{"title":"Backtesting Expected Shortfall: Accounting for both duration and severity with bivariate orthogonal polynomials","authors":"Sullivan Hué, Christophe Hurlin, Yang Lu","doi":"arxiv-2405.02012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose an original two-part, duration-severity approach for backtesting\nExpected Shortfall (ES). While Probability Integral Transform (PIT) based ES\nbacktests have gained popularity, they have yet to allow for separate testing\nof the frequency and severity of Value-at-Risk (VaR) violations. This is a\ncrucial aspect, as ES measures the average loss in the event of such\nviolations. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a backtesting framework\nthat relies on the sequence of inter-violation durations and the sequence of\nseverities in case of violations. By leveraging the theory of (bivariate)\northogonal polynomials, we derive orthogonal moment conditions satisfied by\nthese two sequences. Our approach includes a straightforward, model-free Wald\ntest, which encompasses various unconditional and conditional coverage\nbacktests for both VaR and ES. This test aids in identifying any mis-specified\ncomponents of the internal model used by banks to forecast ES. Moreover, it can\nbe extended to analyze other systemic risk measures such as Marginal Expected\nShortfall. Simulation experiments indicate that our test exhibits good finite\nsample properties for realistic sample sizes. Through application to two stock\nindices, we demonstrate how our methodology provides insights into the reasons\nfor rejections in testing ES validity.","PeriodicalId":501128,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Risk Management","volume":"212 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.02012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We propose an original two-part, duration-severity approach for backtesting
Expected Shortfall (ES). While Probability Integral Transform (PIT) based ES
backtests have gained popularity, they have yet to allow for separate testing
of the frequency and severity of Value-at-Risk (VaR) violations. This is a
crucial aspect, as ES measures the average loss in the event of such
violations. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a backtesting framework
that relies on the sequence of inter-violation durations and the sequence of
severities in case of violations. By leveraging the theory of (bivariate)
orthogonal polynomials, we derive orthogonal moment conditions satisfied by
these two sequences. Our approach includes a straightforward, model-free Wald
test, which encompasses various unconditional and conditional coverage
backtests for both VaR and ES. This test aids in identifying any mis-specified
components of the internal model used by banks to forecast ES. Moreover, it can
be extended to analyze other systemic risk measures such as Marginal Expected
Shortfall. Simulation experiments indicate that our test exhibits good finite
sample properties for realistic sample sizes. Through application to two stock
indices, we demonstrate how our methodology provides insights into the reasons
for rejections in testing ES validity.
我们提出了一种独创的由两部分组成的持续时间-平均值方法,用于回测预期短缺(ES)。虽然基于概率积分变换(PIT)的 ES 回测已广为流行,但它们尚未允许对违反风险价值(VaR)的频率和严重程度进行单独测试。这一点至关重要,因为 ES 衡量的是发生此类违规时的平均损失。为了克服这一局限性,我们引入了一个回溯测试框架,该框架依赖于违规间隔时间序列和违规情况下的严重程度序列。通过利用(双变量)正交多项式理论,我们得出了这两个序列所满足的正交矩条件。我们的方法包括直接的、无模型的沃尔德检验,其中包括对 VaR 和 ES 的各种无条件和条件覆盖率检验。该检验有助于识别银行用于预测 ES 的内部模型中的任何错误规范部分。此外,它还可以扩展到分析其他系统性风险指标,如边际预期损失。模拟实验表明,我们的检验在实际样本量下表现出良好的有限样本特性。通过对两个股票指数的应用,我们展示了我们的方法如何为测试 ES 有效性时出现拒绝的原因提供见解。