphia:宾夕法尼亚大学出版社,2021 年。第 288 页。ISBN: 9780812253139 在这本关于晚期古代思想史的优秀新专著中,迈克尔-莫蒂亚提出了一个晚期古代宗教学者们或许不应该多问的问题:晚期古代基督徒究竟认为晚期古代的基督教是什么?换句话说,为什么有人要认定自己是基督徒并参与基督教团体和仪式生活?格雷戈里-尼萨(Gregory of Nyssa,约公元前 335-395 年)给出了直接而简洁的答案:"基督教是对神性的模仿"(《论自称为基督徒的意义》85 [GNO 29: 136],引自第 1 页])。这意味着什么?人(有形的、有限的)如何模仿神性(无形的、无限的)?基督徒模仿的究竟是什么?莫蒂亚的研究博学多才,他引导读者穿过尼森思想和著作中的许多犄角旮旯,揭示出至少对这位晚期古代神学家来说,模仿无限意味着无限延伸基督徒对上帝的渴望。模仿是基督徒生活的纲领。尼森的表述并不是在知识真空中形成的,他的表述代表了他对关于模仿的价值的长期哲学争论的贡献,这种争论始于柏拉图,并延续到整个古代晚期。莫蒂亚的第一章指出了柏拉图著作中两条悬而未决的 "模仿轨道"(41)--审美再现和本体论参与。前者(在《共和国》和《论辩篇》中得到阐述)涉及一种欲望模式,或一种建立在对美和真理的爱之上的 "情欲",表现为文学、艺术和论辩的表征。后者(在《蒂迈欧篇》中阐述)涉及一种情欲,它建立在对可理解秩序的吸引之上,表现为生物为了参与神性而转化为超验者的形象。在第二章中,我们将了解柏拉图传统的继承者--普罗提诺、波菲利、伊安布利修斯,以及在较小程度上的朱利安--是如何根据自己的关注点来解决这两个问题的。普罗提诺以智力活动和与 "一 "的同化(从而强调灵魂从造物中升华)为重点将两者结合起来,而伊安布利丘斯则以礼仪作为模仿的场所。对普罗提诺来说,模仿包括思考和变得像沉思的对象;而对伊安布利库斯来说,模仿包括在仪式中使用文字和图像,以及通过祈祷进行狂喜的转化。当然,哲学对 "模仿 "并没有专有的所有权,基督教作家长期以来一直将 "模仿 "作为人类对神灵的正确回应,从一世纪的保罗开始就一直如此。莫蒂亚的第三章沿着这条线索,探讨了《腓立比书》和《哥林多前书》,以及与殉难、禁欲主义、艺术表现和神学有关的著作。事实证明,拟态在早期基督教文学中无处不在,它的无处不在让莫蒂亚用一章的篇幅来讨论它,感觉有点像把三个月的衣服塞进随身携带的行李箱。不过,这都是为了从多方面讨论尼森眼中的模仿[第279页完]基督徒身份与实践。在莫蒂亚的第四章中,我们了解到,尼森的论文《论完美》认为,基督徒之所以是基督徒,是因为她在本体上参与了圣经文本,尤其是保罗书信中对基督的称呼:"磐石"(林前 10.4)、"不可接近的"(提摩太前书 6.16)、"看不见之神的像"(西 1.15)等等。尼森以当代关于语言效力的辩论为基础,断言基督的名字是不可容纳之物的容器,当基督徒在自己的灵魂中为这些名字留出空间时,她就将自己与神联系在一起,从而成为其他基督徒模仿的形象。莫蒂亚的第五章是本评论者难以理解的一章,它将物理空间视为模仿的场所。莫蒂亚似乎在讨论圣洁和圣洁空间,但他的问题框架令人困惑,质疑......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Late Antiquity
Journal of Late Antiquity HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信